Oregon SETTLES federal election lawsuit with Judicial Watch. Agrees to remove up to 800,000 dirty names from voter rolls.

PROOF YOU DOLTS JUST HIT & RUN WITHOUT EVEN READING SOURCES LINKED TO ANY GIVEN SUBJECT WE FIND YOU ALL FLAILING ABOUT ON

In its complaint, Judicial Watch argued that Oregon’s voter rolls contain large numbers of old, inactive registrations; and that 29 of Oregon’s 36 counties removed few or no registrations as required by federal election law. Judicial Watch asserted that Oregon and 35 of its counties had overall registration rates exceeding 100%; and that Oregon had the highest known inactive registration rate of any state in the nation. In combination, all of these facts showed that Oregon was failing to remove inactive registrations as required by federal law.

In August 2025, a federal court in Oregon denied a motion to dismiss by Oregon and ruled the lawsuit could proceed.

In response to the lawsuit, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read announced earlier this year that Oregon has about 800,000 inactive registrations, which are kept separately from the active voter rolls and do not receive ballots. Of those, roughly 160,000 already meet federal and state criteria for removal—having received confirmation notices, failed to respond, and not voted in two federal elections—and are slated for cancellation. The remaining approximately 640,000 inactive records do not yet qualify for removal and will be processed through future list maintenance efforts.

In its press release, Oregon acknowledged that routine removal of outdated records effectively stalled in 2017, leaving a large pool of long-dormant registrations on the rolls without being fully processed for removal. The scale of the backlog underscores a gap in routine list maintenance that is only now being addressed. ā€œThese directives are about cleaning up old data that’s no longer in use so Oregonians can be confident that our voter records are up to date,ā€ said Read.



This is also about a "Settlement" not a 'win' in the way these narratives suggest. Oregon did not lose anything.

The deceptive narratives by Judicial Watch make you all out to look like fools -- like FOX and Tucker did with the voting machines bs that cost FOX around a BILLION dollars.

JW knew that Oregon " kept separately from the active voter rolls and do not receive ballots"


And I'd tell this one to try and keep up, but this one is an egregious offender in the Hit & Run Post catergory
Nowhere in your post does it say WHY you want to keep nonvoters or people that have moved on the registary
 
PROOF YOU DOLTS JUST HIT & RUN WITHOUT EVEN READING SOURCES LINKED TO ANY GIVEN SUBJECT WE FIND YOU ALL FLAILING ABOUT ON

In its complaint, Judicial Watch argued that Oregon’s voter rolls contain large numbers of old, inactive registrations; and that 29 of Oregon’s 36 counties removed few or no registrations as required by federal election law. Judicial Watch asserted that Oregon and 35 of its counties had overall registration rates exceeding 100%; and that Oregon had the highest known inactive registration rate of any state in the nation. In combination, all of these facts showed that Oregon was failing to remove inactive registrations as required by federal law.

In August 2025, a federal court in Oregon denied a motion to dismiss by Oregon and ruled the lawsuit could proceed.

In response to the lawsuit, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read announced earlier this year that Oregon has about 800,000 inactive registrations, which are kept separately from the active voter rolls and do not receive ballots. Of those, roughly 160,000 already meet federal and state criteria for removal—having received confirmation notices, failed to respond, and not voted in two federal elections—and are slated for cancellation. The remaining approximately 640,000 inactive records do not yet qualify for removal and will be processed through future list maintenance efforts.

In its press release, Oregon acknowledged that routine removal of outdated records effectively stalled in 2017, leaving a large pool of long-dormant registrations on the rolls without being fully processed for removal. The scale of the backlog underscores a gap in routine list maintenance that is only now being addressed. ā€œThese directives are about cleaning up old data that’s no longer in use so Oregonians can be confident that our voter records are up to date,ā€ said Read.



This is also about a "Settlement" not a 'win' in the way these narratives suggest. Oregon did not lose anything.

The deceptive narratives by Judicial Watch make you all out to look like fools -- like FOX and Tucker did with the voting machines bs that cost FOX around a BILLION dollars.

JW knew that Oregon " kept separately from the active voter rolls and do not receive ballots"


And I'd tell this one to try and keep up, but this one is an egregious offender in the Hit & Run Post catergory
Oregon lost a bunch of names they fought to keep on their voter list.
 
Winning. One state at a time.

MAGA.






Hey, that's not fair! How are the dead supposed to vote for democrats now?
 
Hey, that's not fair! How are the dead supposed to vote for democrats now?
The same whey the Repubs do it, kill..

Colorado man suspected in wife's death cast ballot for ...​

1777567360950.webp
NBC News
https://www.nbcnews.com › news › us-news › colorado...




May 14, 2021 — Barry Morphew told investigators he mailed the ballot on behalf of his wife, Suzanne Morphew, to help Trump win, sayingā€œ all these other guys ...Read more
 
Nowhere in your post does it say WHY you want to keep nonvoters or people that have moved on the registary
Good gawd, are you really this imbecilic and ignorant?

The posts from the linked article clearly state" kept separately from the active voter rolls and do not receive ballots...and that...Oregon acknowledged that routine removal of outdated records effectively stalled in 2017, leaving a large pool of long-dormant registrations on the rolls without being fully processed for removal.
 
Hey, that's not fair! How are the dead supposed to vote for democrats now?
Well they couldn't there.

Why?

try and read what it is you are commenting on and stop imagining things

kept separately from the active voter rolls and do not receive ballots. Of those, roughly 160,000 already meet federal and state criteria for removal—having received confirmation notices, failed to respond, and not voted in two federal elections—and are slated for cancellation. The remaining approximately 640,000 inactive records do not yet qualify for removal and will be processed through future list maintenance efforts.

In its press release, Oregon acknowledged that routine removal of outdated records effectively stalled in 2017, leaving a large pool of long-dormant registrations on the rolls without being fully processed for removal.
 
Well while we're waiting for the great unwashed horde of liberals to show up in this thread and gnash their teeth, I must confess: I hate the food network, especially those stupid cooking competitions they have on there. Everyone in them is weird, gay, liberal, or ethic. The screeching, the background music, the tension...it all drives me nucking futz. My wife is always watching those shows but she never cooks anything but the same stuff.

Please don't tell her I said this.

But before I go off topic, here's something relevant to this thread:

https://www.statesmanjournal.com/st...-lawsuit-resolved-judicial-watch/89862139007/
Democrats have you by your balls when you say they are liberals. A true liberal is not spiteful, not harmful, and works daily for the betterment of the citizens. Democrats shut down government, demand cops lose their jobs, work to keep illegals from being exported and way worse. I refuse to call any Democraet a liberal.
 
Good gawd, are you really this imbecilic and ignorant?

The posts from the linked article clearly state" kept separately from the active voter rolls and do not receive ballots...and that...Oregon acknowledged that routine removal of outdated records effectively stalled in 2017, leaving a large pool of long-dormant registrations on the rolls without being fully processed for removal.
That doesn’t answer as to why…
 
15th post
Oregon mails out a ballot to every registered voters.

Oregon was just ordered to remove 800,000 voters from their registration list who are either no longer alive, or no longer live in Oregon.

So 800,000 ballots have been released "into the wild" each election cycle by having been mailed to people who don't vote.

What is the safeguard against those ballots being fraudulently cast?


 
Back
Top Bottom