One day America will adopt a life ethic, and all pro-abort leaders will be shamed

[P@triot]

Methinks you've got bunk and are deflecting.

Well if that were true you would have absolutely no problem promising to admit you are extremely ignorant of current events and that you're a liar if I'm able to produce the links. But yet you're unwilling to do that. Why?

(Because you've seen them before when I've posted them)

It's interesting you're not more enamoured with Trump...because you're very much like him.

Since I don't read every post you make, you cannot be guaranteed that I've seen these links you've yet to produce. I'm certainly not going to go search every stupid thing you've said for these links you still have not been able to produce. I believe you're deflecting because you can't produce what you claim. You're still deflecting.

I'm just going to assume, since you can't produce these links, that they don't exist and you're lying. You could prove me wrong anytime, but you're not so I we'll just say you were lying and be done with it. Ciao!

I can produce them. Which is exactly why you refuse to agree to admit you are ignorant and a liar if I post them.

 

[Seawytch]

Methinks you've got bunk and are deflecting.

Well if that were true you would have absolutely no problem promising to admit you are extremely ignorant of current events and that you're a liar if I'm able to produce the links. But yet you're unwilling to do that. Why?

(Because you've seen them before when I've posted them)

It's interesting you're not more enamoured with Trump...because you're very much like him.

Since I don't read every post you make, you cannot be guaranteed that I've seen these links you've yet to produce. I'm certainly not going to go search every stupid thing you've said for these links you still have not been able to produce. I believe you're deflecting because you can't produce what you claim. You're still deflecting.

I'm just going to assume, since you can't produce these links, that they don't exist and you're lying. You could prove me wrong anytime, but you're not so I we'll just say you were lying and be done with it. Ciao!

I can produce them. Which is exactly why you refuse to agree to admit you are ignorant and a liar if I post them.

A dancing emoticon is quite apropos for you. You keep dancing around producing links. Still can't come up with those credible links I see...

Even if you do produce these links you keep claiming you have, how does that make me a liar? I simply said produce them or you are a liar. Your failure to produce these links is just proving me right. Why don't you want to prove me wrong? I'd think you'd be jumping at the chance...and yet you just keep dancing.

 

[P@triot]

Methinks you've got bunk and are deflecting.

Well if that were true you would have absolutely no problem promising to admit you are extremely ignorant of current events and that you're a liar if I'm able to produce the links. But yet you're unwilling to do that. Why?

(Because you've seen them before when I've posted them)

It's interesting you're not more enamoured with Trump...because you're very much like him.

Since I don't read every post you make, you cannot be guaranteed that I've seen these links you've yet to produce. I'm certainly not going to go search every stupid thing you've said for these links you still have not been able to produce. I believe you're deflecting because you can't produce what you claim. You're still deflecting.

I'm just going to assume, since you can't produce these links, that they don't exist and you're lying. You could prove me wrong anytime, but you're not so I we'll just say you were lying and be done with it. Ciao!

I can produce them. Which is exactly why you refuse to agree to admit you are ignorant and a liar if I post them.

A dancing emoticon is quite apropos for you. You keep dancing around producing links. Still can't come up with those credible links I see...

Even if you do produce these links you keep claiming you have, how does that make me a liar? I simply said produce them or you are a liar. Your failure to produce these links is just proving me right. Why don't you want to prove me wrong? I'd think you'd be jumping at the chance...and yet you just keep dancing.

Because I want you to agree to admit that you're ignorant and a liar. What are you so afraid of wytch? According to you I can't produce the links. If you really believed that you would have agreed several days ago. It's proof that you know and you lied. Which is what you normally do.

 

[Seawytch]

Methinks you've got bunk and are deflecting.

Well if that were true you would have absolutely no problem promising to admit you are extremely ignorant of current events and that you're a liar if I'm able to produce the links. But yet you're unwilling to do that. Why?

(Because you've seen them before when I've posted them)

It's interesting you're not more enamoured with Trump...because you're very much like him.

Since I don't read every post you make, you cannot be guaranteed that I've seen these links you've yet to produce. I'm certainly not going to go search every stupid thing you've said for these links you still have not been able to produce. I believe you're deflecting because you can't produce what you claim. You're still deflecting.

I'm just going to assume, since you can't produce these links, that they don't exist and you're lying. You could prove me wrong anytime, but you're not so I we'll just say you were lying and be done with it. Ciao!

I can produce them. Which is exactly why you refuse to agree to admit you are ignorant and a liar if I post them.

A dancing emoticon is quite apropos for you. You keep dancing around producing links. Still can't come up with those credible links I see...

Even if you do produce these links you keep claiming you have, how does that make me a liar? I simply said produce them or you are a liar. Your failure to produce these links is just proving me right. Why don't you want to prove me wrong? I'd think you'd be jumping at the chance...and yet you just keep dancing.

Because I want you to agree to admit that you're ignorant and a liar. What are you so afraid of wytch? According to you I can't produce the links. If you really believed that you would have agreed several days ago. It's proof that you know and you lied. Which is what you normally do.

What would I be lying about, Puppy? Here is what I said:

"provide the links or you are lying"

Why are you hitting yourself? If you produce these credible links, you're not lying. Until you do, you are. It's simple like you.

 

[P@triot]

What would I be lying about, Puppy? Here is what I said: "provide the links or you are lying". Why are you hitting yourself? If you produce these credible links, you're not lying. Until you do, you are. It's simple like you.

For starters - you claimed what I said wasn't true (when it is). For another, you claim that I've never posted it before (which I have).

In either case - why would it matter? According to you - it doesn't exist. So you'd never have to admit to anything anyway, right? What are you so afraid of?

 

[Seawytch]

What would I be lying about, Puppy? Here is what I said: "provide the links or you are lying". Why are you hitting yourself? If you produce these credible links, you're not lying. Until you do, you are. It's simple like you.

For starters - you claimed what I said wasn't true (when it is). For another, you claim that I've never posted it before (which I have).

In either case - why would it matter? According to you - it doesn't exist. So you'd never have to admit to anything anyway, right? What are you so afraid of?

Keep dancing, Fred, around your inability to provide links to back up your assertions. There is only one logical conclusion...they don't exist. No links, guess you're full of shit...but we knew that already.

 

[owebo]

What would I be lying about, Puppy? Here is what I said: "provide the links or you are lying". Why are you hitting yourself? If you produce these credible links, you're not lying. Until you do, you are. It's simple like you.

For starters - you claimed what I said wasn't true (when it is). For another, you claim that I've never posted it before (which I have).

In either case - why would it matter? According to you - it doesn't exist. So you'd never have to admit to anything anyway, right? What are you so afraid of?

Keep dancing, Fred, around your inability to provide links to back up your assertions. There is only one logical conclusion...they don't exist. No links, guess you're full of shit...but we knew that already.

 

[P@triot]

Keep dancing, Fred, around your inability to provide links to back up your assertions. There is only one logical conclusion...they don't exist. No links, guess you're full of shit...but we knew that already.

So then what do you have to lose by agreeing to admit you're profoundly ignorant of current events and a liar? If they don't exist and I can't produce them - then you're in the clear.

Backed into a corner now are we wytchy?!?

 

[Seawytch]

Keep dancing, Fred, around your inability to provide links to back up your assertions. There is only one logical conclusion...they don't exist. No links, guess you're full of shit...but we knew that already.

So then what do you have to lose by agreeing to admit you're profoundly ignorant of current events and a liar? If they don't exist and I can't produce them - then you're in the clear.

Backed into a corner now are we wytchy?!?

Poor Puppy...failed again. Can't produce. I'm not even a little surprised that you made a claim you can't support. It's kind of your MO and another reason you're so Trump-like.

 

[P@triot]

Keep dancing, Fred, around your inability to provide links to back up your assertions. There is only one logical conclusion...they don't exist. No links, guess you're full of shit...but we knew that already.

So then what do you have to lose by agreeing to admit you're profoundly ignorant of current events and a liar? If they don't exist and I can't produce them - then you're in the clear.

Backed into a corner now are we wytchy?!?

Poor Puppy...failed again. Can't produce. I'm not even a little surprised that you made a claim you can't support. It's kind of your MO and another reason you're so Trump-like.

Backed into a corner now are we wytchy?!?

(Psst...we all know that you know I have it based on your fear)

 

[P@triot]

Run wytchy ruuuuuun

 

[Windship]

When Im on the trail I carry. People look at me weird and ask with an attitude "why do you carry a gun"? I say "to protect life and to make myself equal to everything around me". They dont know what to say...what IS there to say to that. Why wouldnt want to protect life? Why wouldnt you want to be equal?

I think they just can't believe what a dumbass you are. But feel free to interpret it as admiration if you want.

What an unbelievable moron. Im not looking for admiration. You completely missed it didnt you? Lol. Wtf are you talking about? Lol, wow.

 

[Seawytch]

Run wytchy ruuuuuun

View attachment 93404

Everyone can see it's you that's running from the claims you made. I haven't made a single claim that I need to run from. The only thing I said was "provide the links or you are lying". You could easily prove me wrong and then you'd be able to dance happily that you were not lying.

It's simple... and your Trump-like deflections won't save you, post the links to support your claims. Your continued inability to do so tells the story.

 

[P@triot]

Holy shit. P@triot might be the dumbest poster here. Wow.

Holy shit...GaryDog just became the actual dumbest poster here. No "might" about it.

Yes, the Sally Hemmings stories are real.

He was exonerated by DNA you dill hole. How uninformed are you?!?

Yes, Thomas Jefferson essentially raped a woman who was his property.

Even if he had sex with her (and he didn't) you would literally have no way to know if it was consensual or not. So you're not only a dumb-ass, you're also a liar.

But I see you're defending it on the grounds that his wife was dead.

No....uh...your dumb-ass said that Jefferson had an affair. His wife was dead long before progressives assholes like you started the rumor which modern science has already debunked.

You disqualify Herman Cain because he never held office? Dumbass, you're the one who dared me to list GOP CANDIDATES (and presidents) who were morally bankrupt.

No dumb-ass....never said "candidates". You really are a very special kind of stupid. We were talking about holding office. Clearly you limited intellect prevent you from following along.

I think I gave you like 10. You were wrong in your defense of one, and didn't bother to defend the other 9 or so. LOL

Well cupcake - I've already nailed you on two (Jefferson who never engaged in the behavior and Cain who never held office). Apparently subtracting 2 from 10 is more than you can handle.

 

[GaryDog]

Holy shit. P@triot might be the dumbest poster here. Wow.

Holy shit...GaryDog just became the actual dumbest poster here. No "might" about it.

Yes, the Sally Hemmings stories are real.

He was exonerated by DNA you dill hole. How uninformed are you?!?

Yes, Thomas Jefferson essentially raped a woman who was his property.

Even if he had sex with her (and he didn't) you would literally have no way to know if it was consensual or not. So you're not only a dumb-ass, you're also a liar.

But I see you're defending it on the grounds that his wife was dead.

No....uh...your dumb-ass said that Jefferson had an affair. His wife was dead long before progressives assholes like you started the rumor which modern science has already debunked.

You disqualify Herman Cain because he never held office? Dumbass, you're the one who dared me to list GOP CANDIDATES (and presidents) who were morally bankrupt.

No dumb-ass....never said "candidates". You really are a very special kind of stupid. We were talking about holding office. Clearly you limited intellect prevent you from following along.

I think I gave you like 10. You were wrong in your defense of one, and didn't bother to defend the other 9 or so. LOL

Well cupcake - I've already nailed you on two (Jefferson who never engaged in the behavior and Cain who never held office). Apparently subtracting 2 from 10 is more than you can handle.

You went back and edited your post to remove the request for me to name GOP office-holders and candidates. You're a ******* coward c*nt. Regardless, you're nailed by virtually everyone here, and just you knowing about your cowardice and stupidity is enough for me.

 

[P@triot]

I haven't made a single claim that I need to run from.

You made two sweetie. That it wasn't true and that I couldn't provide links to a credible source. I can do both and will the moment you promise to admit that you are astoundingly ignorant of current events and that you're a liar after I post the links.

If I can't do it (as you claim) - what are you so afraid of?!?

 

[P@triot]

You went back and edited your post to remove the request for me to name GOP office-holders and candidates. You're a ******* coward c*nt.

Um....I can't do that stupid. Bwahahahahaha!!! You just got owned, *****



(Making GaryDog my personal ***** since 02-10-16)

 

[Seawytch]

I haven't made a single claim that I need to run from.

You made two sweetie. That it wasn't true and that I couldn't provide links to a credible source. I can do both and will the moment you promise to admit that you are astoundingly ignorant of current events and that you're a liar after I post the links.

If I can't do it (as you claim) - what are you so afraid of?!?

Post the claims I made. While you're at it you can post the links you say you have but haven't produced. You talk big but when it comes time to perform...not even viagra can save you. Poor limp Puppy.

 

[P@triot]

Bwaaahahahaha!!! Where should I start? I can't tell if you're being sarcastic with Thomas Jefferson. Ever heard of Sally Hemmings? Doubt it. It was his slave that he knocked up.

“President Thomas Jefferson was accused of having fathered a child, Tom, by Sally Hemings. Tom was said to have been born in 1790, soon after Jefferson and Sally Hemings returned from France, where he had been minister. Present-day members of the African-American Woodson family believe that Thomas Jefferson was the father of Thomas Woodson, whose name comes from his later owner. . . . [But DNA testing shows] Thomas Woodson was not Thomas Jefferson’s son”

“So, the longest rumored charge against Jefferson, originally printed two centuries ago in publications of the day, was now proven wrong. Jefferson had been completely exonerated of that longstanding claim. Additionally, when Nature issued its embarrassing retraction, it sheepishly confessed, “The title assigned to our study was misleading.”

Excerpt From: Barton, David. “The Jefferson Lies.” Wallbuilders, 2012-09-17. iBooks.
This material may be protected by copyright.

Check out this book on the iBooks Store: The Jefferson Lies

(Making GaryDog my personal ***** since 02-10-16)

 

[GaryDog]

You went back and edited your post to remove the request for me to name GOP office-holders and candidates. You're a ******* coward c*nt.

Um....I can't do that stupid. Bwahahahahaha!!! You just got owned, *****



(Making GaryDog my personal ***** since 02-10-16)

You can't edit??? Since when? I've been able to edit any of my posts after they were posted. Stop lying.