Over 1,600 People Removed From Voter Rolls Under Youngkin Order; Groups Seek Court Injunction

[1srelluc]

The last state that did this and were sued, around 3500 of the so called illegals removed from voter rolls were Naturalized, and citizens.....and they had to be reinstated on the voter rolls.

This is why the 90 days cut off is the law of the land.... So there is enough time for citizens wrongly removed, to be notified and can get themselves back on the voter rolls before the election.

I wouldn't worry about it...they have the 1600 people's names, and will be able to check and know if any of them voted illegally on Nov 5th etc, which is unlikely, but if someone did so illegally, they could charge them with the felony and/deport them.

Virginia has a law that tells the feds to pound sand and was signed into law by a dem Governor. Of course that was before the dems went bat-shit crazy.

This is a state's rights issue pure and simple.

Virginia first, all else after.

 

[Care4all]

Virginia has a law that tells the feds to pound sand and was signed into law by a dem Governor. Of course that was before the dems went bat-shit crazy.

This is a state's rights issue pure and simple.

Virginia first, all else after.

On a federal election, with a US codified election law that all states must follow, the US Federal govt through Congressional made law, Supersede any state law.

 

[SweetTea]

Why are Democrats always on the wrong side of securing elections? Things that make you go “hmmm”.

 

[1srelluc]

On a federal election, with a US codified election law that all states must follow, the US Federal govt through Congressional made law, Supersede any state law.

Let them try to enforce it.

 

[Care4all]

Why are Democrats always on the wrong side of securing elections? Things that make you go “hmmm”.

We're not!

We are simply on the side of the American citizen, and their right to vote in our elections for their government representation that our republic functions by.

We have zero issues removing illegal people off the voter rolls....but in order to protect our American citizens, that removal by the State has to be done with enough time for the people being removed being notified, and the wrongly removed citizens enough time to present their case and be reinstated on to the voter roll prior to their State being opened for early voting and absentee requests etc. THAT cut off, allowing time to fix the state govt mistakes, was determined to be 90 days prior to an election....shorter than that, risks disenfranchising citizens.

WHY IS THAT SO HARD FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND?

 

[JohnDB]

 

[Lisa558]

We're not!

We are simply on the side of the American citizen, and their right to vote in our elections for their government representation that our republic functions by.

We have zero issues removing illegal people off the voter rolls....but in order to protect our American citizens, that removal by the State has to be done with enough time for the people being removed being notified, and the wrongly removed citizens enough time to present their case and be reinstated on to the voter roll prior to their State being opened for early voting and absentee requests etc. THAT cut off, allowing time to fix the state govt mistakes, was determined to be 90 days prior to an election....shorter than that, risks disenfranchising citizens.

WHY IS THAT SO HARD FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND?

Allowing the illegals to vote negates the votes of the same number of citizens to vote. Why should someone who admitted he was a non-citizen on a jury form get to negate MY vote?

 

[1srelluc]

Allowing the illegals to vote negates the votes of the same number of citizens to vote. Why should someone who admitted he was a non-citizen on a jury form get to negate MY vote?

And yours is the very area where that can happen as most non-citizens are concentrated in NOtVA.

 

[Blaster]

The Democrats dirty tricks campaign is in high gear.

 

[Care4all]

U

my husband has dropped off my ballot the past two decades. There is nothing wrong with that....

The whole purpose for absentee ballots available for all registered voters is to make voting more convenient to their own work and personal lifestyle needs.

A relative should be able to drop off their family's ballot.

To tighten the system, the person who drops off the family's ballots could be required to also sign the outer envelope perhaps?

 

[konradv]

Allowing the illegals to vote negates the votes of the same number of citizens to vote. Why should someone who admitted he was a non-citizen on a jury form get to negate MY vote?

Illegals aren’t voting.

#MAGALIES

 

[Blaster]

Illegals aren’t voting.

Is that your final answer?

 

[SweetTea]

We're not!

We are simply on the side of the American citizen, and their right to vote in our elections for their government representation that our republic functions by.

We have zero issues removing illegal people off the voter rolls....but in order to protect our American citizens, that removal by the State has to be done with enough time for the people being removed being notified, and the wrongly removed citizens enough time to present their case and be reinstated on to the voter roll prior to their State being opened for early voting and absentee requests etc. THAT cut off, allowing time to fix the state govt mistakes, was determined to be 90 days prior to an election....shorter than that, risks disenfranchising citizens.

WHY IS THAT SO HARD FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND?

I can’t think of ONE time when Democrats were in favor of any move to secure elections. Every single time, they fall back to the voter disenfranchise argument. The best example is a voter id law. It is absurd for anyone to believe that requiring an ID to vote disenfranchises any significant number of voters. If 5 people were somehow disenfranchised but 1000 were kept from illegally voting, that would be a win. Voter rights are no more or no less important than having a secure election. The only reason Democrats care about voter id, for example, is that they believe that their voters would be the most affected, ironically, despite being the “smartest” and most educated.

Don’t kid yourself on this move to remove illegal voters from the rolls. Democrats wouldn’t have been in favor 1 year ago. They don’t want it. They want the possibility of illegals voting, even if not in huge numbers. I have no idea how any intelligent, informed person can’t see this.

 

[JohnDB]

U

my husband has dropped off my ballot the past two decades. There is nothing wrong with that....

The whole purpose for absentee ballots available for all registered voters is to make voting more convenient to their own work and personal lifestyle needs.

A relative should be able to drop off their family's ballot.

To tighten the system, the person who drops off the family's ballots could be required to also sign the outer envelope perhaps?

That's one thing....
But the stack in her hands is a whole other thing.
Her hands were FULL of ballots.

 

[SweetTea]

Illegals aren’t voting.

#MAGALIES

You forgot to add the “in mass” qualifier. Not keeping up with the latest rhetoric?

 

[JoeMoma]

Yes

They can claim you are not a citizen, resident or are dead.
You need sufficient time to prove otherwise.

The law says 90 days

Does the law say 90 days.... or did a judge simply decide it should be 90 days? I am asking because (1) I don't know and (2) I'm to lazy to find out on my own.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

A free and fair election does not include illegally removing CITIZENS legal right to vote for their representation.

Removing illegal voters should never be at the expense of wrongly taking a citizen's right to vote away. It can be done without doing that...

That shouldn't be so hard to understand?

How are citizens not able to vote?

 

[Care4all]

Allowing the illegals to vote negates the votes of the same number of citizens to vote. Why should someone who admitted he was a non-citizen on a jury form get to negate MY vote?

The handful of illegals that may vote, does NOT negate their right or move above, the Citizen's right to vote!

In ONE state, 3500 CITIZENS were wrongly removed, for goodness sake...for what? For maybe 10 of the illegals actually illegally voting, if any at all in that specific election?

Screw your head back on...that mass disenfranchisement of the citizen's vote, is NOT JUSTIFIED in any manner!

 

[Care4all]

Does the law say 90 days.... or did a judge simply decide it should be 90 days? I am asking because (1) I don't know and (2) I'm to lazy to find out on my own.

The law. That is why they are being sued and the Court accepted the suits with merit.

 

[JoeMoma]

The law. That is why they are being sued and the Court accepted the suits with merit.

If 90 days is spelled out in the law, then the judge is right. For now, I will take your word for it since I'm to lazy to look up the law and read it myself.