Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Excuses are for losers.You seem upset? TDS working overtime tonight?
Trump 47
![]()
Trump 47Excuses are for losers.
That’s all you have. That’s all you are.
Your party lost seats in the House and you called it a landslide.Trump 47
Your party is in shambles
Your party lost seats in the House and you called it a landslide.
Losers with excuses.
If it was a landslide, why did you barely win the house? Republicans have only a few vote margin.Republicans control the House, and the Senate, and POTUS...and SCOTUS
It looks bad when you consider the cost of the kids, but refuse to consider the benefits of those same kids. You’re cooking the books.
Did rejecting the deal result in legislation to stop it? Because if it didn’t, your logic fails to work.
I just don’t see the point in going after them and deporting them.
It doesn’t help anyone. It just hurt them and us.
Make them pay a fine.
Do you have some studies of the benefits these kids provide when they become adults or are you just speculating that they will be productive citizens?
Obviously not, but it also didn’t sign into law allowing illegals to come into the country, setting a very bad precedent.
I keep asking the same question and you keep juking and jiving. Why would Democrats want any number of ILLEGALS to cross the border? If we can stop it, which the ill implies we can do, why not stop it? To a thinking person, that sure seems as though somebody wants people to enter this country illegally.
Maybe some of them can pay the fine with the debit cards they get from NYC. Talk about robbing Peter to pay Paul.
Yes, but it's also just common sense. It'd be pretty absurd to think that no children of illegal immigrants get jobs and contribute to society.
Since there is no limit, the bill represents an improvement on the situation over the status quo. But you rejected an improvement in the status quo because it wasn't everything you wanted because you're a spoiled child.
Again, different populations. There are millions of illegal immigrants who are in the country for years. We aren't talking about recent arrivals who have yet to establish themselves in the community.
They had a leader or two:Yeah, but it's not like you dem shills had much leadership to start with.
Speaking of which who's your paradigm of hopeium in the dem party now?
Since there is "no" accounting for their contribution as adults, then you're implicitly assuming that "no" children get jobs and contribute.I never said that “no” children of illegal immigrants get jobs and contribute. By the way, Trump isn’t talking about deporting these people anyway. They are citizens if they were born here, even if their parents are illegal. I don’t agree with that either, but that is the law of the land, albeit antiquated.
Illegal immigrants should be deported because they didn’t follow the proper channels to get into this country. They broke the law. It is a simple as that. If you want an open border with no checks so that everybody is essentially legal, then call your Congressman and get the all rolling with that.
I will try this one more time. Why would the bill be written to allow x number of illegals in before stopping the flow? It sure seems like the compromise was to appease those that want people to come into this country illegally. Who would that be?
So what? If you committed a crime, the fact that you may have a job doesn’t preclude you from paying a penalty for that crime. Crossing the US border illegally is a crime. I don’t understand what you don’t understand about that.
Since there is "no" accounting for their contribution as adults, then you're implicitly assuming that "no" children get jobs and contribute.
They sure as hell are talking about deporting them together, not to mention that Trump has called to end birthright citizenship and with control of the courts in the hands of his right wing judges, we have no idea what the "law of the land" means anymore.
![]()
'Litigation is a certainty': Trump's call to end birthright citizenship would face a mountain of opposition
An executive order would kick-start a legal fight that could lead to a Supreme Court ruling.www.nbcnews.com
Your question is both irrelevant and based on misinformation.
![]()
No, Border Deal Won’t ‘Allow’ 5,000 Unauthorized Immigrants a Day
Republican critics are misrepresenting one provision of a bipartisan deal to suggest that it permits 5,000 illegal crossings a day.www.nytimes.com
Anyone entering the country and caught by ICE still has to go through a process of applying for asylum which the bill made harder to get.
So you oppose the bill without even understanding what it does, this is typical for low information voters like yourself.
Sure, pay a fine. Sounds reasonable. At this point, deporting them all hurts everyone.
Anything that runs counter to your narrative, you ignore. This is your indoctrination. Not mine.I am done discussing this with you. You have an excuse for every obviously dumb thing the Democrats support and do. You are fully brainwashed. There is no hope in changing your mind. There is absolutely no evidence or logic that could be presented that would allow you to veer from your leftiest ideology. I’m just hopeful that you are a dying breed. If we can remove this type of indoctrination from our schools, we can at least have more successful future generations.
What seats did they lose? Do tell. This should be rich. Pretty sure they came out even.Your party lost seats in the House and you called it a landslide.
Losers with excuses.
They lost a net of 1-2 seats. Depends on the results of the last race in California.What seats did they lose? Do tell. This should be rich. Pretty sure they came out even.
LOLThey lost a net of 1-2 seats. Depends on the results of the last race in California.
They win 222 seats in 2022. They will have won 220 or 221 in 2024.
Uh, because the race in California hasn’t been called.LOL
What does “depends”?
Cheating again. Seriously, still counting nearly 1 month after election day. Ridiculous.Uh, because the race in California hasn’t been called.
If Dems win the race, then Republicans lose a net or 2 seats. If Dems lose the race, then Republicans lose a net or 1 seat.
Jesus, I feel like I’m speaking to a child. Why do I have to explain this to you?
You mean the neocon **** Haley? No thanks.MAGA is largely composed of children who voted for a child. A spoiled child.
You could have voted for an adult but it didn’t give you the same feeling as voting for Trump
So one seat and you’re celebrating. HahahahahahahahahahaUh, because the race in California hasn’t been called.
If Dems win the race, then Republicans lose a net or 2 seats. If Dems lose the race, then Republicans lose a net or 1 seat.
Jesus, I feel like I’m speaking to a child. Why do I have to explain this to you?