On This Day in History

[Toddsterpatriot]

Nothing is dumber than an American Christian Zionist.

Except you.

 

[gipper]

Are you late for your SS meeting.?

He’s never late for that. He absolutely loves those meetings.

 

[gipper]

Except you.

A Nazi supporting genocide needs to recognize his place.

Lower than a cockroach.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

A Nazi supporting genocide needs to recognize his place.

Lower than a cockroach.

Wow, big words from Sinwar's ex.

 

[Soupnazi630]

You belong to the Nazis were bad but Communists were worse Brigade thats why you are pissed off the Nazis lost the war and the Soviets kicked their Arse back to Berlin.

That is not a brigae you stupid idiot it is documented history

Why would anyone be pissed off at the nazis losing if they were evil??

How does recognizing the evils of the USSR detract from the evils of the third reich??

Give a clear answer if you are able

I will tell you why because he always brings the Russians into the debate with the Nazis were bad but the Russians were worse, what can be worse than the industrial murder of jews and others in places like Auschwitz, he is just pissed off the Soviets won the war.

Wrong

You are completely full of shit

What can be worse than Auschwitz and the holocaust is the Holodomor. Which was deliperately engineered genocide level mass murder of millions by starvation.

Apparently you are massively ignorant about how starvation works, when people are forced to eat their own dead relatives and even their own dead children. This is precisely what the communists did. There is little more horrible than that. In fact a gas chamber is relatively humane in that it is over much faster for the vitcims.

The soviets were WORSE than the nazis, That is documented fact which ignorant fools like you ignore. NO ONE here is denying that the nazis were high level evil but acknowedging the other great evil of the wtenntieth century is simply intelligent.

No one here is making it an either or argument EXCEPT YOU.

You are like a fool who thinks a mass murderer is worse than a serial killer of the other way around.

Others are acknowedging the evils of BOTH

The diffeence between the two is that the world tried national socialism ONCE and realized it was a catastrophe. But idiots like yoy defend and apologize for communism which is tried over and over and over with murderous and disasterous results.

 

[odanny]

The soviets were WORSE than the nazis, That is documented fact which ignorant fools like you ignore. NO ONE here is denying that the nazis were high level evil but acknowedging the other great evil of the wtenntieth century is simply intelligent.

The Soviets being worse is arguable, they had a much longer time frame to carry out their atrocities, the question is were they worse in any 12 year period than the Nazis? Comapring death rates of the Holodomor to the Holocaust, over the same time frame, is an interesting argument, but the execution of the Nazi's and the industrial scale on which it occurred gives them the edge here.

The Holocaust did not occur over a 12 year period, it was compressed within that time frame towards the end.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The Soviets being worse is arguable, they had a much longer time frame to carry out their atrocities, the question is were they worse in any 12 year period than the Nazis? Comapring death rates of the Holodomor to the Holocaust, over the same time frame, is an interesting argument.

I can admit that the whole thing is arguable. How do you actually measure this kind of evil?

One can say as you do that the soviets had more time ( but not really all that much more ) as did the chinese communists or the cambodian or vietnamese or cuban or other various communist nations who do the same thing on one scale or another.

One can also point to overall death rates which is just as valid in which cases the soviets were far worse.

The argument is valid one way or the other however the real point is that acknowledging the evils of one does not mean one is defending the other which is what that idiot Deadstick believes.

While trying to come up with a measurement of which was worse might be arguable in some ways it does not make sense to say the nazis were worse because they used factories. Death by starvation or the gulag is just as horrific to the victim.

 

[Deadstick]

That is not a brigae you stupid idiot it is documented history

Why would anyone be pissed off at the nazis losing if they were evil??

How does recognizing the evils of the USSR detract from the evils of the third reich??

Give a clear answer if you are able

Wrong

You are completely full of shit

What can be worse than Auschwitz and the holocaust is the Holodomor. Which was deliperately engineered genocide level mass murder of millions by starvation.

Apparently you are massively ignorant about how starvation works, when people are forced to eat their own dead relatives and even their own dead children. This is precisely what the communists did. There is little more horrible than that. In fact a gas chamber is relatively humane in that it is over much faster for the vitcims.

The soviets were WORSE than the nazis, That is documented fact which ignorant fools like you ignore. NO ONE here is denying that the nazis were high level evil but acknowedging the other great evil of the wtenntieth century is simply intelligent.

No one here is making it an either or argument EXCEPT YOU.

You are like a fool who thinks a mass murderer is worse than a serial killer of the other way around.

Others are acknowedging the evils of BOTH

The diffeence between the two is that the world tried national socialism ONCE and realized it was a catastrophe. But idiots like yoy defend and apologize for communism which is tried over and over and over with murderous and disasterous results.

Calm down Nazi you will have a heart attack, the so called Holodomor didn't discriminate between Ukrainians and Russians you prick many people died, and walking into a gas chamber was better, do me a favour Nazi boy.

 

[Deadstick]

I can admit that the whole thing is arguable. How do you actually measure this kind of evil?

One can say as you do that the soviets had more time ( but not really all that much more ) as did the chinese communists or the cambodian or vietnamese or cuban or other various communist nations who do the same thing on one scale or another.

One can also point to overall death rates which is just as valid in which cases the soviets were far worse.

The argument is valid one way or the other however the real point is that acknowledging the evils of one does not mean one is defending the other which is what that idiot Deadstick believes.

While trying to come up with a measurement of which was worse might be arguable in some ways it does not make sense to say the nazis were worse because they used factories. Death by starvation or the gulag is just as horrific to the victim.

Why not bring European Colonialism into the equation? King Leopold killed between 10 and 20 million in the Congo alone, the Colonial authorities genocided the population in Tasmania, not to mention all the other Colonies, millions died in India under British Colonial rule.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Why not bring European Colonialism into the equation? King Leopold killed between 10 and 20 million in the Congo alone, the Colonial authorities genocided the population in Tasmania, not to mention all the other Colonies, millions died in India under British Colonial rule.

No he did not

King leopold introduced modern ( for the time ) health care education and infrastructure into the congo. His govvernment fought to end the practice of hand amputation and to end slavery

The tales of genocide and hand mutilation is manjfactured fiction.

Millions died in India because india remains a filthy third world cesspool not because of the british

 

[Soupnazi630]

Calm down Nazi you will have a heart attack, the so called Holodomor didn't discriminate between Ukrainians and Russians you prick many people died, and walking into a gas chamber was better, do me a favour Nazi boy.

I AM doing you a favor nitwit I am educating you but you are too childish to learn

I never said the holodomor discriminated.

Tens of millions died on the communists of the soviet union mainly under Stalin

ANd yues a gfast death is better than starving to death which takes months'

You are a ******* fool and the closest we have ato a nazi here you ******* racist prick

 

[Litwin]

King leopold introduced modern ( for the time ) health care education and infrastructure into the congo.

+ The war resulted in tens of thousands of deaths among both combatants and civilians,[3] and significantly altered the political and economic geography of the Congo. The SLAVE market around Nyangwe ceased to exist, ...[48]

Congo Arab war - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Belgian military heroism wipes out the (Arab) slave trader, (modified) inscription on the Monument to the Belgian Pioneers in Congo in Cinquantenaire Park, Brussels

 

[Litwin]

That was all before the Soviet union existed Russia was under the Royalist Czar, there has ben antisemitism all over Europe for centuries, there were pogroms against Jews in the English city of York in the 13th century.

Do you support the neo‑Romanov empire or the long‑gone Bolshevik imperialists? Or both, like 90% of Moscow imperialists do today?

Black Hundreds - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Russian Community Extremists Becoming the Black Hundreds of Today - Jamestown

jamestown.org

Putin’s dreams of a new Russian Empire are unraveling in Ukraine

Putin saw the invasion of Ukraine as a key step toward rebuilding the Russian Empire. Instead, it has forced countries across the former Soviet Union to distance themselves from the Kremlin, writes Mark Temnycky.

www.atlanticcouncil.org

 

[Litwin]

You belong to the Nazis were bad but Communists were worse Brigade thats why you are pissed off the Nazis lost the war and the Soviets kicked their Arse back to Berlin.

Poland extends WW2 reparations campaign to the Moscow empire​

Post in thread 'Poland extends WW2 reparations campaign to Moscow empire'

Apr 28, 2026

• Litwin

 

[Deadstick]

No he did not

King leopold introduced modern ( for the time ) health care education and infrastructure into the congo. His govvernment fought to end the practice of hand amputation and to end slavery

The tales of genocide and hand mutilation is manjfactured fiction.

Millions died in India because india remains a filthy third world cesspool not because of the british

You are in serious denial of historical facts and reality.

 

[Deadstick]

I AM doing you a favor nitwit I am educating you but you are too childish to learn

I never said the holodomor discriminated.

Tens of millions died on the communists of the soviet union mainly under Stalin

ANd yues a gfast death is better than starving to death which takes months'

You are a ******* fool and the closest we have ato a nazi here you ******* racist prick

No i am educating you, it's like trying to teach an Ape to read and write.



Like
Dislike

King Leopold II’s rule over the Congo Free State (1885–1908) resulted in the deaths of an estimated 10 to 15 million Congolese through forced labor, violence, and systemic terror.​

Background and Context​

King Leopold II of Belgium acquired the Congo Free State as his personal possession during the Berlin Conference of 1884–1885, under the guise of a philanthropic mission to civilize the region Wikipedia+1. The territory, over 2.6 million km²—more than 85 times the size of Belgium—was rich in natural resources, particularly ivory and rubber Wikipedia+1. Leopold’s primary motivation was economic gain, and he established a brutal system of exploitation to extract wealth from the region World History Edu+1.

Mechanisms of Atrocities​

To maximize rubber production, Leopold’s administration imposed harsh quotas on the Congolese population. Villages that failed to meet quotas faced violent reprisals, including killings, mutilations, and destruction of homes talkafricana.com+1. Women and children were often taken hostage to force men into labor, and soldiers were required to provide proof of kills, sometimes through severed hands, to account for bullets used talkafricana.com+1. These practices, combined with famine, disease, and population displacement, caused a dramatic decline in the Congolese population Wikipedia+1.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No i am educating you, it's like trying to teach an Ape to read and write.


Like
Dislike

King Leopold II’s rule over the Congo Free State (1885–1908) resulted in the deaths of an estimated 10 to 15 million Congolese through forced labor, violence, and systemic terror.​

Background and Context​

King Leopold II of Belgium acquired the Congo Free State as his personal possession during the Berlin Conference of 1884–1885, under the guise of a philanthropic mission to civilize the region Wikipedia+1. The territory, over 2.6 million km²—more than 85 times the size of Belgium—was rich in natural resources, particularly ivory and rubber Wikipedia+1. Leopold’s primary motivation was economic gain, and he established a brutal system of exploitation to extract wealth from the region World History Edu+1.

Mechanisms of Atrocities​

To maximize rubber production, Leopold’s administration imposed harsh quotas on the Congolese population. Villages that failed to meet quotas faced violent reprisals, including killings, mutilations, and destruction of homes talkafricana.com+1. Women and children were often taken hostage to force men into labor, and soldiers were required to provide proof of kills, sometimes through severed hands, to account for bullets used talkafricana.com+1. These practices, combined with famine, disease, and population displacement, caused a dramatic decline in the Congolese population Wikipedia+1.

Sorry wrong boy you are proving your stupidy

You are now repeating yourself with revisionist tripe which has long sinee been disproven

The quota system with reprisals did not exist after Leopold took over the congo

There was no such forced decline of the congolese population

 

[Soupnazi630]

You are in serious denial of historical facts and reality.

Nope I am stating fact and reality you are stating fiction

Much like you did about Vietnam and everything else you spew which I correct and disprove

 

[Deadstick]

Nope I am stating fact and reality you are stating fiction

Much like you did about Vietnam and everything else you spew which I correct and disprove

You are in denial about everything in history that isn't convenient for your world view, next you will be telling us Auschwitz was a theme park or there was no slavey in the US.

 

[Soupnazi630]

You are in denial about everything in history that isn't convenient for your world view, next you will be telling us Auschwitz was a theme park or there was no slavey in the US.

No I am in full acceptance of facts which you do not post

how many ******* times must I repeat that Hitler was evil the holocaust was real and yes there was slavery in the US

I have said these things many timesand you try to bait me into saying something Absurd

Listen carefully boy the legend of genocide and hand mutilation under Leopold is revisionist FICTION. It was anti western propaganda dreamed up by idiots like you

YOU CANNOT refute that fact with evidence

You simplty repeated your self saying unn unnh

You ae backwards and stuck on repeaty but very very stupid now learn from your betters boy