One More Similarity….

[PoliticalChic]

10. It appears that some disgusting low-life imagines (I almost said ‘thinks’) that harsh words by parents presents the opportunity for the Wehrmacht…..er, Democrats …..to unleash the FBI to harass those parents.

That’s because Democrats and their supporter do not honor America nor American heritage.



“…for free speech to be meaningful, the dominant culture must be committed to free speech – even speech it finds repellent, as long as it does not intentionally incite violence — and the government must truly be accountable to that dominant culture. Otherwise, our written First Amendment assurance of free speech is nearly as worthless as was the Soviet guarantee.

Put more concretely, the Justice Department may acknowledge, as Garland’s memo grudgingly does, that the Constitution protects debate and dissent. But if the DOJ simultaneously warns, as Garland’s memo indignantly does, that the FBI is going to be investigating those who engage in debate and dissent against the progressive government’s favored class — school administrators who are executing the indoctrination mission — then in what authentic sense do we have free speech?

…if the Justice Department were foolish enough to go to the extreme of actually indicting dissenters, it would expose the fatal flaws that a) the First Amendment prevents courts from allowing speech to be the subject of a criminal conviction and b) the federal government lacks statutory jurisdiction to bring an incitement case unless the resulting violent acts would violate federal law …” Do We Have Freedom of Speech, Really? | National Review



I direct anyone who questions that to research

Brandenburg v. Ohio |

 

[PoliticalChic]

11. In large measure, this board represents the free speech that is absent from political discourse under the Democrats.

Today the Democrats control every major cultural institution…media, government, education, economy, family, religion, arts and entertainment,….all the means of dissemination of information.
And….under their predecessors, the Bolsheviks. There, the people were reduced to samizdat…..



Real Americans are left with the same way of providing truth as Soviet hostages, their citizens, were:

“Samizdat
Samizdat (Russian: самизда́т, lit. "self-publishing") was a form of dissident activity across the Eastern Bloc in which individuals reproduced censored and underground makeshift publications, often by hand, and passed the documents from reader to reader.”
Samizdat - Wikipedia




“You may read our Constitution as a guarantee of free expression and open political debate. But it cannot be such a guarantee unless the government, which is privileged to use force to maintain order, regards order as necessarily including free expression and open political debate.
Government’s incumbent ruling class will always prize stability over conflict. Consequently, for free speech to be meaningful, the dominant culture must be committed to free speech – even speech it finds repellent, as long as it does not intentionally incite violence — and the government must truly be accountable to that dominant culture. Otherwise, our written First Amendment assurance of free speech is nearly as worthless as was the Soviet guarantee.”

Do We Have Freedom of Speech, Really? | National Review

Garland’s memo serves a progressive crusade to render these rights little more than a parchment promise.

www.nationalreview.com

To have free speech once again, America must jettison the Democrat Party.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"The Soviet constitution said that free speech was guaranteed “in order to strengthen the socialist system.” While it paid lip service to freedom, the tyrannical regime implicitly empowered itself to suppress any speech it decided could weaken the socialist system.

Today’s progressives say you have free speech . . . as long as it is not incitement. But then they redefine incitement to entail not just violence the speaker intends but violence to which hypersensitive progressives are “triggered,” even if violence was the last thing the speaker wanted. They reduce “free speech” to a protection only against criminal conviction, not against the intimidating law-enforcement process. And as they marginalize dissent, they excuse, even lionize, the mob.

Free speech is still inscribed in America’s Constitution. That does not mean it is still quintessentially American. We need it to be."

Do We Have Freedom of Speech, Really? | National Review

Garland’s memo serves a progressive crusade to render these rights little more than a parchment promise.

www.nationalreview.com

"The secret of tyranny — whether anarcho or the plain vanilla version with which the world is all too familiar — is that it never sprouts full-blown from anything. It always starts small and then gets bigger. So if you think these laws are good ideas, you shouldn't be too surprised at the arrival of an era when state power has grown so big that it starts knocking at your door — if, that is, it bothers to knock at all. "
Sam Francis Mentioned In The American Spectator | Blog Posts

 

[PoliticalChic]

6. The Soviet Constitution promised all the freedoms that our Constitution does…..but neither is honored.

The most recent example is the resistance to teaching out children that America is evil, they are oppressors, and that there is systemic racism. All are lies, the stock in trade of the Soviet Communists, and the current Democrat Party.

When parents confronted Marxist school boards, the regime had the Attn’y General turn the FBI and the DoJ on parent voicing disapproval…..using the free speech that the actual Constitution guarantees.

"AP Fact Check Falsely Claims School Board Group Did Not Classify Anti-CRT Parents ‘Domestic Terrorists’

After Attorney General Merrick Garland ordered the FBI to combat “threats of violence” against school administrators, the Associated Press falsely fact-checked a claim that the national school board group that prompted the policy wanted parents labeled “domestic terrorists.”

...the NSBA said that “these acts of malice, violence, and threats” should be classified as domestic terrorism:



As these acts of malice, violence, and threats against public school officials have increased, the classification of these heinous actions could be the equivalent to a form of domestic terrorism and hate crimes.


According to the Associated Press, conservatives on social media were lying when they claimed the NSBA specifically asked “the Biden administration to label parents who protest school policies domestic terrorists.”....

AP Fact Check

@APFactCheck
· Oct 6
Contrary to false claims circulating online, the National School Boards Association didn’t ask President Joe Biden to label protesting parents “domestic terrorists,” and there’s no indication Biden or the Justice Department called them terrorists, either. Posts mischaracterize school board organization’s letter to Biden

AP Defends School Boards Labeling Parents 'Domestic Terrorists'
The Associated Press falsely fact-checked a claim that the NSBA wanted parents labeled "domestic terrorists."
www.breitbart.com

Here is Hussein Obama agreeing with the claiming that concerned parents are simply using 'fake outrage' over what this Marxist school system is teaching their children:

‘The Five’ shreds ‘Captain Superior’ Obama for accusing concerned parents of ‘fake outrage’​

The Five (clip): AIR.TV

www.air.tv

 

[PoliticalChic]

6. The Soviet Constitution promised all the freedoms that our Constitution does…..but neither is honored.

The most recent example is the resistance to teaching out children that America is evil, they are oppressors, and that there is systemic racism. All are lies, the stock in trade of the Soviet Communists, and the current Democrat Party.

When parents confronted Marxist school boards, the regime had the Attn’y General turn the FBI and the DoJ on parent voicing disapproval…..using the free speech that the actual Constitution guarantees.

"AP Fact Check Falsely Claims School Board Group Did Not Classify Anti-CRT Parents ‘Domestic Terrorists’

After Attorney General Merrick Garland ordered the FBI to combat “threats of violence” against school administrators, the Associated Press falsely fact-checked a claim that the national school board group that prompted the policy wanted parents labeled “domestic terrorists.”

...the NSBA said that “these acts of malice, violence, and threats” should be classified as domestic terrorism:



As these acts of malice, violence, and threats against public school officials have increased, the classification of these heinous actions could be the equivalent to a form of domestic terrorism and hate crimes.


According to the Associated Press, conservatives on social media were lying when they claimed the NSBA specifically asked “the Biden administration to label parents who protest school policies domestic terrorists.”....

AP Fact Check

@APFactCheck
· Oct 6
Contrary to false claims circulating online, the National School Boards Association didn’t ask President Joe Biden to label protesting parents “domestic terrorists,” and there’s no indication Biden or the Justice Department called them terrorists, either. Posts mischaracterize school board organization’s letter to Biden

AP Defends School Boards Labeling Parents 'Domestic Terrorists'
The Associated Press falsely fact-checked a claim that the NSBA wanted parents labeled "domestic terrorists."
www.breitbart.com

 

[PoliticalChic]