Oregon SETTLES federal election lawsuit with Judicial Watch. Agrees to remove up to 800,000 dirty names from voter rolls.

[Dante]

so what is it dante?....

try and pay attention then we'll address how you can catch up, O'Tay?

 

[Dante]

Judicial Watch is a national treasure. ​

New Flash: "Trump has repeatedly cited false claims by Judicial Watch about voter fraud. Various courts have dismissed the vast majority of its lawsuits."

 

[Dante]

Then why fight to keep them on the voter rolls?

Keep the names? You keep commenting on this, yet you don't what the state of Oregon said about this?

 

[Dante]

Why do the left want these names on the rolls? Why do they ***** about taking them off? Why do we even need a court order or a settlement to take names off the rolls that even you agree don't need to be on there?

Where did the state of Oregon suggest that they want those names to be active?

You too, don't know what you are commenting on?

Just Troll along with Headlines?

 

[Dante]

We do know how it works. Progressives may still win, at least the Republican complaints will dwindle if all potential avenues of cheating are tempered. There may be more.

The imaginary 'cheating' will not disappear. If it did, the GOP would lose an ability to drive dooshbags like you to the polls.

 

[Dante]

How dare they deny 400,000 dead people and 400,000 people named "Jose" the right to vote in our elections?

This is Jim Crow 2.0. Jim Crow 2.0 I tell you!

Larry Klayman lawsuits

WIKIPDEIA entry:
In 2003, Judicial Watch founder Larry Klayman left the organization to run for the United States Senate from Florida.[75] In 2006, Klayman sued Judicial Watch and its president, Tom Fitton. Judicial Watch asserted several claims against Klayman as well; in 2019, Judicial Watch obtained a $2.8 million verdict against Klayman on its claims of breaches of the severance agreement and trademark infringement.[76]

In 2012, a Judicial Watch employee falsely told Orly Taitz that Klayman had been convicted of not paying child support (Klayman had been indicted, but the charges were later dismissed). Taitz then published the employee's comment on her website. Klayman sued Judicial Watch for defamation, and in 2014, a federal jury awarded Klayman $156,000 in compensatory damages and $25,000 in punitive damages.[77]

In 2017, Freedom Watch (Klayman's successor organization to Judicial Watch) unsuccessfully sued Judicial Watch and the American Conservative Union (ACU), alleging they violated the Sherman Act by colluding to prevent Freedom Watch from participating at the ACU's Conservative Political Action Conference.[78]

Klayman had represented three individuals who sued Judicial Watch, his former employer and client, but he failed to obtain Judicial Watch's consent to waive his conflict of interest. Klayman maintained that the D.C. Bar had "recognized there was no evidence of dishonesty or personal gain".[79] In 2020, however, the D.C. Court of Appeals suspended Klayman's license for 90 days and ordered him to complete a class on legal ethics.[80]

 

[Independent thinker]

Where did the state of Oregon suggest that they want those names to be active?

You too, don't know what you are commenting on?

Just Troll along with Headlines?

They fought it. They had to be taken to court to remove the names.

 

[struth]

You can read why. Or are you once more jumping into something you know so little about?

I guess I am, hence why I asked the question as to why you all would want voter rolls loaded up with people that no longer live there or vote

 

[Dante]

Activities and controversies

Judicial Watch's main targets have been Democrats, particularly Bill and Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration.[22]
Commerce Department trade mission scandal
Main article: Commerce Department trade mission controversy

In 1995, Judicial Watch, Inc. filed an action in the District Court under the FOIA, seeking information from the Department of Commerce (DOC) regarding DOC's selection of participants for foreign trade missions. In May 1995, following a search in response to Judicial Watch's FOIA requests, DOC produced approximately 28,000 pages of nonexempt information and withheld about 1,000 documents as exempt. Disputes arose between the parties over the adequacy of DOC's search, and Judicial Watch charged that some DOC officials had destroyed or removed responsive documents. In December 1998, following discovery, the District Court granted partial summary judgment to Judicial Watch and ordered DOC to perform a new search.[23] During the investigation, Nolanda B. Hill, a business partner of Commerce Secretary Ron Brown testified that Brown had told her that first lady Hillary Clinton was the driving force behind the efforts to raise as much money as possible for President Clinton's reelection and the DNC. And further that, "...companies were being solicited to donate large sums of money in exchange for their selection to participate on trade missions of the Commerce Department."[24]

Vince Foster conspiracy theory

False Nancy Pelosi claims

Operation Neptune Spear

Bill Clinton/Taylor Branch tapes

Kennedy assassination records

Hillary Clinton email lawsuits

False claims about George Zimmerman protests

Islamic State in Mexico scares

Murder of Seth Rich conspiracy theory

False voter fraud claims

Fitton's claim by linking to official voter registration data.[55][56]

False claims about Trump Nazi billboard

Lawsuits against climate scientists

Mueller and FBI investigations into Russian interference

Accusations against the Clinton Foundation

George Soros smears

Senator's letters to IRS

2020 election voter suppression

Statue removal
Judicial Watch has sought to remove a statue of Mexican revolutionary Pancho Villa from downtown Tucson.[73] Judicial Watch said the statue "needs to go" because "Pancho Villa did great harm to people."[73]

Judicial Watch - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Dante]

They fought it. They had to be taken to court to remove the names.

Not quote that simple.

So, you don't know what the arguments were. Okay.

Hit & Run with HEadlines

 

[DigitalDrifter]

For whatever reason Oregon stopped the routine cleanup of outdated or inactive voter registration records in 2017.
Because of that, there has been a buildup of hundreds of thousands of inactive voter records, which now apparently will be removed.

 

[Dante]

For whatever reason Oregon stopped the routine cleanup of outdated or inactive voter registration records in 2017.
Because of that, there has been a buildup of hundreds of thousands of inactive voter records, which now apparently will be removed.

So it's nothing like JW and it's disturbed following is presenting it as?

thank you

 

[jknowgood]

Keep the names? You keep commenting on this, yet you don't what the state of Oregon said about this?

You loons don't want anything done with voter rolls. That way you can cheat as much as you like.

 

[Dante]

Winning. One state at a time.

MAGA.

Judicial Watch Lawsuit Settlement Causes Review and Removal of 800,000 Ineligible Voters from Oregon Voter Rolls - Judicial Watch

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced a settlement in its federal lawsuit against Oregon election officials, which confirms 800,000 ineligible voter names are slated for review and removal from voter registration lists. The settlement requires state officials to produce detailed data and...

www.judicialwatch.org

How dare they deny 400,000 dead people and 400,000 people named "Jose" the right to vote in our elections?

This is Jim Crow 2.0. Jim Crow 2.0 I tell you!

Doing the hard work to fix what's broken in our election system.

I guess I am, hence why I asked the question as to why you all would want voter rolls loaded up with people that no longer live there or vote

PROOF YOU DOLTS JUST HIT & RUN WITHOUT EVEN READING SOURCES LINKED TO ANY GIVEN SUBJECT WE FIND YOU ALL FLAILING ABOUT ON

In its complaint, Judicial Watch argued that Oregon’s voter rolls contain large numbers of old, inactive registrations; and that 29 of Oregon’s 36 counties removed few or no registrations as required by federal election law. Judicial Watch asserted that Oregon and 35 of its counties had overall registration rates exceeding 100%; and that Oregon had the highest known inactive registration rate of any state in the nation. In combination, all of these facts showed that Oregon was failing to remove inactive registrations as required by federal law.

In August 2025, a federal court in Oregon denied a motion to dismiss by Oregon and ruled the lawsuit could proceed.

In response to the lawsuit, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read announced earlier this year that Oregon has about 800,000 inactive registrations, which are kept separately from the active voter rolls and do not receive ballots. Of those, roughly 160,000 already meet federal and state criteria for removal—having received confirmation notices, failed to respond, and not voted in two federal elections—and are slated for cancellation. The remaining approximately 640,000 inactive records do not yet qualify for removal and will be processed through future list maintenance efforts.

In its press release, Oregon acknowledged that routine removal of outdated records effectively stalled in 2017, leaving a large pool of long-dormant registrations on the rolls without being fully processed for removal. The scale of the backlog underscores a gap in routine list maintenance that is only now being addressed. “These directives are about cleaning up old data that’s no longer in use so Oregonians can be confident that our voter records are up to date,” said Read.

They fought it. They had to be taken to court to remove the names.

This is also about a "Settlement" not a 'win' in the way these narratives suggest. Oregon did not lose anything.

The deceptive narratives by Judicial Watch make you all out to look like fools -- like FOX and Tucker did with the voting machines bs that cost FOX around a BILLION dollars.

JW knew that Oregon " kept separately from the active voter rolls and do not receive ballots"


And I'd tell this one to try and keep up, but this one is an egregious offender in the Hit & Run Post catergory

You loons don't want anything done with voter rolls. That way you can cheat as much as you like.

 

[wamose]

"Dirty names?"

Much bullshit. People are still clueless. Names removed from the voter rolls does not equal voters. Lots of names on voters rolls that have not been used in elections.

You can bet that the DNC has the full list of illegally registered voters, and they submit fraudulent mail in ballots for all of them. You can also bet that if they admit to 800K illegal voters, there's probably more like 1.5 million.

 

[Dante]

wamose

"You can bet that the DNC has the full list of illegally registered voters, and they submit fraudulent mail in ballots for all of them. You can also bet that if they admit to 800K illegal voters, there's probably more like 1.5million."

In response to the lawsuit, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read announced earlier this year that Oregon has about 800,000 inactive registrations, which are kept separately from the active voter rolls and do not receive ballots. Of those, roughly 160,000 already meet federal and state criteria for removal—having received confirmation notices, failed to respond, and not voted in two federal elections—and are slated for cancellation. The remaining approximately 640,000 inactive records do not yet qualify for removal and will be processed through future list maintenance efforts.

try and keep up by first reading what it is you believe you commenting on

 

[wamose]

wamose

"You can bet that the DNC has the full list of illegally registered voters, and they submit fraudulent mail in ballots for all of them. You can also bet that if they admit to 800K illegal voters, there's probably more like 1.5million."


try and keep up by first reading what it is you believe you commenting on

Your problem is, you fall for Democrat jive every time. "I didn't inhale. I didn't have sex with that woman. If you like your plan, you can keep your plan." You monkey see, monkey doers believe anything.

 

[Dante]

Your problem is, you fall for Democrat jive every time. "I didn't inhale. I didn't have sex with that woman. If you like your plan, you can keep your plan." You monkey see, monkey doers believe anything.

Details of the Deposition Exchange

• The Photo: Carroll's lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, showed Trump a black-and-white photo from the 1980s featuring Trump, his first wife Ivana Trump, E. Jean Carroll, and her then-husband John Johnson.
• The Misidentification: When asked to identify the woman in the photo, Trump replied: “It's Marla... That's Marla, yeah. That's my wife”.

 

[Harry Dresden]

try and pay attention then we'll address how you can catch up, O'Tay?

so its all just dante talk....

 

[Independent thinker]

Not quote that simple.

So, you don't know what the arguments were. Okay.

Hit & Run with HEadlines

So, now you're admitting that Oregon fought it after claiming they didn't fight it.