One of the unintended, or perhaps very much intended, consequences of the proposed Equality Act is scaring women and gays out of their wits!

[johnwk]

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

It is the only "equality act" we ever needed from Intelligent Design and inception.

AND:

2. “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.”


This wording forbids State action from abridging a United States citizen’s “privileges or immunities” which a State has adopted under law. Note that the wording does not forbid a State to deny “privileges or immunities” to “persons” who may not be "citizens of the United States"! Nor does the wording declare what “privileges or immunities” a state may or may not adopt.

JWK

 

[danielpalos]

Equal protection of the at-will employment laws in our at-will employment States!

 

[johnwk]

Equal protection of the at-will employment laws in our at-will employment States!

 

[danielpalos]

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

A person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the laws

 

[johnwk]

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

A person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the laws

I don't understand what that has to do with the consequences of the "Equality Act" which attempts to adopt and enforce legislation forbidding distinctions being made based upon sex, a delegation of power that was rejected by the American people when the Equal Rights amendment was rejected.

The most recent wording of the Equal Rights Amendment reads as follows:

'Article--


'Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

'Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

'Section 3. This article shall take effect 2 years after the date of ratification.'


The delegations of such power being rejected by the American people!

JWK


The Equality Act attempts to exercise legislative power proposed under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, the Act is an attempted usurpation of power not granted.

 

[BlueGin]

If women haven’t figured out by now that to democrats they are just “ birthing people”. They are dumber than a box of rocks.

 

[danielpalos]

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

A person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the laws

View attachment 500382


I don't understand what that has to do with the consequences of the "Equality Act" which attempts to adopt and enforce legislation forbidding distinctions being made based upon sex, a delegation of power that was rejected by the American people when the Equal Rights amendment was rejected.

The most recent wording of the Equal Rights Amendment reads as follows:

'Article--


'Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

'Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

'Section 3. This article shall take effect 2 years after the date of ratification.'


The delegations of such power being rejected by the American people!

JWK


The Equality Act attempts to exercise legislative power proposed under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, the Act is an attempted usurpation of power not granted.

Equal protection of at-will employment laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States to promote and provide for the general welfare by solving for simple poverty in a market friendly manner. .

 

[johnwk]

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

A person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the laws

View attachment 500382


I don't understand what that has to do with the consequences of the "Equality Act" which attempts to adopt and enforce legislation forbidding distinctions being made based upon sex, a delegation of power that was rejected by the American people when the Equal Rights amendment was rejected.

The most recent wording of the Equal Rights Amendment reads as follows:

'Article--


'Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

'Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

'Section 3. This article shall take effect 2 years after the date of ratification.'


The delegations of such power being rejected by the American people!

JWK


The Equality Act attempts to exercise legislative power proposed under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, the Act is an attempted usurpation of power not granted.

Equal protection of at-will employment laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States to promote and provide for the general welfare by solving for simple poverty in a market friendly manner. .

You are not making any sense in response to what I posted above. It appears you are either incapable of having an intelligent dialogue, or intentionally avoiding one.


JWK

 

[danielpalos]

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

A person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the laws

View attachment 500382


I don't understand what that has to do with the consequences of the "Equality Act" which attempts to adopt and enforce legislation forbidding distinctions being made based upon sex, a delegation of power that was rejected by the American people when the Equal Rights amendment was rejected.

The most recent wording of the Equal Rights Amendment reads as follows:

'Article--


'Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

'Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

'Section 3. This article shall take effect 2 years after the date of ratification.'


The delegations of such power being rejected by the American people!

JWK


The Equality Act attempts to exercise legislative power proposed under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, the Act is an attempted usurpation of power not granted.

Equal protection of at-will employment laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States to promote and provide for the general welfare by solving for simple poverty in a market friendly manner. .

You are not making any sense in response to what I posted above. It appears you are either incapable of having an intelligent dialogue, or intentionally avoiding one.


JWK

You have no sense or you would ask questions if you have no valid rebuttal.

 

[johnwk]

You have no sense or you would ask questions if you have no valid rebuttal.

I see you offered no rebuttal to what I posted above:


I don't understand what that has to do with the consequences of the "Equality Act" which attempts to adopt and enforce legislation forbidding distinctions being made based upon sex, a delegation of power that was rejected by the American people when the Equal Rights amendment was rejected.

The most recent wording of the Equal Rights Amendment reads as follows:

'Article--


'Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

'Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

'Section 3. This article shall take effect 2 years after the date of ratification.'


The delegations of such power being rejected by the American people!

JWK


The Equality Act attempts to exercise legislative power proposed under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, the Act is an attempted usurpation of power not granted.

 

[danielpalos]

This is the only Equality Act we ever needed:

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

 

[hadit]

Show us the express clause over the whole and entire concept of Immigration in our federal Constitution right-wingers; don't merely be immoral false witness bearers as is your customary and usual habit on the right-wing.

Now you want to go down your rabbit trail of immigration. Can you not find anything that relates to the discussion at hand?

Only hypocrites blame the less fortunate for their "illegality".

You become an illegal immigrant when you break the law coming into the nation. Is there any other way to look at it?

 

[hadit]

Show us the express clause over the whole and entire concept of Immigration in our federal Constitution right-wingers; don't merely be immoral false witness bearers as is your customary and usual habit on the right-wing.

Have you been drinking? Your post makes no sense whatsoever.

BTW, in case you missed it, the subject of the thread concerns the Equality Act.

JWK


The Equality Act attempts to exercise legislative power proposed under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, the Act is an attempted usurpation of power not granted.

You need to resort to the fewest fallacies to be worth equal for pay purposes.

No, actually, you do not. Where did you get that idea?

lol. Because sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation matters.

Which means nothing when it comes to work being worth a certain amount. A person does not determine a wage, his/her work does. And yes, Daniel, that means that women are your equals.

 

[hadit]

Equal protection of the at-will employment laws in our at-will employment States!

View attachment 500227

Yet another of Daniel's favorites that he will repeat endlessly. What he really means is that he should be able to collect Unemployment simply because he's not working, not because he got laid off.

 

[johnwk]

This is the only Equality Act we ever needed:

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Which allows people to be free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations, and that includes their social and commercial activities.
JWK

The Equality Act attempts to exercise legislative power proposed under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, the Act is an attempted usurpation of power not granted.

 

[hadit]

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

A person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the laws

View attachment 500382


I don't understand what that has to do with the consequences of the "Equality Act" which attempts to adopt and enforce legislation forbidding distinctions being made based upon sex, a delegation of power that was rejected by the American people when the Equal Rights amendment was rejected.

The most recent wording of the Equal Rights Amendment reads as follows:

'Article--


'Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

'Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

'Section 3. This article shall take effect 2 years after the date of ratification.'


The delegations of such power being rejected by the American people!

JWK


The Equality Act attempts to exercise legislative power proposed under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, the Act is an attempted usurpation of power not granted.

Equal protection of at-will employment laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States to promote and provide for the general welfare by solving for simple poverty in a market friendly manner. .

You are not making any sense in response to what I posted above. It appears you are either incapable of having an intelligent dialogue, or intentionally avoiding one.


JWK

He's trying to pull you into one of the (very few) things he actually wants to talk about. Beware, there lie monsters.

 

[hadit]

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

A person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the laws

View attachment 500382


I don't understand what that has to do with the consequences of the "Equality Act" which attempts to adopt and enforce legislation forbidding distinctions being made based upon sex, a delegation of power that was rejected by the American people when the Equal Rights amendment was rejected.

The most recent wording of the Equal Rights Amendment reads as follows:

'Article--


'Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

'Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

'Section 3. This article shall take effect 2 years after the date of ratification.'


The delegations of such power being rejected by the American people!

JWK


The Equality Act attempts to exercise legislative power proposed under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, the Act is an attempted usurpation of power not granted.

Equal protection of at-will employment laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States to promote and provide for the general welfare by solving for simple poverty in a market friendly manner. .

You are not making any sense in response to what I posted above. It appears you are either incapable of having an intelligent dialogue, or intentionally avoiding one.


JWK

You have no sense or you would ask questions if you have no valid rebuttal.

No, Daniel, he's being nice and letting you know that you're posting nonsense.

 

[danielpalos]

Show us the express clause over the whole and entire concept of Immigration in our federal Constitution right-wingers; don't merely be immoral false witness bearers as is your customary and usual habit on the right-wing.

Now you want to go down your rabbit trail of immigration. Can you not find anything that relates to the discussion at hand?

Only hypocrites blame the less fortunate for their "illegality".

You become an illegal immigrant when you break the law coming into the nation. Is there any other way to look at it?

Not the same rules for refugees. Only right-wingers don't seem to care about distinctions in the law.

 

[danielpalos]

Show us the express clause over the whole and entire concept of Immigration in our federal Constitution right-wingers; don't merely be immoral false witness bearers as is your customary and usual habit on the right-wing.

Have you been drinking? Your post makes no sense whatsoever.

BTW, in case you missed it, the subject of the thread concerns the Equality Act.

JWK


The Equality Act attempts to exercise legislative power proposed under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, the Act is an attempted usurpation of power not granted.

You need to resort to the fewest fallacies to be worth equal for pay purposes.

No, actually, you do not. Where did you get that idea?

lol. Because sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation matters.

Which means nothing when it comes to work being worth a certain amount. A person does not determine a wage, his/her work does. And yes, Daniel, that means that women are your equals.

You have to resort to the fewest fallacies first, otherwise any woman is equal to You.

 

[danielpalos]

Equal protection of the at-will employment laws in our at-will employment States!

View attachment 500227

Yet another of Daniel's favorites that he will repeat endlessly. What he really means is that he should be able to collect Unemployment simply because he's not working, not because he got laid off.

The law is the law. Only illegals and right-wingers don't care about the law.