Once Upon a Time, it Was Okay To Demand Electors Flip

[excalibur]

All the way back in 2016 in fact.

Democrats, Hollywood types, celebrities, all sorts wanted to screw around with electors. And no one considered any of this being worthy of felony charges.

Sacred electors? Nah, just another example of the double standards the left imposes on us.

 

[Skylar]

All the way back in 2016 in fact.

Democrats, Hollywood types, celebrities, all sorts wanted to screw around with electors. And no one considered any of this being worthy of felony charges.

Sacred electors? Nah, just another example of the double standards the left imposes on us.

You might want to read the indictment against the 16 in Michigan. It has nothing to do with faithless electors.

 

[excalibur]

​

Democrats have objected to certifying Electoral College wins for the presidential contests of 2000, 2004, and 2016. ​

​

In 2004, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) joined Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-Ohio) in objecting to President Bush’s electoral win in Ohio, noting issues and discrepancies with voting machines, among other irregularities. “...we have the legitimacy of our elections challenged, rightly or wrongly, by people who are not certain as to whether our processes are fair and just,” Senator Obama said. ​

​

“As we look at our election system, I think it's fair to say that there are many legitimate questions about its accuracy, about its integrity, and they're not confined to the state of Ohio,” Senator Clinton said. Remember that ​

​

Democrats objected to the last three presidential contests won by Republicans as the Justice System is weaponized against Donald Trump and his supporters.​

​

 

[Skylar]

​

Democrats have objected to certifying Electoral College wins for the presidential contests of 2000, 2004, and 2016. ​

​

In 2004, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) joined Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-Ohio) in objecting to President Bush’s electoral win in Ohio, noting issues and discrepancies with voting machines, among other irregularities. “...we have the legitimacy of our elections challenged, rightly or wrongly, by people who are not certain as to whether our processes are fair and just,” Senator Obama said. ​

​

“As we look at our election system, I think it's fair to say that there are many legitimate questions about its accuracy, about its integrity, and they're not confined to the state of Ohio,” Senator Clinton said. Remember that ​

​

Democrats objected to the last three presidential contests won by Republicans as the Justice System is weaponized against Donald Trump and his supporters.​

Uh-huh. And what do faithless electors have to do with the charges of forgery and conspiracy that the 16 in Michigan are faced with.

Smiling.....you never read the indictment, did you?

So much for your 'double standard'. Y'all always have to be the victims.

 

[Oddball]

"Faithless electors" I believe they're called.

 

[okfine]

All the way back in 2016 in fact.

Democrats, Hollywood types, celebrities, all sorts wanted to screw around with electors. And no one considered any of this being worthy of felony charges.

Sacred electors? Nah, just another example of the double standards the left imposes on us.

Did they sign their names knowing they were fake themselves?

 

[WinterBorn]

The electoral votes have always been open to have the electors change who they cast their vote for.

But I do not recall people claiming to be electors when they are not.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Sure, you morons, real electors, not fake electors.

 

[d0gbreath]

Every system has loop holes. Faithless electors found one.

 

[Skylar]

"Faithless electors" I believe they're called.

And what do faithless electors have to do with the 16 in Michigan indicted for felonies on conspiracy and forgery?