One Month Left

The next 49 days are gonna be like tied to a chair in a room with a chimpanzee with a loaded pistol.
 
It looks bad when you consider the cost of the kids, but refuse to consider the benefits of those same kids. You’re cooking the books.

Do you have some studies of the benefits these kids provide when they become adults or are you just speculating that they will be productive citizens?

Did rejecting the deal result in legislation to stop it? Because if it didn’t, your logic fails to work.

Obviously not, but it also didn’t sign into law allowing illegals to come into the country, setting a very bad precedent.

I keep asking the same question and you keep juking and jiving. Why would Democrats want any number of ILLEGALS to cross the border? If we can stop it, which the ill implies we can do, why not stop it? To a thinking person, that sure seems as though somebody wants people to enter this country illegally.

I just don’t see the point in going after them and deporting them.

It doesn’t help anyone. It just hurt them and us.

Make them pay a fine.

Maybe some of them can pay the fine with the debit cards they get from NYC. Talk about robbing Peter to pay Paul.
 
Do you have some studies of the benefits these kids provide when they become adults or are you just speculating that they will be productive citizens?

Yes, but it's also just common sense. It'd be pretty absurd to think that no children of illegal immigrants get jobs and contribute to society.


Obviously not, but it also didn’t sign into law allowing illegals to come into the country, setting a very bad precedent.

I keep asking the same question and you keep juking and jiving. Why would Democrats want any number of ILLEGALS to cross the border? If we can stop it, which the ill implies we can do, why not stop it? To a thinking person, that sure seems as though somebody wants people to enter this country illegally.

Since there is no limit, the bill represents an improvement on the situation over the status quo. But you rejected an improvement in the status quo because it wasn't everything you wanted because you're a spoiled child.

Maybe some of them can pay the fine with the debit cards they get from NYC. Talk about robbing Peter to pay Paul.

Again, different populations. There are millions of illegal immigrants who are in the country for years. We aren't talking about recent arrivals who have yet to establish themselves in the community.
 
Yes, but it's also just common sense. It'd be pretty absurd to think that no children of illegal immigrants get jobs and contribute to society.

I never said that “no” children of illegal immigrants get jobs and contribute. By the way, Trump isn’t talking about deporting these people anyway. They are citizens if they were born here, even if their parents are illegal. I don’t agree with that either, but that is the law of the land, albeit antiquated.

Illegal immigrants should be deported because they didn’t follow the proper channels to get into this country. They broke the law. It is a simple as that. If you want an open border with no checks so that everybody is essentially legal, then call your Congressman and get the all rolling with that.

Since there is no limit, the bill represents an improvement on the situation over the status quo. But you rejected an improvement in the status quo because it wasn't everything you wanted because you're a spoiled child.

I will try this one more time. Why would the bill be written to allow x number of illegals in before stopping the flow? It sure seems like the compromise was to appease those that want people to come into this country illegally. Who would that be?

Again, different populations. There are millions of illegal immigrants who are in the country for years. We aren't talking about recent arrivals who have yet to establish themselves in the community.

So what? If you committed a crime, the fact that you may have a job doesn’t preclude you from paying a penalty for that crime. Crossing the US border illegally is a crime. I don’t understand what you don’t understand about that.
 
Yeah, but it's not like you dem shills had much leadership to start with.

Speaking of which who's your paradigm of hopeium in the dem party now?
They had a leader or two:


iu

iu

iu


Hopefully, common sense will find its way back into the White House and the above loony-tunes find their way back into their obscure, "diverse" fantasy worlds.
 
I never said that “no” children of illegal immigrants get jobs and contribute. By the way, Trump isn’t talking about deporting these people anyway. They are citizens if they were born here, even if their parents are illegal. I don’t agree with that either, but that is the law of the land, albeit antiquated.

Illegal immigrants should be deported because they didn’t follow the proper channels to get into this country. They broke the law. It is a simple as that. If you want an open border with no checks so that everybody is essentially legal, then call your Congressman and get the all rolling with that.
Since there is "no" accounting for their contribution as adults, then you're implicitly assuming that "no" children get jobs and contribute.

They sure as hell are talking about deporting them together, not to mention that Trump has called to end birthright citizenship and with control of the courts in the hands of his right wing judges, we have no idea what the "law of the land" means anymore.



I will try this one more time. Why would the bill be written to allow x number of illegals in before stopping the flow? It sure seems like the compromise was to appease those that want people to come into this country illegally. Who would that be?

Your question is both irrelevant and based on misinformation.


Anyone entering the country and caught by ICE still has to go through a process of applying for asylum which the bill made harder to get.

So you oppose the bill without even understanding what it does, this is typical for low information voters like yourself.

So what? If you committed a crime, the fact that you may have a job doesn’t preclude you from paying a penalty for that crime. Crossing the US border illegally is a crime. I don’t understand what you don’t understand about that.

Sure, pay a fine. Sounds reasonable. At this point, deporting them all hurts everyone.
 
Since there is "no" accounting for their contribution as adults, then you're implicitly assuming that "no" children get jobs and contribute.

They sure as hell are talking about deporting them together, not to mention that Trump has called to end birthright citizenship and with control of the courts in the hands of his right wing judges, we have no idea what the "law of the land" means anymore.





Your question is both irrelevant and based on misinformation.


Anyone entering the country and caught by ICE still has to go through a process of applying for asylum which the bill made harder to get.

So you oppose the bill without even understanding what it does, this is typical for low information voters like yourself.



Sure, pay a fine. Sounds reasonable. At this point, deporting them all hurts everyone.

I am done discussing this with you. You have an excuse for every obviously dumb thing the Democrats support and do. You are fully brainwashed. There is no hope in changing your mind. There is absolutely no evidence or logic that could be presented that would allow you to veer from your leftiest ideology. I’m just hopeful that you are a dying breed. If we can remove this type of indoctrination from our schools, we can at least have more successful future generations.
 
I am done discussing this with you. You have an excuse for every obviously dumb thing the Democrats support and do. You are fully brainwashed. There is no hope in changing your mind. There is absolutely no evidence or logic that could be presented that would allow you to veer from your leftiest ideology. I’m just hopeful that you are a dying breed. If we can remove this type of indoctrination from our schools, we can at least have more successful future generations.
Anything that runs counter to your narrative, you ignore. This is your indoctrination. Not mine.

And here you’re making an excuse to ignore me, by pretending I’m not responding to evidence or logic when you’ve provided none.
 
What seats did they lose? Do tell. This should be rich. Pretty sure they came out even.
They lost a net of 1-2 seats. Depends on the results of the last race in California.

They win 222 seats in 2022. They will have won 220 or 221 in 2024.
 
15th post
LOL

What does “depends”?
Uh, because the race in California hasn’t been called.

If Dems win the race, then Republicans lose a net or 2 seats. If Dems lose the race, then Republicans lose a net or 1 seat.

Jesus, I feel like I’m speaking to a child. Why do I have to explain this to you?
 
Uh, because the race in California hasn’t been called.

If Dems win the race, then Republicans lose a net or 2 seats. If Dems lose the race, then Republicans lose a net or 1 seat.

Jesus, I feel like I’m speaking to a child. Why do I have to explain this to you?
Cheating again. Seriously, still counting nearly 1 month after election day. Ridiculous.
 
Uh, because the race in California hasn’t been called.

If Dems win the race, then Republicans lose a net or 2 seats. If Dems lose the race, then Republicans lose a net or 1 seat.

Jesus, I feel like I’m speaking to a child. Why do I have to explain this to you?
So one seat and you’re celebrating. Hahahahahahahahahaha

This is truly priceless.

IMG_3261.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom