Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No there is not.There is no law that forces companies with over 100 employees to mandate health or safety either?
Oh wait.... There is.
If it effects interstate commerce, then the Constitution specifically gives the federal government that power.No there is not.
Obamacare cannot mandate forced poisoning, human genetic research, or vaccination of employees.
You need to recognize the difference between health care and government intrusion.
States have to pass these kinds of laws. The feds are prohibited....because of the constitution.
You're ridiculous and your post is ludicrous.We are right in the middle of a revolution. Join the battle or move aside.
It is on.
The authoritarians are making their move to destrpy the nation, and nearly half of the voting public are brainwashed sheep in a cult.
They have no freedom of thought or speech. Only what their communist puppet masters tell them.
Laugh out loud. Grow up Col. and reenroll in the Second Grade, only then will you begin to grow up to adulthood.Commist Cuckold faggot translator:
YAWN = I am a brainwashed sheep with no thoughts of my own.
Nope.If it effects interstate commerce, then the Constitution specifically gives the federal government that power.
Control of interstate commerce is granted to congress in the constitution, and even expanded starting in Wickard V Filburn 317 U.S. 111 (1942),Nope.
Bullshit.
The Constitution spells out in detail the federal governments limitations in the Bill of Rights.
This power is exclusive to states....as spelled out in the 10th Amendment.
Democrats are attempting to go around the courts and create laws without going thru the process spelled out in the constitution. If they did go thru the process, the courts would strike them down as unconstitutional because they infringe on state's rights....and they know this.
Forcing people to get a shot has nothing to do with that, dipshit.....since it effects companies that provides goods and services....not just government. Whoever told you that mess was full of crap.Control of interstate commerce is granted to congress in the constitution, and even expanded starting in Wickard V Filburn 317 U.S. 111 (1942),
a United States Supreme Court decision that dramatically increased the regulatory power of the federal government.
Forcing people to get a shot has nothing to do with that, dipshit.....since it effects companies that provides goods and services....not just government. Whoever told you that mess was full of crap.
The mandate itself is what might effect interstate commerce thus....the Democrats are creating the issue or fabricating it out of thin-air.
They had to just watch the news to see examples of school board members being threatened.That letter was used by the Biden administration to justify Attorney General Merrick Garland’s creation of an FBI task force supposedly designed to address violent threats made against school officials.”
You cannot create or intentionally cause a disruption legally. That is called a criminal act or a criminal conspiracy to commit mayhem.If the mandate might effect interstate commerce, and congress has the power to regulate what might be interstate commerce. When they created a regulatory agency, that agency is operating under congressional oversight, and under congresses constitutional authorization.
true…between the Soviet Establishment, and their spawn, the Democrat Party: having a meaningless Constitution.
1. “The Soviet constitution of 1936, Joseph Stalin’s constitution, explicitly guaranteed freedom of speech to all citizens of the USSR — in Article 125, which also vouchsafed the closely related freedoms of the press, of assembly, of mass meetings, and of street demonstrations. When Moscow revised the constitution in 1977, pains were again taken (in Article 50) to ensure — at least on paper — that “citizens of the U.S.S.R. are guaranteed freedom of speech, of the press, and of assembly, meetings, street processions and demonstrations.”
2. Were they in a position to do so, the tens of millions of men, women, and children immiserated, imprisoned, enslaved, and killed by the same totalitarian communist regime would have begged to differ.
3. “Rights” are not rights by virtue of being written down. They are not self-enforcing. Written “rights” are, instead, a reflection of what a body politic perceives to be fundamental. They are not an assurance that this perception will be actualized. Whether freedom of speech truly exists is a cultural question, not a legal one. It hinges on the society’s commitment to liberty as something that is lived, not merely spoken of.
4. To rely on the legal system to enforce a “right” that the culture, when it gets down to brass tacks, does not support, is to not have a vibrant guarantee. It is to have a parchment promise that is effectively worthless.
Increasingly, the latter is the state of play in the United State…”
If you're a republican you can.You cannot create or intentionally cause a disruption legally. That is called a criminal act or a criminal conspiracy to commit mayhem.
As a short-term political objective, the Garland memo cynically paints these recalcitrant parents with the same brush that tars conservatives as “domestic terrorists,” on the rationale that Trump supporters who rioted at the Capitol self-identify as the patriotic political right and profess to share some conservative ideas.
