Once and for all... why you shouldn't believe the MSM and I want you BIASED MSM defenders --- defend!

peach174

Gold Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2010
Messages
26,435
Reaction score
6,973
Points
290
Location
S.E. AZ
It's a simple question based on these facts and I'd like some of you ignorant, uninformed people explain why its is wrong. Here are the facts with links, substantiation...NOT MY subjective opinion...but simple facts.
A) Trump received 95% negative press.
"Former Democratic president Carter comes to President Trump's defense following onslaught of negative coverage."
Broadcast coverage of Trump 95% negative, according to new study
“I’ve been studying the news media and elections for more than 35 years. Trust me — there’s never been anything like it,” said Rich Noyes, research director for the conservative press watchdog.

B) Proof of WHY MSM biased?
90% donations went to Biden by MSM in 2020. In 2016 96% donations to Hillary.
These are facts... that have directly affected the BIASED MSM reporting.
View attachment 443682
95% negative press?

Perhaps he shouldn't have been a 100% asshole...fired people by tweet...called people 3rd grade names....referred to women as dogs....banned people from coming here based on their religion....plopped kids into cages as a "deterrent" (500+ still remain by the way--not one committed a single fucking crime)....argued that the kids he kidnapped aren't entitled to soap and toothpaste...called the neo-nazi's "very fine people...called Mexicans "rapists"...said Russia didn't interfere in our 2016 election....gladhaned a brutal North Korean dictator...lied tens of thousands of times....totally ignored a pandemic as it raged the countryside for weeks at a time.
All of those things you listed is media driven
division.
LOL...

All of what I posted actually happened.
All misrepresented by main stream media.
He called one woman a dog not all women are dogs .
He banned travel from Muslim countries because of their wars not because of their religion.
See how media has twisted that?
All of it twisted into negative hate.
Should the President be calling any woman a "dog"?
He banned Muslims from coming here because of "their wars"? What wars are those?

It wasn't twisted into hate...your blob was and is a hateful sack of shit. Sorry. But it's true.
It's too bad you can't see the whole picture of this mess we are in.
The media and both parties of the corrupt establishment has just been voted back in.
 

Slade3200

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
38,759
Reaction score
5,991
Points
1,140
I have always been the type of person to consider the source, myself.

What do they want us to believe ?What words are they using towards that end? Are they appealing to our emotions or our intellect? What are they NOT telling us? How are they framing their coverage? Who benefits if people follow them without questioning?

I don't know if you can actually teach critical thinking skills as much of it is innate, but I think it is possible to at least encourage it. Our school system actually squashes it rather than encouraging it, though, as children are taught to not ask questions but simply accept answers. Compliance is valued over inquiry, and so we have become a nation where fewer and fewer people even ask the question "is this true?"

As the Media becomes more and more an extension of the global elites and sees itself more and more as a tool to shape a compliant society eager to serve this elite, our lack of critical thinking skills is leading us towards dystopia.
What have you seen in our school system to make that statement. I ask because I recently started coaching for my old high school and have been extremely impressed with the intellect and maturity of some of the kids. Some are immature little shits but then again, it is high school. I haven’t noticed the lack of questioning, curiosity and inquisition that you mentioned so I’m curious where you’ve seen it
 

HappyJoy

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
27,331
Reaction score
3,676
Points
290
p
It's a simple question based on these facts and I'd like some of you ignorant, uninformed people explain why its is wrong. Here are the facts with links, substantiation...NOT MY subjective opinion...but simple facts.
A) Trump received 95% negative press.
"Former Democratic president Carter comes to President Trump's defense following onslaught of negative coverage."
Broadcast coverage of Trump 95% negative, according to new study
“I’ve been studying the news media and elections for more than 35 years. Trust me — there’s never been anything like it,” said Rich Noyes, research director for the conservative press watchdog.

B) Proof of WHY MSM biased?
90% donations went to Biden by MSM in 2020. In 2016 96% donations to Hillary.
These are facts... that have directly affected the BIASED MSM reporting.
View attachment 443682
95% negative press?

Perhaps he shouldn't have been a 100% asshole...fired people by tweet...called people 3rd grade names....referred to women as dogs....banned people from coming here based on their religion....plopped kids into cages as a "deterrent" (500+ still remain by the way--not one committed a single fucking crime)....argued that the kids he kidnapped aren't entitled to soap and toothpaste...called the neo-nazi's "very fine people...called Mexicans "rapists"...said Russia didn't interfere in our 2016 election....gladhaned a brutal North Korean dictator...lied tens of thousands of times....totally ignored a pandemic as it raged the countryside for weeks at a time.
Plopped kids in OBAMA'S CAGES. The rest of that BS is out of context as well like everything else that the MSM spewed for the last four years. They also told us he recommended shooting up bleach--NEVER HAPPENED.
The fact that you guys still continue to tell lies (but you probably don't know it) about what the original purpose of those cages were for demonstrates that your news sources are doing you a disservice.
 

candycorn

Alis volat propriis
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
74,413
Reaction score
16,197
Points
2,180
It's a simple question based on these facts and I'd like some of you ignorant, uninformed people explain why its is wrong. Here are the facts with links, substantiation...NOT MY subjective opinion...but simple facts.
A) Trump received 95% negative press.
"Former Democratic president Carter comes to President Trump's defense following onslaught of negative coverage."
Broadcast coverage of Trump 95% negative, according to new study
“I’ve been studying the news media and elections for more than 35 years. Trust me — there’s never been anything like it,” said Rich Noyes, research director for the conservative press watchdog.

B) Proof of WHY MSM biased?
90% donations went to Biden by MSM in 2020. In 2016 96% donations to Hillary.
These are facts... that have directly affected the BIASED MSM reporting.
View attachment 443682
95% negative press?

Perhaps he shouldn't have been a 100% asshole...fired people by tweet...called people 3rd grade names....referred to women as dogs....banned people from coming here based on their religion....plopped kids into cages as a "deterrent" (500+ still remain by the way--not one committed a single fucking crime)....argued that the kids he kidnapped aren't entitled to soap and toothpaste...called the neo-nazi's "very fine people...called Mexicans "rapists"...said Russia didn't interfere in our 2016 election....gladhaned a brutal North Korean dictator...lied tens of thousands of times....totally ignored a pandemic as it raged the countryside for weeks at a time.
All of those things you listed is media driven
division.
LOL...

All of what I posted actually happened.
All misrepresented by main stream media.
He called one woman a dog not all women are dogs .
He banned travel from Muslim countries because of their wars not because of their religion.
See how media has twisted that?
All of it twisted into negative hate.
Should the President be calling any woman a "dog"?
He banned Muslims from coming here because of "their wars"? What wars are those?

It wasn't twisted into hate...your blob was and is a hateful sack of shit. Sorry. But it's true.

You sure do always simplify any issue down to the level of understanding of a 10 year old, don't you?
If I could distill it down to the understanding of a 5 year old, perhaps you could meet me half way and understand just how ridiculous you sound...
 

Slade3200

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
38,759
Reaction score
5,991
Points
1,140
p
It's a simple question based on these facts and I'd like some of you ignorant, uninformed people explain why its is wrong. Here are the facts with links, substantiation...NOT MY subjective opinion...but simple facts.
A) Trump received 95% negative press.
"Former Democratic president Carter comes to President Trump's defense following onslaught of negative coverage."
Broadcast coverage of Trump 95% negative, according to new study
“I’ve been studying the news media and elections for more than 35 years. Trust me — there’s never been anything like it,” said Rich Noyes, research director for the conservative press watchdog.

B) Proof of WHY MSM biased?
90% donations went to Biden by MSM in 2020. In 2016 96% donations to Hillary.
These are facts... that have directly affected the BIASED MSM reporting.
View attachment 443682
95% negative press?

Perhaps he shouldn't have been a 100% asshole...fired people by tweet...called people 3rd grade names....referred to women as dogs....banned people from coming here based on their religion....plopped kids into cages as a "deterrent" (500+ still remain by the way--not one committed a single fucking crime)....argued that the kids he kidnapped aren't entitled to soap and toothpaste...called the neo-nazi's "very fine people...called Mexicans "rapists"...said Russia didn't interfere in our 2016 election....gladhaned a brutal North Korean dictator...lied tens of thousands of times....totally ignored a pandemic as it raged the countryside for weeks at a time.
Plopped kids in OBAMA'S CAGES. The rest of that BS is out of context as well like everything else that the MSM spewed for the last four years. They also told us he recommended shooting up bleach--NEVER HAPPENED.
The fact that you guys still continue to tell lies (but you probably don't know it) about what the original purpose of those cages were for demonstrates that your news sources are doing you a disservice.
Why does the original purpose of the cages matter?
 

candycorn

Alis volat propriis
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
74,413
Reaction score
16,197
Points
2,180
p
It's a simple question based on these facts and I'd like some of you ignorant, uninformed people explain why its is wrong. Here are the facts with links, substantiation...NOT MY subjective opinion...but simple facts.
A) Trump received 95% negative press.
"Former Democratic president Carter comes to President Trump's defense following onslaught of negative coverage."
Broadcast coverage of Trump 95% negative, according to new study
“I’ve been studying the news media and elections for more than 35 years. Trust me — there’s never been anything like it,” said Rich Noyes, research director for the conservative press watchdog.

B) Proof of WHY MSM biased?
90% donations went to Biden by MSM in 2020. In 2016 96% donations to Hillary.
These are facts... that have directly affected the BIASED MSM reporting.
View attachment 443682
95% negative press?

Perhaps he shouldn't have been a 100% asshole...fired people by tweet...called people 3rd grade names....referred to women as dogs....banned people from coming here based on their religion....plopped kids into cages as a "deterrent" (500+ still remain by the way--not one committed a single fucking crime)....argued that the kids he kidnapped aren't entitled to soap and toothpaste...called the neo-nazi's "very fine people...called Mexicans "rapists"...said Russia didn't interfere in our 2016 election....gladhaned a brutal North Korean dictator...lied tens of thousands of times....totally ignored a pandemic as it raged the countryside for weeks at a time.
Plopped kids in OBAMA'S CAGES. The rest of that BS is out of context as well like everything else that the MSM spewed for the last four years. They also told us he recommended shooting up bleach--NEVER HAPPENED.
The fact that you guys still continue to tell lies (but you probably don't know it) about what the original purpose of those cages were for demonstrates that your news sources are doing you a disservice.
The average blob supporter understands the following:
  • Importers pay tariffs. Not Exporters
  • Obama built the cages but they were used as a last resort for housing kids for a short period of time. Trump filled them with kids as a deterrent.
  • Trump's trade war was a wholesale disaster. Our trade deficit is pretty much where it was when he started it.
  • Masks, social distancing, rigorous hand washing all save lives
  • The more guns you have in a society, the more gun deaths you'll have in society; and more deaths in general due to the lethality of guns
  • Trump supporters are the ones who stormed the capitol; not BLM supporters
  • There was no sizable voter fraud and Biden beat Trump badly; mainly due to people voting against Trump.
All of this is understood and if you gave blob supporters truth serum, they would agree to all of the above. The "beach muscles" (as I heard it referred to on a podcast this week) that one has on an internet message board allows them to post nonsense like the counter argument to all of the above because there is no downside to sticking to the absurd counter argument. T
 

HappyJoy

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
27,331
Reaction score
3,676
Points
290
p
It's a simple question based on these facts and I'd like some of you ignorant, uninformed people explain why its is wrong. Here are the facts with links, substantiation...NOT MY subjective opinion...but simple facts.
A) Trump received 95% negative press.
"Former Democratic president Carter comes to President Trump's defense following onslaught of negative coverage."
Broadcast coverage of Trump 95% negative, according to new study
“I’ve been studying the news media and elections for more than 35 years. Trust me — there’s never been anything like it,” said Rich Noyes, research director for the conservative press watchdog.

B) Proof of WHY MSM biased?
90% donations went to Biden by MSM in 2020. In 2016 96% donations to Hillary.
These are facts... that have directly affected the BIASED MSM reporting.
View attachment 443682
95% negative press?

Perhaps he shouldn't have been a 100% asshole...fired people by tweet...called people 3rd grade names....referred to women as dogs....banned people from coming here based on their religion....plopped kids into cages as a "deterrent" (500+ still remain by the way--not one committed a single fucking crime)....argued that the kids he kidnapped aren't entitled to soap and toothpaste...called the neo-nazi's "very fine people...called Mexicans "rapists"...said Russia didn't interfere in our 2016 election....gladhaned a brutal North Korean dictator...lied tens of thousands of times....totally ignored a pandemic as it raged the countryside for weeks at a time.
Plopped kids in OBAMA'S CAGES. The rest of that BS is out of context as well like everything else that the MSM spewed for the last four years. They also told us he recommended shooting up bleach--NEVER HAPPENED.
The fact that you guys still continue to tell lies (but you probably don't know it) about what the original purpose of those cages were for demonstrates that your news sources are doing you a disservice.
Why does the original purpose of the cages matter?
The cages weren't intended to be used to strip children from their families and house for months on end only to lose the connection of these kids to their families on the order of thousands and still hundreds appear to be lost forever.

The cages were constructed during a period under the Obama administration when a larger than usual number of unaccompanied children were crossing the border and were used to house these kids for up to 72 hours before being transferred over to HHS.
 

Dogmaphobe

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Messages
17,408
Reaction score
8,683
Points
1,295
Location
Or uh gun
I have always been the type of person to consider the source, myself.

What do they want us to believe ?What words are they using towards that end? Are they appealing to our emotions or our intellect? What are they NOT telling us? How are they framing their coverage? Who benefits if people follow them without questioning?

I don't know if you can actually teach critical thinking skills as much of it is innate, but I think it is possible to at least encourage it. Our school system actually squashes it rather than encouraging it, though, as children are taught to not ask questions but simply accept answers. Compliance is valued over inquiry, and so we have become a nation where fewer and fewer people even ask the question "is this true?"

As the Media becomes more and more an extension of the global elites and sees itself more and more as a tool to shape a compliant society eager to serve this elite, our lack of critical thinking skills is leading us towards dystopia.
What have you seen in our school system to make that statement. I ask because I recently started coaching for my old high school and have been extremely impressed with the intellect and maturity of some of the kids. Some are immature little shits but then again, it is high school. I haven’t noticed the lack of questioning, curiosity and inquisition that you mentioned so I’m curious where you’ve seen it
Well, when my younger son graduated from high school in 2000, they made an ENORMOUS fuss over one girl who received their very top honor - the social justice award. I asked my son about it afterwards and he told me she was just a b student who was this hall monitor control freak type constantly bullying all the other kids.

Meanwhile, his class had one kid who received a full ride scholarship to Yale and they didn't even mention him at all.
 

HappyJoy

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
27,331
Reaction score
3,676
Points
290
p
It's a simple question based on these facts and I'd like some of you ignorant, uninformed people explain why its is wrong. Here are the facts with links, substantiation...NOT MY subjective opinion...but simple facts.
A) Trump received 95% negative press.
"Former Democratic president Carter comes to President Trump's defense following onslaught of negative coverage."
Broadcast coverage of Trump 95% negative, according to new study
“I’ve been studying the news media and elections for more than 35 years. Trust me — there’s never been anything like it,” said Rich Noyes, research director for the conservative press watchdog.

B) Proof of WHY MSM biased?
90% donations went to Biden by MSM in 2020. In 2016 96% donations to Hillary.
These are facts... that have directly affected the BIASED MSM reporting.
View attachment 443682
95% negative press?

Perhaps he shouldn't have been a 100% asshole...fired people by tweet...called people 3rd grade names....referred to women as dogs....banned people from coming here based on their religion....plopped kids into cages as a "deterrent" (500+ still remain by the way--not one committed a single fucking crime)....argued that the kids he kidnapped aren't entitled to soap and toothpaste...called the neo-nazi's "very fine people...called Mexicans "rapists"...said Russia didn't interfere in our 2016 election....gladhaned a brutal North Korean dictator...lied tens of thousands of times....totally ignored a pandemic as it raged the countryside for weeks at a time.
Plopped kids in OBAMA'S CAGES. The rest of that BS is out of context as well like everything else that the MSM spewed for the last four years. They also told us he recommended shooting up bleach--NEVER HAPPENED.
The fact that you guys still continue to tell lies (but you probably don't know it) about what the original purpose of those cages were for demonstrates that your news sources are doing you a disservice.
The average blob supporter understands the following:
  • Importers pay tariffs. Not Exporters
  • Obama built the cages but they were used as a last resort for housing kids for a short period of time. Trump filled them with kids as a deterrent.
  • Trump's trade war was a wholesale disaster. Our trade deficit is pretty much where it was when he started it.
  • Masks, social distancing, rigorous hand washing all save lives
  • The more guns you have in a society, the more gun deaths you'll have in society; and more deaths in general due to the lethality of guns
  • Trump supporters are the ones who stormed the capitol; not BLM supporters
  • There was no sizable voter fraud and Biden beat Trump badly; mainly due to people voting against Trump.
All of this is understood and if you gave blob supporters truth serum, they would agree to all of the above. The "beach muscles" (as I heard it referred to on a podcast this week) that one has on an internet message board allows them to post nonsense like the counter argument to all of the above because there is no downside to sticking to the absurd counter argument. T
Yes, I've come to the same conclusion with many of them. They know they are being lied to and know they are repeating lies.
 

Concerned American

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2020
Messages
3,091
Reaction score
3,199
Points
1,893
Location
In your head
I have always been the type of person to consider the source, myself.

What do they want us to believe ?What words are they using towards that end? Are they appealing to our emotions or our intellect? What are they NOT telling us? How are they framing their coverage? Who benefits if people follow them without questioning?

I don't know if you can actually teach critical thinking skills as much of it is innate, but I think it is possible to at least encourage it. Our school system actually squashes it rather than encouraging it, though, as children are taught to not ask questions but simply accept answers. Compliance is valued over inquiry, and so we have become a nation where fewer and fewer people even ask the question "is this true?"

As the Media becomes more and more an extension of the global elites and sees itself more and more as a tool to shape a compliant society eager to serve this elite, our lack of critical thinking skills is leading us towards dystopia.
What have you seen in our school system to make that statement. I ask because I recently started coaching for my old high school and have been extremely impressed with the intellect and maturity of some of the kids. Some are immature little shits but then again, it is high school. I haven’t noticed the lack of questioning, curiosity and inquisition that you mentioned so I’m curious where you’ve seen it
Well, when my younger son graduated from high school in 2000, they made an ENORMOUS fuss over one girl who received their very top honor - the social justice award. I asked my son about it afterwards and he told me she was just a b student who was this hall monitor control freak type constantly bullying all the other kids.

Meanwhile, his class had one kid who received a full ride scholarship to Yale and they didn't even mention him at all.
Everybody gets a trophy. Pffffft.
 

Slade3200

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
38,759
Reaction score
5,991
Points
1,140
p
It's a simple question based on these facts and I'd like some of you ignorant, uninformed people explain why its is wrong. Here are the facts with links, substantiation...NOT MY subjective opinion...but simple facts.
A) Trump received 95% negative press.
"Former Democratic president Carter comes to President Trump's defense following onslaught of negative coverage."
Broadcast coverage of Trump 95% negative, according to new study
“I’ve been studying the news media and elections for more than 35 years. Trust me — there’s never been anything like it,” said Rich Noyes, research director for the conservative press watchdog.

B) Proof of WHY MSM biased?
90% donations went to Biden by MSM in 2020. In 2016 96% donations to Hillary.
These are facts... that have directly affected the BIASED MSM reporting.
View attachment 443682
95% negative press?

Perhaps he shouldn't have been a 100% asshole...fired people by tweet...called people 3rd grade names....referred to women as dogs....banned people from coming here based on their religion....plopped kids into cages as a "deterrent" (500+ still remain by the way--not one committed a single fucking crime)....argued that the kids he kidnapped aren't entitled to soap and toothpaste...called the neo-nazi's "very fine people...called Mexicans "rapists"...said Russia didn't interfere in our 2016 election....gladhaned a brutal North Korean dictator...lied tens of thousands of times....totally ignored a pandemic as it raged the countryside for weeks at a time.
Plopped kids in OBAMA'S CAGES. The rest of that BS is out of context as well like everything else that the MSM spewed for the last four years. They also told us he recommended shooting up bleach--NEVER HAPPENED.
The fact that you guys still continue to tell lies (but you probably don't know it) about what the original purpose of those cages were for demonstrates that your news sources are doing you a disservice.
Why does the original purpose of the cages matter?
The cages weren't intended to be used to strip children from their families and house for months on end only to lose the connection of these kids to their families on the order of thousands and still hundreds appear to be lost forever.

The cages were constructed during a period under the Obama administration when a larger than usual number of unaccompanied children were crossing the border and were used to house these kids for up to 72 hours before being transferred over to HHS.
Ok and again I’ll ask how that is relevant to how Trump has used them and handled the situation. You know that even if Obama built and used them to torture babies it wouldn’t make any inappropriate actions by Trump magically OK, right? Bringing up Obama is a wahtaboutism, a distraction from what we are discussing
 

Slade3200

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
38,759
Reaction score
5,991
Points
1,140
I have always been the type of person to consider the source, myself.

What do they want us to believe ?What words are they using towards that end? Are they appealing to our emotions or our intellect? What are they NOT telling us? How are they framing their coverage? Who benefits if people follow them without questioning?

I don't know if you can actually teach critical thinking skills as much of it is innate, but I think it is possible to at least encourage it. Our school system actually squashes it rather than encouraging it, though, as children are taught to not ask questions but simply accept answers. Compliance is valued over inquiry, and so we have become a nation where fewer and fewer people even ask the question "is this true?"

As the Media becomes more and more an extension of the global elites and sees itself more and more as a tool to shape a compliant society eager to serve this elite, our lack of critical thinking skills is leading us towards dystopia.
What have you seen in our school system to make that statement. I ask because I recently started coaching for my old high school and have been extremely impressed with the intellect and maturity of some of the kids. Some are immature little shits but then again, it is high school. I haven’t noticed the lack of questioning, curiosity and inquisition that you mentioned so I’m curious where you’ve seen it
Well, when my younger son graduated from high school in 2000, they made an ENORMOUS fuss over one girl who received their very top honor - the social justice award. I asked my son about it afterwards and he told me she was just a b student who was this hall monitor control freak type constantly bullying all the other kids.

Meanwhile, his class had one kid who received a full ride scholarship to Yale and they didn't even mention him at all.
Are you sure your kid was being accurate in the way he described the girl? I’m smelling an incomplete story there. What exactly was the criteria for the Social Justice award? Doesn’t sound to be academically focused. But regardless, I don’t see what that story has to do with the discussion we were having
 

Mac1958

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2011
Messages
80,959
Reaction score
25,326
Points
2,280
Location
Opposing Authoritarian Ideological Fundamentalism.
Fact 1: The press largely leans left.

Fact 2: Dismissing everything they say as fake news is comically simplistic and ignorant.
Well, yeah....look at your average trump cultist.
A pretty brilliant move by talk radio, you have to admit: "Don't listen to the enemy, just listen to me. I speak da troof".

Trump focused on that ignorant, paranoid audience and got elected.
 

Slade3200

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
38,759
Reaction score
5,991
Points
1,140
Fact 1: The press largely leans left.

Fact 2: Dismissing everything they say as fake news is comically simplistic and ignorant.
Well, yeah....look at your average trump cultist.
A pretty brilliant move by talk radio, you have to admit: "Don't listen to the enemy, just listen to me. I speak da troof".

Trump focused on that ignorant, paranoid audience and got elected.
Dude, he have the medal of freedom to Rush during the state of the union!!!! The ridiculousness of this guy is going to be mocked for centuries
 

HappyJoy

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
27,331
Reaction score
3,676
Points
290
p
It's a simple question based on these facts and I'd like some of you ignorant, uninformed people explain why its is wrong. Here are the facts with links, substantiation...NOT MY subjective opinion...but simple facts.
A) Trump received 95% negative press.
"Former Democratic president Carter comes to President Trump's defense following onslaught of negative coverage."
Broadcast coverage of Trump 95% negative, according to new study
“I’ve been studying the news media and elections for more than 35 years. Trust me — there’s never been anything like it,” said Rich Noyes, research director for the conservative press watchdog.

B) Proof of WHY MSM biased?
90% donations went to Biden by MSM in 2020. In 2016 96% donations to Hillary.
These are facts... that have directly affected the BIASED MSM reporting.
View attachment 443682
95% negative press?

Perhaps he shouldn't have been a 100% asshole...fired people by tweet...called people 3rd grade names....referred to women as dogs....banned people from coming here based on their religion....plopped kids into cages as a "deterrent" (500+ still remain by the way--not one committed a single fucking crime)....argued that the kids he kidnapped aren't entitled to soap and toothpaste...called the neo-nazi's "very fine people...called Mexicans "rapists"...said Russia didn't interfere in our 2016 election....gladhaned a brutal North Korean dictator...lied tens of thousands of times....totally ignored a pandemic as it raged the countryside for weeks at a time.
Plopped kids in OBAMA'S CAGES. The rest of that BS is out of context as well like everything else that the MSM spewed for the last four years. They also told us he recommended shooting up bleach--NEVER HAPPENED.
The fact that you guys still continue to tell lies (but you probably don't know it) about what the original purpose of those cages were for demonstrates that your news sources are doing you a disservice.
Why does the original purpose of the cages matter?
The cages weren't intended to be used to strip children from their families and house for months on end only to lose the connection of these kids to their families on the order of thousands and still hundreds appear to be lost forever.

The cages were constructed during a period under the Obama administration when a larger than usual number of unaccompanied children were crossing the border and were used to house these kids for up to 72 hours before being transferred over to HHS.
Ok and again I’ll ask how that is relevant to how Trump has used them and handled the situation. You know that even if Obama built and used them to torture babies it wouldn’t make any inappropriate actions by Trump magically OK, right? Bringing up Obama is a wahtaboutism, a distraction from what we are discussing
Ah, I see what you are saying. It is a whataboutism for sure. Additionally it's a lie told to normalize Trump.
 

Care4all

Warrior Princess
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
57,450
Reaction score
15,765
Points
2,220
Location
Maine
Fact 1: The press largely leans left.

Fact 2: Dismissing everything they say as fake news is comically simplistic and ignorant.
Misinterpreting his words is fake.
They did not report any of the good things Trump did.
What good thing did Trump do for all Americans, or not self serving? Just one, that you think was really good, for all of us....?
 

Care4all

Warrior Princess
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
57,450
Reaction score
15,765
Points
2,220
Location
Maine
I bet ya 100% of all the conservative news media, gave their campaign donations to Trump or republicans..... it works both ways, no?
 
OP
H

healthmyths

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Messages
22,617
Reaction score
5,223
Points
280
p
It's a simple question based on these facts and I'd like some of you ignorant, uninformed people explain why its is wrong. Here are the facts with links, substantiation...NOT MY subjective opinion...but simple facts.
A) Trump received 95% negative press.
"Former Democratic president Carter comes to President Trump's defense following onslaught of negative coverage."
Broadcast coverage of Trump 95% negative, according to new study
“I’ve been studying the news media and elections for more than 35 years. Trust me — there’s never been anything like it,” said Rich Noyes, research director for the conservative press watchdog.

B) Proof of WHY MSM biased?
90% donations went to Biden by MSM in 2020. In 2016 96% donations to Hillary.
These are facts... that have directly affected the BIASED MSM reporting.
View attachment 443682
95% negative press?

Perhaps he shouldn't have been a 100% asshole...fired people by tweet...called people 3rd grade names....referred to women as dogs....banned people from coming here based on their religion....plopped kids into cages as a "deterrent" (500+ still remain by the way--not one committed a single fucking crime)....argued that the kids he kidnapped aren't entitled to soap and toothpaste...called the neo-nazi's "very fine people...called Mexicans "rapists"...said Russia didn't interfere in our 2016 election....gladhaned a brutal North Korean dictator...lied tens of thousands of times....totally ignored a pandemic as it raged the countryside for weeks at a time.
Plopped kids in OBAMA'S CAGES. The rest of that BS is out of context as well like everything else that the MSM spewed for the last four years. They also told us he recommended shooting up bleach--NEVER HAPPENED.
The fact that you guys still continue to tell lies (but you probably don't know it) about what the original purpose of those cages were for demonstrates that your news sources are doing you a disservice.
The average blob supporter understands the following:
  • Importers pay tariffs. Not Exporters
  • Obama built the cages but they were used as a last resort for housing kids for a short period of time. Trump filled them with kids as a deterrent.
  • Trump's trade war was a wholesale disaster. Our trade deficit is pretty much where it was when he started it.
  • Masks, social distancing, rigorous hand washing all save lives
  • The more guns you have in a society, the more gun deaths you'll have in society; and more deaths in general due to the lethality of guns
  • Trump supporters are the ones who stormed the capitol; not BLM supporters
  • There was no sizable voter fraud and Biden beat Trump badly; mainly due to people voting against Trump.
All of this is understood and if you gave blob supporters truth serum, they would agree to all of the above. The "beach muscles" (as I heard it referred to on a podcast this week) that one has on an internet message board allows them to post nonsense like the counter argument to all of the above because there is no downside to sticking to the absurd counter argument.
Where did you get the information under your bullet points?
NOT one URL, fact or link! Don't believe anything you wrote as there is no substantiation!
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top