Ousted From Power By Voters, Dems Turn To Activist Judges To Defy Trump

[Contumacious]

You continue to spam nonsense.

CONTINUE READING JUDGE TOTENBERG'S FINDING UNTIL I TELL YOU STOP sometime tomorrow

- YOU MUST MEMORIZE HER RULING inside out

Am I making myself clear ?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Presidents are subject to judicial review.

 

[Contumacious]

Presidents are subject to judicial review.

Amy Totenberg is a federal judge .

Now from a Constitutional point of view Judicial Review within the meaning of Article III means SCOTUS.

 

[Modern Messiah]

Why? Trump is Putin’s agent now - Trump is a liar being an agent for a liar who fires missiles at civilians.

Trump already gave Putin everything he wants while Putin continues firing missiles at civilians.

Putin has to be happy with the yellow bellied coward Republicans in the Senate who could stop Trump from commiting the US to the Axis of Evil Russia, North Korean, China

Your low information diatribe speaks volumes about why leftists are so out of touch with reality.
It's all emotion and zero logic.
You know nothing about foreign policy.
You know nothing about diplomatic negotiations.
Yet here you are bloviating your pro war TDS claptrap.
You leftists wanted open borders, Why?
Just to spite President Trump and his supporters.
You destroyed the border, got people killed and now 350,000 children have been trafficked and nobody knows where they are.
Was that good for the country, NO.
All to spite President Trump.
You leftists are doing the same thing here.
Your going to start world war three just out of pure spite.
Your TDS has risen to dangerous levels not only for the USA but the entire world.
Get a grip!

 

[Modern Messiah]

You get that with security guarantees by the US and Europe.

And you THEN get rare earth and metals.

Again, with your word salad
There is a treaty on the table regarding Ukraine's rare earth, raw minerals/materials. It is the first step in the process to end the war.
zelensky could start the process of bringing this bloody war to an end and at the same time enter into a business contract that would allow The United States to recoup all the billions of dollars of tax payer money that was squandered in this Ukraine debacle that three stupid people basically started (cornpop, zelensky, and Putin).
It would also generate revenue to allow Ukraine to rebuild.
This one is a no brainer but your TDS is getting in the way again.

 

[Modern Messiah]

So he lied to you. Or he meant he will get Ukraine to surrender which will be death or prison to every Ukrainian soldier who can’t get out before Putin rolls into Kiev just as Hitler rolled into Paris.

View attachment 1085609
Ukrainians will fight until they can’t fight no more. So the Republican Party is bringing death because the slime Party is giving Putin the support he needs to achieve his original goal.

I hope the free world can go onto a war footing and help. Ukraine pushed back the invader. It’s too bad that the United States of America is no longer a part of the free world. The Republican Party is a deplorable mess of shit stained ignoramus white Christian nationalists you have no idea what they are doing in the name of Jesus their savior and the biblical worldview.

Nobody wants this Ukraine war to continue any longer.
Try to understand that.
There are hundreds of thousands of people that are now dead.
This war should never have even happened.
zelensky, putin, and tater head got us into this bloody debacle and now because you leftists have TDS you want to spite President Trump for no real reason. JUST SPITE.
Hopefully zelensky is smart enough to sign the deal, because if you leftists get your way hundreds of thousands of people will continue to die.
Get some perspective dude

 

[Modern Messiah]

Hard to find a more transparently pathetic, spineless, and shameless example of the complete abdication of moral American foreign policy leadership than that offered by Trump and Vance to Zelensky (a heroic leader in every meaningful sense).

You want war.
Hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, and you scream MORE, MORE, MORE!!!
Leftists are a special blend of sad and pathetic.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

ofpbv

JUDGE TOTENBERG'S

whut I say Judge Totenberg’s ruling in 2023 {that Contumacious cites} was not an “outcome determinative“ ruling that was in Donald Trump‘s favor in any way. proving that he had won the 2020 election. Her ruling does not provide cause for the Republican Party’s election fraud, crimes committed in 2021 to be excused or thrown out.

if Contumacious is gong to cite legal cases then he must cite all relevant cases in his argument.

250304 ofpbv

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs DONALD J. TRUMP, and every LAWLESS REPUBLICAN PARTY VOTER WHO CONTINUES TO SUPPORT HIS LAWLESSNESS

VIOLATIONS: Count 1: 18 U.S.C. § 371. (Conspiracy to Defraud the United. States). Count 2: 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k). (Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding). Count 3: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(c)(2), 2 (Obstruction of and Attempt to Obstruct an Official Proceeding) Count 4: 18 U.S.C. § 241. (Conspiracy Against Rights)

Manner and Means

10. The Defendant's conspiracy to impair, obstruct, and defeat the federal government function through dishonesty, fraud, and deceit included the following manner and means:

a. The Defendant and co-conspirators used knowingly false claims of election. fraud to get state legislators and election officials to subvert the legitimate election results and change electoral votes for the Defendant's opponent, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., to electoral votes for the Defendant. That is, on the pretext of baseless fraud claims, the Defendant pushed officials in certain states to ignore the popular vote; disenfranchise millions of voters; dismiss legitimate electors; and ultimately, cause the ascertainment of and voting by illegitimate electors in favor of the Defendant.

b. The Defendant and co-conspirators organized fraudulent slates of electors in seven targeted states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin), attempting to mimic the procedures that the legitimate electors were supposed to follow under the Constitution and other federal and state laws. This included causing the fraudulent electors to meet on the day appointed by federal law on which legitimate electors were to gather and cast their votes; cast fraudulent votes for the Defendant; and sign certificates falsely representing that they were legitimate electors. Some fraudulent electors were tricked into participating based on the understanding that their votes would be used only if the Defendant succeeded in outcome-determinative lawsuits within their state, which the Defendant never did. The Defendant and co-conspirators then caused these fraudulent electors to transmit their false certificates to the Page 6 of 45. c. d. e. Vice President and other government officials to be counted at the certification proceeding on January 6. The Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to use the power and authority of the Justice Department to conduct sham election crime investigations and to send a letter to the targeted states that falsely claimed that the Justice Department had identified significant concerns that may have impacted the election outcome; that sought to advance the Defendant's fraudulent elector plan by using the Justice Department's authority to falsely present the fraudulent electors as a valid alternative to the legitimate electors; and that urged, on behalf of the Justice Department, the targeted states' legislatures to convene to create the opportunity to choose the fraudulent electors over the legitimate electors.

The Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to enlist the Vice President to use his ceremonial role at the January 6 certification proceeding to fraudulently alter the election results. First, using knowingly false claims of election fraud, the Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to convince the Vice President to use the Defendant's fraudulent electors, reject legitimate electoral votes, or send legitimate electoral votes to state legislatures for review rather than counting them. When that failed, on the morning of January 6, the Defendant and co-conspirators repeated knowingly false claims of election fraud to gathered supporters, falsely told them that the Vice President had the authority to and might alter the election results, and directed them to the Capitol to obstruct the certification proceeding and exert pressure on the Vice President to take the fraudulent actions he had previously refused.

After it became public on the afternoon of January 6 that the Vice President would not fraudulently alter the election results, a large and angry crowd—including many individuals whom the Defendant had deceived into believing the Vice President could and might change the election results—violently attacked the Capitol and halted the proceeding. As violence ensued, the Defendant and co-conspirators exploited the disruption by redoubling efforts to levy false claims of election fraud and convince Members of Congress to further delay the certification based on those claims.

The Defendant's Knowledge of the Falsity of His Election Fraud Claims

11. The Defendant, his co-conspirators, and their agents made knowingly false claims that there had been outcome-determinative fraud in the 2020 presidential election

whut 250304 ofpbv

 

[Modern Messiah]

ofpbv




whut I say Judge Totenberg’s ruling in 2023 {that Contumacious cites} was not an “outcome determinative“ ruling that was in Donald Trump‘s favor in any way. proving that he had won the 2020 election. Her ruling does not provide cause for the Republican Party’s election fraud, crimes committed in 2021 to be excused or thrown out.

if Contumacious is gong to cite legal cases then he must cite all relevant cases in his argument.

250304 ofpbv

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs DONALD J. TRUMP, and every LAWLESS REPUBLICAN PARTY VOTER WHO CONTINUES TO SUPPORT HIS LAWLESSNESS

VIOLATIONS: Count 1: 18 U.S.C. § 371. (Conspiracy to Defraud the United. States). Count 2: 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k). (Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding). Count 3: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(c)(2), 2 (Obstruction of and Attempt to Obstruct an Official Proceeding) Count 4: 18 U.S.C. § 241. (Conspiracy Against Rights)

Manner and Means

10. The Defendant's conspiracy to impair, obstruct, and defeat the federal government function through dishonesty, fraud, and deceit included the following manner and means:

a. The Defendant and co-conspirators used knowingly false claims of election. fraud to get state legislators and election officials to subvert the legitimate election results and change electoral votes for the Defendant's opponent, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., to electoral votes for the Defendant. That is, on the pretext of baseless fraud claims, the Defendant pushed officials in certain states to ignore the popular vote; disenfranchise millions of voters; dismiss legitimate electors; and ultimately, cause the ascertainment of and voting by illegitimate electors in favor of the Defendant.

b. The Defendant and co-conspirators organized fraudulent slates of electors in seven targeted states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin), attempting to mimic the procedures that the legitimate electors were supposed to follow under the Constitution and other federal and state laws. This included causing the fraudulent electors to meet on the day appointed by federal law on which legitimate electors were to gather and cast their votes; cast fraudulent votes for the Defendant; and sign certificates falsely representing that they were legitimate electors. Some fraudulent electors were tricked into participating based on the understanding that their votes would be used only if the Defendant succeeded in outcome-determinative lawsuits within their state, which the Defendant never did. The Defendant and co-conspirators then caused these fraudulent electors to transmit their false certificates to the Page 6 of 45. c. d. e. Vice President and other government officials to be counted at the certification proceeding on January 6. The Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to use the power and authority of the Justice Department to conduct sham election crime investigations and to send a letter to the targeted states that falsely claimed that the Justice Department had identified significant concerns that may have impacted the election outcome; that sought to advance the Defendant's fraudulent elector plan by using the Justice Department's authority to falsely present the fraudulent electors as a valid alternative to the legitimate electors; and that urged, on behalf of the Justice Department, the targeted states' legislatures to convene to create the opportunity to choose the fraudulent electors over the legitimate electors.

The Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to enlist the Vice President to use his ceremonial role at the January 6 certification proceeding to fraudulently alter the election results. First, using knowingly false claims of election fraud, the Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to convince the Vice President to use the Defendant's fraudulent electors, reject legitimate electoral votes, or send legitimate electoral votes to state legislatures for review rather than counting them. When that failed, on the morning of January 6, the Defendant and co-conspirators repeated knowingly false claims of election fraud to gathered supporters, falsely told them that the Vice President had the authority to and might alter the election results, and directed them to the Capitol to obstruct the certification proceeding and exert pressure on the Vice President to take the fraudulent actions he had previously refused.

After it became public on the afternoon of January 6 that the Vice President would not fraudulently alter the election results, a large and angry crowd—including many individuals whom the Defendant had deceived into believing the Vice President could and might change the election results—violently attacked the Capitol and halted the proceeding. As violence ensued, the Defendant and co-conspirators exploited the disruption by redoubling efforts to levy false claims of election fraud and convince Members of Congress to further delay the certification based on those claims.

The Defendant's Knowledge of the Falsity of His Election Fraud Claims

11. The Defendant, his co-conspirators, and their agents made knowingly false claims that there had been outcome-determinative fraud in the 2020 presidential election

whut 250304 ofpbv

312>226
All swing states
Electoral College
Popular Vote by millions
Nobody cares about your TDS drivel

 

[whutTHEYsay]

200 08 ofpbv …~…. outcome-determinative election fraud in the 2020 presidential election …~… The meaning and relevance of that phrase in a court of law is forbidden to enter the dullard minds of Republican Party voters and aligned Independent dullards who vote against rule of law Democrats in favor of cultural war anti-working class issues such as abortion in the push for a “biblical worldview” having a legitimate role in the functioning of government. ofpbv00208

JUDGE TOTENBERG'S

whut I say CCVIII ~…~ Judge Totenberg’s ruling in 2023 {that Contumacious cites} was not an “outcome determinative“ ruling that was in Donald Trump‘s favor in any way. proving that he had won the 2020 election. Her ruling does not provide cause for the Republican Party’s election fraud, crimes committed in 2021 to be excused or thrown out.

if Contumacious is gong to cite legal cases then he must cite all relevant cases in his argument. ofpbv00208

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs DONALD J. TRUMP, and every LAWLESS REPUBLICAN PARTY VOTER WHO CONTINUES TO SUPPORT HIS LAWLESSNESS

VIOLATIONS: Count 1: 18 U.S.C. § 371. (Conspiracy to Defraud the United. States). Count 2: 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k). (Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding). Count 3: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(c)(2), 2 (Obstruction of and Attempt to Obstruct an Official Proceeding) Count 4: 18 U.S.C. § 241. (Conspiracy Against Rights)

Manner and Means

10. The Defendant's conspiracy to impair, obstruct, and defeat the federal government function through dishonesty, fraud, and deceit included the following manner and means:

a. The Defendant and co-conspirators used knowingly false claims of election. fraud to get state legislators and election officials to subvert the legitimate election results and change electoral votes for the Defendant's opponent, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., to electoral votes for the Defendant. That is, on the pretext of baseless fraud claims, the Defendant pushed officials in certain states to ignore the popular vote; disenfranchise millions of voters; dismiss legitimate electors; and ultimately, cause the ascertainment of and voting by illegitimate electors in favor of the Defendant.

b. The Defendant and co-conspirators organized fraudulent slates of electors in seven targeted states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin), attempting to mimic the procedures that the legitimate electors were supposed to follow under the Constitution and other federal and state laws. This included causing the fraudulent electors to meet on the day appointed by federal law on which legitimate electors were to gather and cast their votes; cast fraudulent votes for the Defendant; and sign certificates falsely representing that they were legitimate electors. Some fraudulent electors were tricked into participating based on the understanding that their votes would be used only if the Defendant succeeded in outcome-determinative lawsuits within their state, which the Defendant never did. The Defendant and co-conspirators then caused these fraudulent electors to transmit their false certificates to the Page 6 of 45. c. d. e. Vice President and other government officials to be counted at the certification proceeding on January 6. The Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to use the power and authority of the Justice Department to conduct sham election crime investigations and to send a letter to the targeted states that falsely claimed that the Justice Department had identified significant concerns that may have impacted the election outcome; that sought to advance the Defendant's fraudulent elector plan by using the Justice Department's authority to falsely present the fraudulent electors as a valid alternative to the legitimate electors; and that urged, on behalf of the Justice Department, the targeted states' legislatures to convene to create the opportunity to choose the fraudulent electors over the legitimate electors.

The Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to enlist the Vice President to use his ceremonial role at the January 6 certification proceeding to fraudulently alter the election results. First, using knowingly false claims of election fraud, the Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to convince the Vice President to use the Defendant's fraudulent electors, reject legitimate electoral votes, or send legitimate electoral votes to state legislatures for review rather than counting them. When that failed, on the morning of January 6, the Defendant and co-conspirators repeated knowingly false claims of election fraud to gathered supporters, falsely told them that the Vice President had the authority to and might alter the election results, and directed them to the Capitol to obstruct the certification proceeding and exert pressure on the Vice President to take the fraudulent actions he had previously refused.

After it became public on the afternoon of January 6 that the Vice President would not fraudulently alter the election results, a large and angry crowd—including many individuals whom the Defendant had deceived into believing the Vice President could and might change the election results—violently attacked the Capitol and halted the proceeding. As violence ensued, the Defendant and co-conspirators exploited the disruption by redoubling efforts to levy false claims of election fraud and convince Members of Congress to further delay the certification based on those claims.

The Defendant's Knowledge of the Falsity of His Election Fraud Claims

11. The Defendant, his co-conspirators, and their agents made knowingly false claims that there had been outcome-determinative fraud in the 2020 presidential election

whut 250304 ofpbv00208

 

[Modern Messiah]

200 08 ofpbv …~…. outcome-determinative election fraud in the 2020 presidential election …~… The meaning and relevance of that phrase in a court of law is forbidden to enter the dullard minds of Republican Party voters and aligned Independent dullards who vote against rule of law Democrats in favor of cultural war anti-working class issues such as abortion in the push for a “biblical worldview” having a legitimate role in the functioning of government. whut 250304 ofpbv00208n




whut I say CCVIII ~…~ Judge Totenberg’s ruling in 2023 {that Contumacious cites} was not an “outcome determinative“ ruling that was in Donald Trump‘s favor in any way. proving that he had won the 2020 election. Her ruling does not provide cause for the Republican Party’s election fraud, crimes committed in 2021 to be excused or thrown out.

if Contumacious is gong to cite legal cases then he must cite all relevant cases in his argument.

250304 ofpbv

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs DONALD J. TRUMP, and every LAWLESS REPUBLICAN PARTY VOTER WHO CONTINUES TO SUPPORT HIS LAWLESSNESS

VIOLATIONS: Count 1: 18 U.S.C. § 371. (Conspiracy to Defraud the United. States). Count 2: 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k). (Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding). Count 3: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(c)(2), 2 (Obstruction of and Attempt to Obstruct an Official Proceeding) Count 4: 18 U.S.C. § 241. (Conspiracy Against Rights)

Manner and Means

10. The Defendant's conspiracy to impair, obstruct, and defeat the federal government function through dishonesty, fraud, and deceit included the following manner and means:

a. The Defendant and co-conspirators used knowingly false claims of election. fraud to get state legislators and election officials to subvert the legitimate election results and change electoral votes for the Defendant's opponent, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., to electoral votes for the Defendant. That is, on the pretext of baseless fraud claims, the Defendant pushed officials in certain states to ignore the popular vote; disenfranchise millions of voters; dismiss legitimate electors; and ultimately, cause the ascertainment of and voting by illegitimate electors in favor of the Defendant.

b. The Defendant and co-conspirators organized fraudulent slates of electors in seven targeted states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin), attempting to mimic the procedures that the legitimate electors were supposed to follow under the Constitution and other federal and state laws. This included causing the fraudulent electors to meet on the day appointed by federal law on which legitimate electors were to gather and cast their votes; cast fraudulent votes for the Defendant; and sign certificates falsely representing that they were legitimate electors. Some fraudulent electors were tricked into participating based on the understanding that their votes would be used only if the Defendant succeeded in outcome-determinative lawsuits within their state, which the Defendant never did. The Defendant and co-conspirators then caused these fraudulent electors to transmit their false certificates to the Page 6 of 45. c. d. e. Vice President and other government officials to be counted at the certification proceeding on January 6. The Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to use the power and authority of the Justice Department to conduct sham election crime investigations and to send a letter to the targeted states that falsely claimed that the Justice Department had identified significant concerns that may have impacted the election outcome; that sought to advance the Defendant's fraudulent elector plan by using the Justice Department's authority to falsely present the fraudulent electors as a valid alternative to the legitimate electors; and that urged, on behalf of the Justice Department, the targeted states' legislatures to convene to create the opportunity to choose the fraudulent electors over the legitimate electors.

The Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to enlist the Vice President to use his ceremonial role at the January 6 certification proceeding to fraudulently alter the election results. First, using knowingly false claims of election fraud, the Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to convince the Vice President to use the Defendant's fraudulent electors, reject legitimate electoral votes, or send legitimate electoral votes to state legislatures for review rather than counting them. When that failed, on the morning of January 6, the Defendant and co-conspirators repeated knowingly false claims of election fraud to gathered supporters, falsely told them that the Vice President had the authority to and might alter the election results, and directed them to the Capitol to obstruct the certification proceeding and exert pressure on the Vice President to take the fraudulent actions he had previously refused.

After it became public on the afternoon of January 6 that the Vice President would not fraudulently alter the election results, a large and angry crowd—including many individuals whom the Defendant had deceived into believing the Vice President could and might change the election results—violently attacked the Capitol and halted the proceeding. As violence ensued, the Defendant and co-conspirators exploited the disruption by redoubling efforts to levy false claims of election fraud and convince Members of Congress to further delay the certification based on those claims.

The Defendant's Knowledge of the Falsity of His Election Fraud Claims

11. The Defendant, his co-conspirators, and their agents made knowingly false claims that there had been outcome-determinative fraud in the 2020 presidential election

whut 250304 ofpbv00208

And there ya go folks!
Another episode of lefties loosing it
312>226

 

[whutTHEYsay]

And there ya go folks!

200 08 ofpbv …~…. outcome-determinative election fraud in the 2020 presidential election …~… The meaning and relevance of that phrase in a court of law is forbidden to enter the dullard minds of Republican Party voters and aligned Independent dullards who vote against rule of law Democrats in favor of cultural war anti-working class issues such as abortion in the push for a “biblical worldview” having a legitimate role in the functioning of government. ofpbv00208

 

[Modern Messiah]

200 08 ofpbv …~…. outcome-determinative election fraud in the 2020 presidential election …~… The meaning and relevance of that phrase in a court of law is forbidden to enter the dullard minds of Republican Party voters and aligned Independent dullards who vote against rule of law Democrats in favor of cultural war anti-working class issues such as abortion in the push for a “biblical worldview” having a legitimate role in the functioning of government. ofpbv00208

Did you hear that the FBI returned the top secret documents that they fraudulently stole from President Trump when they broke into Mara Lago for no reason.
Nobody buys into your leftist TDS driven, lawfare.
Again, 312>226 is the final verdict

 

[whutTHEYsay]

Did you hear that the FBI returned the top secret documents that they fraudulently stole from President Trump when they broke into Mara Lago for no reason.
Nobody buys into your leftist TDS driven, lawfare.
Again, 312>226 is the final verdict

You are a liar and a lawless Republican

You tell me what you know, specifically that was returned.

His golf shoes. His porno tapes that were mixed in with the classified documents scattered all about Mar-a-Lago.

They don’t have to return those Mar-a-Lago keptclassified documents to Putin‘s puppet anymore do they.

Please thank before you post.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

200 08 ofpbv …~…. outcome-determinative election fraud in the 2020 presidential election …~… The meaning and relevance of that phrase in a court of law is forbidden to enter the dullard minds of Republican Party voters and aligned Independent dullards who vote against rule of law Democrats in favor of cultural war anti-working class issues such as abortion in the push for a “biblical worldview” having a legitimate role in the functioning of government. ofpbv00208

TDS

Do you know the difference between “election fraud” and “outcome determinative, election fraud“. Have you seen any evidence presented to a court of law where the Democratic Party, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, any Democrat operatives, leftists, liberal Christians or any city state or federal politician or governor official conspired to produce “outcome determinative election fraud against Donald J Trump for the 2020 presidential election?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Amy Totenberg is a federal judge .

Now from a Constitutional point of view Judicial Review within the meaning of Article III means SCOTUS.

Yes, if she is federal, she has judicial review.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Your low information diatribe speaks volumes about why leftists are so out of touch with reality.
It's all emotion and zero logic.
You know nothing about foreign policy.
You know nothing about diplomatic negotiations.
Yet here you are bloviating your pro war TDS claptrap.
You leftists wanted open borders, Why?
Just to spite President Trump and his supporters.
You destroyed the border, got people killed and now 350,000 children have been trafficked and nobody knows where they are.
Was that good for the country, NO.
All to spite President Trump.
You leftists are doing the same thing here.
Your going to start world war three just out of pure spite.
Your TDS has risen to dangerous levels not only for the USA but the entire world.
Get a grip!

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Your low information diatribe speaks volumes about why leftists are so out of touch with reality.
It's all emotion and zero logic.
You know nothing about foreign policy.
You know nothing about diplomatic negotiations.
Yet here you are bloviating your pro war TDS claptrap.
You leftists wanted open borders, Why?
Just to spite President Trump and his supporters.
You destroyed the border, got people killed and now 350,000 children have been trafficked and nobody knows where they are.
Was that good for the country, NO.
All to spite President Trump.
You leftists are doing the same thing here.
Your going to start world war three just out of pure spite.
Your TDS has risen to dangerous levels not only for the USA but the entire world.
Get a grip!

Your low information diatribe speaks volumes about why leftists are so out of touch with reality.
It's all emotion and zero logic.
You know nothing about foreign policy.
You know nothing about diplomatic negotiations.
Yet here you are bloviating your pro war TDS claptrap.
You leftists wanted open borders, Why?
Just to spite President Trump and his supporters.
You destroyed the border, got people killed and now 350,000 children have been trafficked and nobody knows where they are.
Was that good for the country, NO.
All to spite President Trump.
You leftists are doing the same thing here.
Your going to start world war three just out of pure spite.
Your TDS has risen to dangerous levels not only for the USA but the entire world.
Get a grip!

Your low information diatribe speaks volumes about why leftists are so out of touch with reality.
It's all emotion and zero logic.
You know nothing about foreign policy.
You know nothing about diplomatic negotiations.
Yet here you are bloviating your pro war TDS claptrap.
You leftists wanted open borders, Why?
Just to spite President Trump and his supporters.
You destroyed the border, got people killed and now 350,000 children have been trafficked and nobody knows where they are.
Was that good for the country, NO.
All to spite President Trump.
You leftists are doing the same thing here.
Your going to start world war three just out of pure spite.
Your TDS has risen to dangerous levels not only for the USA but the entire world.
Get a grip!

 

[Contumacious]

200 08 ofpbv …~…. outcome-determinative election fraud in the 2020 presidential election …~… The meaning and relevance of that phrase in a court of law is forbidden to enter the dullard minds of Republican Party voters and aligned Independent dullards who vote against rule of law Democrats in favor of cultural war anti-working class issues such as abortion in the push for a “biblical worldview” having a legitimate role in the functioning of government. ofpbv00208




whut I say CCVIII ~…~ Judge Totenberg’s ruling in 2023 {that Contumacious cites} was not an “outcome determinative“ ruling that was in Donald Trump‘s favor in any way. proving that he had won the 2020 election. Her ruling does not provide cause for the Republican Party’s election fraud, crimes committed in 2021 to be excused or thrown out.

if Contumacious is gong to cite legal cases then he must cite all relevant cases in his argument. ofpbv00208

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs DONALD J. TRUMP, and every LAWLESS REPUBLICAN PARTY VOTER WHO CONTINUES TO SUPPORT HIS LAWLESSNESS

VIOLATIONS: Count 1: 18 U.S.C. § 371. (Conspiracy to Defraud the United. States). Count 2: 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k). (Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding). Count 3: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(c)(2), 2 (Obstruction of and Attempt to Obstruct an Official Proceeding) Count 4: 18 U.S.C. § 241. (Conspiracy Against Rights)

Manner and Means

10. The Defendant's conspiracy to impair, obstruct, and defeat the federal government function through dishonesty, fraud, and deceit included the following manner and means:

a. The Defendant and co-conspirators used knowingly false claims of election. fraud to get state legislators and election officials to subvert the legitimate election results and change electoral votes for the Defendant's opponent, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., to electoral votes for the Defendant. That is, on the pretext of baseless fraud claims, the Defendant pushed officials in certain states to ignore the popular vote; disenfranchise millions of voters; dismiss legitimate electors; and ultimately, cause the ascertainment of and voting by illegitimate electors in favor of the Defendant.

b. The Defendant and co-conspirators organized fraudulent slates of electors in seven targeted states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin), attempting to mimic the procedures that the legitimate electors were supposed to follow under the Constitution and other federal and state laws. This included causing the fraudulent electors to meet on the day appointed by federal law on which legitimate electors were to gather and cast their votes; cast fraudulent votes for the Defendant; and sign certificates falsely representing that they were legitimate electors. Some fraudulent electors were tricked into participating based on the understanding that their votes would be used only if the Defendant succeeded in outcome-determinative lawsuits within their state, which the Defendant never did. The Defendant and co-conspirators then caused these fraudulent electors to transmit their false certificates to the Page 6 of 45. c. d. e. Vice President and other government officials to be counted at the certification proceeding on January 6. The Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to use the power and authority of the Justice Department to conduct sham election crime investigations and to send a letter to the targeted states that falsely claimed that the Justice Department had identified significant concerns that may have impacted the election outcome; that sought to advance the Defendant's fraudulent elector plan by using the Justice Department's authority to falsely present the fraudulent electors as a valid alternative to the legitimate electors; and that urged, on behalf of the Justice Department, the targeted states' legislatures to convene to create the opportunity to choose the fraudulent electors over the legitimate electors.

The Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to enlist the Vice President to use his ceremonial role at the January 6 certification proceeding to fraudulently alter the election results. First, using knowingly false claims of election fraud, the Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to convince the Vice President to use the Defendant's fraudulent electors, reject legitimate electoral votes, or send legitimate electoral votes to state legislatures for review rather than counting them. When that failed, on the morning of January 6, the Defendant and co-conspirators repeated knowingly false claims of election fraud to gathered supporters, falsely told them that the Vice President had the authority to and might alter the election results, and directed them to the Capitol to obstruct the certification proceeding and exert pressure on the Vice President to take the fraudulent actions he had previously refused.

After it became public on the afternoon of January 6 that the Vice President would not fraudulently alter the election results, a large and angry crowd—including many individuals whom the Defendant had deceived into believing the Vice President could and might change the election results—violently attacked the Capitol and halted the proceeding. As violence ensued, the Defendant and co-conspirators exploited the disruption by redoubling efforts to levy false claims of election fraud and convince Members of Congress to further delay the certification based on those claims.

The Defendant's Knowledge of the Falsity of His Election Fraud Claims

11. The Defendant, his co-conspirators, and their agents made knowingly false claims that there had been outcome-determinative fraud in the 2020 presidential election

whut 250304 ofpbv00208

SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU STUPID DINGLEBERRY

READ JUDGE TOTENBERG'S OPINION THEN WEEP - QueMala Lied to you


The evidence before the Court shows that voting machines are hackable and votes can be changed from one party to another in real time without leaving a trace of evidence " Federal Judge Amy Totenberg , Curling v Raffensperger , Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-2989 -AT . ND Georgia, Atlanta Division November 10, 2023
Curling v. Raffensperger, 403 F. Supp. 3d 1311 | Casetext Search + Citator

 

[Contumacious]

whut I say Judge Totenberg’s ruling in 2023 {that Contumacious cites} was not an “outcome determinative“ ruling that was in Donald Trump‘s favor in any way. proving that he had won the 2020 election. Her ruling does not provide cause for the Republican Party’s election fraud, crimes committed in 2021 to be excused or thrown out.

Yo Dingle Berry

the case is relevant in that it proves beyond a reasonable doubt that voting machines are hackable and votes can be changed from one party to another in real time without leaving a trace of evidence .


The Socialist Demon Rats can not hide behind the "outcome determinative " fiction while refusing to audit elections !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!