By saying the same thing in this post after I proved you wrong (using facts), you are proving my point. Thanks!Democrats think that cherry picked facts prove their case and deny all other facts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
By saying the same thing in this post after I proved you wrong (using facts), you are proving my point. Thanks!Democrats think that cherry picked facts prove their case and deny all other facts.
You list all the very same BS crime solutions which brought us the high crime in the first place. We wouldn't have high crime in the cities if democrats hadn't let crime get out of control in the first place. Now we have to come down with a hammer because, even now, democrats refuse to rein in their crime. To you it's all about criminal's rights and social injustice. Meanwhile, 81% of Americans are just plain fed up with all the crime and don't want to hear "but crime is down" as it still rages on.You obviously didn’t read what I wrote if that’s your reply
Curfews could possibly be necessary at times under certain circumstances but if the criminals were already locked up, we wouldn't need curfews then, would we? If we kept criminals off the streets we wouldn't need to try to keep guns away from them. Why let criminals wander the streets, even if they don't have guns? Why infringe on the 2A rights of law abiding citizens in an impossible attempt to keep guns away from people who shouldn't be wandering around freely in the first place? That's just stupid. Seeems to me I vaguely remember we tried outlawing alcohol before. How'd that work out? I still find it crazy you want to outlaw alcohol but drugs are OK. How stupid is that?Happy to arrest the criminals. I haven’t made an argument that says otherwise. You completely dodge my question btw. Would you support curfews, gun bans, and making alcohol illegal as we move our military to the streets?
Didn't we try outlawing alcohol once? Why double down on something that has already been proven not to work?Well there we go. The effects of alcohol are very similar to that of drugs and it is a common element in many crimes. So eliminate drugs and alcohol. Crack down on anybody in possession of either and then crime goes down. Do you support that?
But bail is racist, just like math is.Dang, how militant of you. How about arresting and punishing the criminals. Cashless bail doesn't seem to be working.
Curfews could possibly be necessary at times under certain circumstances but if the criminals were already locked up, we wouldn't need curfews then, would we? If we kept criminals off the streets we wouldn't need to try to keep guns away from them. Why let criminals wander the streets, even if they don't have guns? Why infringe on the 2A rights of law abiding citizens in an impossible attempt to keep guns away from people who shouldn't be wandering around freely in the first place? That's just stupid. Seeems to me I vaguely remember we tried outlawing alcohol before. How'd that work out? I still find it crazy you want to outlaw alcohol but drugs are OK. How stupid is that?
Another evasive answer. Do you support curfews,You list all the very same BS crime solutions which brought us the high crime in the first place. We wouldn't have high crime in the cities if democrats hadn't let crime get out of control in the first place. Now we have to come down with a hammer because, even now, democrats refuse to rein in their crime. To you it's all about criminal's rights and social injustice. Meanwhile, 81% of Americans are just plain fed up with all the crime and don't want to hear "but crime is down" as it still rages on.
well we need to get them locked up first, right? That’s not something that happens over night. So why not ban guns, institute curfews, ban alcohol, and put police, military and cameras everywhere until crime is gone? Is that a plan you’de support?Curfews could possibly be necessary at times under certain circumstances but if the criminals were already locked up, we wouldn't need curfews then, would we? If we kept criminals off the streets we wouldn't need to try to keep guns away from them. Why let criminals wander the streets, even if they don't have guns? Why infringe on the 2A rights of law abiding citizens in an impossible attempt to keep guns away from people who shouldn't be wandering around freely in the first place? That's just stupid. Seeems to me I vaguely remember we tried outlawing alcohol before. How'd that work out? I still find it crazy you want to outlaw alcohol but drugs are OK. How stupid is that?
Clamoring to have to ask Big Daddy governments permission to go out after dark......
I answered the curfew question. Sometimes they're necessary, depending on the individual situation. I don't favor them everywhere all the time. No one does.Another evasive answer. Do you support curfews,
well we need to get them locked up first, right? That’s not something that happens over night. So why not ban guns, institute curfews, ban alcohol, and put police, military and cameras everywhere until crime is gone? Is that a plan you’de support?
And yet this is EXACTLY what the left did during Covid where we had to get big daddy's permission to go out in public by getting vaccinated.
We had to show big daddy our papers or we couldn't go to work, school, church, or even to the grocery store without big daddy's approval. On top of that, we couldn't even have 10 friends and family over to our houses because big daddy wouldn't approve and friends, family, and neighbors were encouraged to rat them out for having a get together, just as they did in Hitler's Gestapo.
Did you get vaccinated?Never happened to me. I'm not aware of it happening to anyone.
You lived in some alternative state than me I suppose.
Did you get vaccinated?
JD Vance today in Wisconsin spoke of his and Trumps desire that the Elected Democrats join Trump in providing safety in cities.81% of Americans say that crime in the cities is out of control. It is out of control because of democrats being soft on crime.
But you did not want the shot, correct?Once....late.....the Republican governor of Ohio said I couldn't go to a concert without it.
Newsom just announced he was getting tough on crime in California.JD Vance today in Wisconsin spoke of his and Trumps desire that the Elected Democrats join Trump in providing safety in cities.
I’m not talking about everywhere, just places where there is crime and only keeping it until there is no more crime. What that be agreeable to you ?I answered the curfew question. Sometimes they're necessary, depending on the individual situation. I don't favor them everywhere all the time. No one does.
How about we just do what Trump is doing? That seems to be working fine.I’m not talking about everywhere, just places where there is crime and only keeping it until there is no more crime. What that be agreeable to you ?
I disagree. What Trump is doing is a show. Not a long term fix. It’s anti democratic and authoritarian in nature. I don’t know about you but I’m not looking to go down the commie road which is exactly where Trump is taking us.How about we just do what Trump is doing? That seems to be working fine.
Actually you are incorrect in your assumptions. There was a crime problem in DC and Trump is fixing it using the tools at hand. You don't like it because you don't like anything Trump does. It is your TDS. Too bad, so sad.I disagree. What Trump is doing is a show. Not a long term fix. It’s anti democratic and authoritarian in nature. I don’t know about you but I’m not looking to go down the commie road which is exactly where Trump is taking us.
There is a crime problem in most American cities. That’s what happens in population centers and impoverished areas. I’m wondering why governors of res states are sending their National Guard troops to help in DC when they could be deploying them to their own cities. If this commie militant tactic is the magic formula to fighting crime that the right is supporting now why are all the red states doing it. There are plenty that have high crime cities than DCActually you are incorrect in your assumptions. There was a crime problem in DC and Trump is fixing it using the tools at hand. You don't like it because you don't like anything Trump does. It is your TDS. Too bad, so sad.