On Racism and Racial Discrimination

[sealybobo]

Wait, let me guess, youre going to figure out a way to completely avoid my challenge. Just so we are clear, when you do predictably avoid it, that is the moment i win the debate.

Which "group" is more racist. Your post proves that YOU are the most racist.

Where did you pull that from? Definitely not, actually your regressive group is the most racist.

Let's make quick comparison.

Normal people, who do not value racism:


You, the ultimate race baiting racist bigot, with huge self interest in preserving racism:



Based on this I think it's rather clear who the ultimate racist is. Congratulations!

Your weak deflections have been noted by the board. Do you have anything else to contribute here, or are you done?

It is true blacks would be up in arms if a mob of whites beat down a black but because blacks are a minority they seem to get a pass.

Blacks need to realize we lower the bar for them on stuff like this. What we wouldn't expect from whites we allow you to do because you are a protected minority.

I've seen bad behavior and poor work performance tolerated by an employer because the person was black.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Could you give an example of a white person being "nasty" to someone of a different race based on your own experience? Like what that person said and did?

A black guy applies for a job but because my boss has a negative opinion of blacks, he doesn't hire him.

Im of the opinion we need to make up for the past 200 years and take a chance on the brother.

But, what if black employees never work out? I see black people working at Kroger but 2 weeks later they aren't there anymore?

For the most part, a business person has one favorite color--Green!

The employe that makes the employer the most green is that employers favorite employee.

Speaking of Korger, I just came home from Giant Eagle. The black woman that checked me out was slower than a four year old. They should have had a movie screen so we had something to watch while she slowly scanned the items.

Granted, she must have been new, because the supervisor approached her and told her not to put my box of doughnuts on the bottom of the cart. I seriously doubt I'll see her there next time I go shopping, but it has nothing to do with her race.

Im sure you get a lot of bad workers applying at places like Kroger's.

God bless places like Kroger willing to give anybody a chance. If they didn't what would a lot of lazy ignorant Americans do? I'm not making fun or trying to be mean. Lucky there are places that need help so they're not too picky like they probably should be.

Or raise how much they pay and don't have the turnover.

I remember back in the 70s working at Kroger's was a profession. My aunt owned a home single mom raised 2 kids working at krogers

This is true, but those days are long gone. We no longer support non-skilled workers any longer. Today, you must have something going for you to make it to or maintain middle-class status.

I went for my doctors appointment a few months ago. When I approached the check-in desk, it was empty and the lights behind the desk were unlit. A woman came from the main waiting room to escort me to the new kiosks. Now you have to check yourself in.

The workers don't like it and neither do most of the patients, but we continue to have machines replace human workers in this country. It's cheaper, and most Americans like cheaper.

On the subject of grocery stores, my store is opening up more and more self serve checkouts. The stores are slowly trying to pressure customers into using them instead of the human checkouts. I'm sure down the road, a cashier will be a thing of the past as well.

Will Americans ever reject kiosks at McDonald's or clinics; will we ever refuse to deal with a bank or merchandise company that uses voice machines or customer service people from India; will we ever refuse to use the self-serve checkouts at stores? I doubt it, but that's what it would take to create good paying non-skilled jobs again.

 

[dannyboys]

America holds far more cultures then China. The family standards and values in China also happen to be higher and more strictly enforced. Ignorance is NOT rewarded in China... Check this thread.
Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Interesting thread.
It seems to me that you are very concerned about the "quality" (if you would) of immigrants in America. Do you think most Americans share such concerns with you?

Do you believe the Chinese government doesn't discriminate on who is allowed to legally live in China NOT based 100% on the "quality" of the applicant?
Name me one 'civilized' country on the planet who doesn't screen applicants based on their "quality".
You can't because no country exists.
You own a middle class clean well kept quite apartment building. A 'welfare family' with six teenage kids applies to rent one of your apartments. What do YOU do?
Ya fucking RIGHT!
Same goes with civilized countries.

 

[dannyboys]

America holds far more cultures then China. The family standards and values in China also happen to be higher and more strictly enforced. Ignorance is NOT rewarded in China... Check this thread.
Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Interesting thread.
It seems to me that you are very concerned about the "quality" (if you would) of immigrants in America. Do you think most Americans share such concerns with you?

All decent Americans are very concerned with keeping their country as free as possible from anyone who wants to destroy their country.
We already have millions of low-lifes mooching off the 'Makers'.

 

[dannyboys]

Thanks for opening up a substantive discussion
1. In your own word, how would you define racism and racial discrimination?
I define racism as actions or language with the intension of harming, oppressing, insulting, or demeaning a person or group of people solely based on their race.
2. Do you agree or disagree that racial discrimination is among the top three most serious social problems nowadays in America?
I think racial discrimination has been an ongoing problem for centuries but has come a long way in America. There is still plenty of progress to be made, however, I would name National Security, our Jobs/Economy, and Education as the top three most important issues... Followed closely by the Environment, a Corrupt political campaign system, and wealth inequality.
3. Do you agree or disagree that more laws and regulations should be enacted to protect people from racial discrimination?
There is a limit to what laws and regulations can accomplish and in many cases they can add fuel to the fire. So I would say No to your question. I would rather see funds and energy put into programs that support social acceptance and support. I think better education and community programs are the best way to promote a more accepting environment.

Thanks!
You are the first one who actually answered all the questions on my list!

A friend here just gave us a few examples of "nasty" comments against Asians.

When i was at school this guy used to say, "its a bit nippy" and rub his arms like it was cold, when an asian student was nearby. It was very white when i was akid so not many ethnics. It was pretty mean.

The other day i gave this drugo a lift. When someone drove badly he said, "he must have been asian because he doesnt see well". it wasnt that bad because it wasnt in earshot of an asian person. But after chuckling, i realized it wasnt nice and said nothing.

To some, the comments made in these examples may appear "insulting and demeaning". Would you use the word "racist" to describe those people in the examples? If not, why?

Clearly, you do not believe that racial discrimination is among the most important issues faced by America. However, you also suggested that there is plenty of progress to be made. What do you think is the most needed progress?

Lastly, what do you think about the affirmative actions (especially those supported by laws)? In particular, what is your take on affirmative actions with respect to education?

Does your country have Affirmative Action? If not why not?
Only in America are people so fucking nuts they would hire anyone based on the color of their skin!

 

[dannyboys]

AA is bullsh#t. Higher education should be based on ethics/ability and merit NOT color.

If someone makes the following argument:

Certain group of people, e.g. the black, suffer from significantly lower level of education in an average sense. Consequently, they tend to be less successful and cause serious problems (e.g. crimes). If left unattended, the vicious cycle would continue and the situation get worse over time. Therefore, something has to be done to break such cycle. The most effective way of doing it is through better education, which cannot be offered to them if the criteria is solely merit-based.

Why is he wrong?

For ONCE use your head!
The US education system was designed to educate kids with an average IQ of 110-115. That's a fucking FACT!!!!!
The average negro kid has an IQ in the low eighties. Another scientific FACT!!!!!
That's the essence of the problem. There is not today a single predominantly negro country which is remotely close to being a safe prosperous place to live. Not one!
The fucking LIBs refuse to accept this reality. Their 'solution' has been to 'stream' nego kids through school. To 'dumb-down the curriculum. 'AA' is a joke. It hasn't worked.

 

[Unkotare]

It's funny to see some ^^^ dimwits so stupid and fearful that they define themselves by their racism, trying to discuss education.

 

[Slade3200]

AA is bullsh#t. Higher education should be based on ethics/ability and merit NOT color.

If someone makes the following argument:

Certain group of people, e.g. the black, suffer from significantly lower level of education in an average sense. Consequently, they tend to be less successful and cause serious problems (e.g. crimes). If left unattended, the vicious cycle would continue and the situation get worse over time. Therefore, something has to be done to break such cycle. The most effective way of doing it is through better education, which cannot be offered to them if the criteria is solely merit-based.

Why is he wrong?

For ONCE use your head!
The US education system was designed to educate kids with an average IQ of 110-115. That's a fucking FACT!!!!!
The average negro kid has an IQ in the low eighties. Another scientific FACT!!!!!
That's the essence of the problem. There is not today a single predominantly negro country which is remotely close to being a safe prosperous place to live. Not one!
The fucking LIBs refuse to accept this reality. Their 'solution' has been to 'stream' nego kids through school. To 'dumb-down the curriculum. 'AA' is a joke. It hasn't worked.

Your garbage opinions are worthless and do more to dumb down the environment. Classic example of how racial discrimination is still alive and well. You do realize that it's your attitude that instigates AA type policy... Is that lightbulb going off yet?

 

[Norman]

It's funny to see some ^^^ dimwits so stupid and fearful that they define themselves by their racism, trying to discuss education.

This must be a case example of the liberal regressive "factophobia". Instead of admitting facts, throw down the racist card, because that will somehow erase the fact.


Just wait till the regressives are done with their muslim immigration programs. The muslim average IQ is even less than that of blacks, or according to my estimation, about that of the average USMB regressive liberal. As a bonus they have one of the most evil ideologies devised.

However, I have never heard that US educational system was developed for 115 average IQ, that's probably a bit of bullcrap...

 

[dannyboys]

AA is bullsh#t. Higher education should be based on ethics/ability and merit NOT color.

If someone makes the following argument:

Certain group of people, e.g. the black, suffer from significantly lower level of education in an average sense. Consequently, they tend to be less successful and cause serious problems (e.g. crimes). If left unattended, the vicious cycle would continue and the situation get worse over time. Therefore, something has to be done to break such cycle. The most effective way of doing it is through better education, which cannot be offered to them if the criteria is solely merit-based.

Why is he wrong?

Tell you what YOU compare the Asian culture to the Negro here in America directly. Who is farther ahead? Asians.
Which is the less violent culture? Asians.
Who has better family structure? Asians.
Who has made more economic gains? Asians.

Who has been here longer? Negros.
Who has more AA? Negros.
What group has shown no willingness to educate themselves? Negros

So you tell me is your future and your countries future better spent and invested in which group?

If "Negros" as you say, are the problem then that is the group that needs the focused attention. The answer is better education and more support, resources, and opportunity. If you feel that they are the anchor slowing down the ship then why focus on making a better sail? Focus on pulling up the anchor and you are going to have a much better ride.

Negroes are not any sort of 'anchor slowing down the ship'. They have basically become irrelevant to the US economy as far as what they contribute.
The 'ship' has left the harbor without them already.
Sure we have to 'pretend' to be interested in holding their hands from cradle to grave.
The negro race has a general IQ in the low eighties living in a country of people with an IQ generally between 110-115.
Do the fucking math!

 

[Unkotare]

Dummyboy talking about anyone else's IQ is hilariously ironic.

 

[Slade3200]

AA is bullsh#t. Higher education should be based on ethics/ability and merit NOT color.

If someone makes the following argument:

Certain group of people, e.g. the black, suffer from significantly lower level of education in an average sense. Consequently, they tend to be less successful and cause serious problems (e.g. crimes). If left unattended, the vicious cycle would continue and the situation get worse over time. Therefore, something has to be done to break such cycle. The most effective way of doing it is through better education, which cannot be offered to them if the criteria is solely merit-based.

Why is he wrong?

Tell you what YOU compare the Asian culture to the Negro here in America directly. Who is farther ahead? Asians.
Which is the less violent culture? Asians.
Who has better family structure? Asians.
Who has made more economic gains? Asians.

Who has been here longer? Negros.
Who has more AA? Negros.
What group has shown no willingness to educate themselves? Negros

So you tell me is your future and your countries future better spent and invested in which group?

If "Negros" as you say, are the problem then that is the group that needs the focused attention. The answer is better education and more support, resources, and opportunity. If you feel that they are the anchor slowing down the ship then why focus on making a better sail? Focus on pulling up the anchor and you are going to have a much better ride.

Negroes are not any sort of 'anchor slowing down the ship'. They have basically become irrelevant to the US economy as far as what they contribute.
The 'ship' has left the harbor without them already.
Sure we have to 'pretend' to be interested in holding their hands from cradle to grave.
The negro race has a general IQ in the low eighties living in a country of people with an IQ generally between 110-115.
Do the fucking math!

I couldnt care less about what some shitty poll says about IQs, only an idiot would believe that it's even possible to get this data... And even if it is true... So fucking what??? What's your point? Blacks are dumb so they shouldn't go to school? I feel stupider after reading you dumbshit posts, what should we do with idiots like you?

 

[dannyboys]

I'd like to have a discussion about racism with you guys, from a visitor's (I'm a Chinese visiting researcher) perspective. I am genuinely curious about how Americans think about the problem of racism. I have a short list of questions as a starter. I would appreciate it a lot if you could share rational and honest opinions.

1. In your own word, how would you define racism and racial discrimination?

Racism is a primitive form of collectivism. It is the belief that the thoughts and attitudes of a person are the result of their lineage rather then a result of their culture and experiences. Racism is the concept that the thoughts, actions and attitudes of people are passed through birth to successive generations.

Racial discrimination is the treatment of people based on the belief that race dictates who that person is.

2. Do you agree or disagree that racial discrimination is among the top three most serious social problems nowadays in America?

Disagree, though there are forces at work increasing the the instances and severity of racism. Over the last 8 years, racism has grown exponentially in this country.

3. Do you agree or disagree that more laws and regulations should be enacted to protect people from racial discrimination?

Disagree.

Racism cannot be solved by edicts from rulers. It is a cultural, not a legal problem.

I don't agree with the whole Obama made racism worse argument. Sometimes when you bring issues to the surface they ignite. One could say that slavery wasn't a problem until the revolt and civil war. So did Lincoln make slavery worse? When you want to instigate change it results in debate and pushback so there is always an illusion of digression through the process of progression.

I agree that there is no need for more laws/regulations, however, I don't agree that "racism can't be solved by edicts from rulers" as you say, the laws that were put on the books during the civil rights movement helped carve a path towards massive progression, i don't see how you can deny that.

"Massive Progression"? Give some examples.
MLK's work was destroyed by the likes of Farrakhan and Sharpton and Jackson to name a few and all the other 'race whores'.

 

[Slade3200]

I'd like to have a discussion about racism with you guys, from a visitor's (I'm a Chinese visiting researcher) perspective. I am genuinely curious about how Americans think about the problem of racism. I have a short list of questions as a starter. I would appreciate it a lot if you could share rational and honest opinions.

1. In your own word, how would you define racism and racial discrimination?

Racism is a primitive form of collectivism. It is the belief that the thoughts and attitudes of a person are the result of their lineage rather then a result of their culture and experiences. Racism is the concept that the thoughts, actions and attitudes of people are passed through birth to successive generations.

Racial discrimination is the treatment of people based on the belief that race dictates who that person is.

2. Do you agree or disagree that racial discrimination is among the top three most serious social problems nowadays in America?

Disagree, though there are forces at work increasing the the instances and severity of racism. Over the last 8 years, racism has grown exponentially in this country.

3. Do you agree or disagree that more laws and regulations should be enacted to protect people from racial discrimination?

Disagree.

Racism cannot be solved by edicts from rulers. It is a cultural, not a legal problem.

I don't agree with the whole Obama made racism worse argument. Sometimes when you bring issues to the surface they ignite. One could say that slavery wasn't a problem until the revolt and civil war. So did Lincoln make slavery worse? When you want to instigate change it results in debate and pushback so there is always an illusion of digression through the process of progression.

I agree that there is no need for more laws/regulations, however, I don't agree that "racism can't be solved by edicts from rulers" as you say, the laws that were put on the books during the civil rights movement helped carve a path towards massive progression, i don't see how you can deny that.

"Massive Progression"? Give some examples.
MLK's work was destroyed by the likes of Farrakhan and Sharpton and Jackson to name a few and all the other 'race whores'.

Give examples about progress that has been made since MLK? Do I really need to? How about you call our president and ask him. Wow, you are clueless

 

[Timmy]

Some businesses hire negroes so the business can fill it's 'AA' quota in so doing the business can apply for gov. tax breaks.
The businesses all know the negro won't be on the job for long for a variety of reasons.

What really happens is that business just hires friends n family of those who work their . Suddenly the place is all white ?!

This "most qualified " line is kinda bullshit because almost no one is ever hired on strict objective criteria only . Why do people get interviewed ? Why not just hire people on resumes alone ? Because that would be crazy .

So when totally subjective criteria pollutes the job hiring process , you are open up to systemic racism to creep in.

 

[Norman]

AA is bullsh#t. Higher education should be based on ethics/ability and merit NOT color.

If someone makes the following argument:

Certain group of people, e.g. the black, suffer from significantly lower level of education in an average sense. Consequently, they tend to be less successful and cause serious problems (e.g. crimes). If left unattended, the vicious cycle would continue and the situation get worse over time. Therefore, something has to be done to break such cycle. The most effective way of doing it is through better education, which cannot be offered to them if the criteria is solely merit-based.

Why is he wrong?

Tell you what YOU compare the Asian culture to the Negro here in America directly. Who is farther ahead? Asians.
Which is the less violent culture? Asians.
Who has better family structure? Asians.
Who has made more economic gains? Asians.

Who has been here longer? Negros.
Who has more AA? Negros.
What group has shown no willingness to educate themselves? Negros

So you tell me is your future and your countries future better spent and invested in which group?

If "Negros" as you say, are the problem then that is the group that needs the focused attention. The answer is better education and more support, resources, and opportunity. If you feel that they are the anchor slowing down the ship then why focus on making a better sail? Focus on pulling up the anchor and you are going to have a much better ride.

Negroes are not any sort of 'anchor slowing down the ship'. They have basically become irrelevant to the US economy as far as what they contribute.
The 'ship' has left the harbor without them already.
Sure we have to 'pretend' to be interested in holding their hands from cradle to grave.
The negro race has a general IQ in the low eighties living in a country of people with an IQ generally between 110-115.
Do the fucking math!

I couldnt care less about what some shitty poll says about IQs, only an idiot would believe that it's even possible to get this data... And even if it is true... So fucking what??? What's your point? Blacks are dumb so they shouldn't go to school? I feel stupider after reading you dumbshit posts, what should we do with idiots like you?

Erm, it is possible to get this data. And the data exists.

Multiple sources confirm the same or similar result, even controlling for other related factors.

Why is this data relevant? Because the regressives always claim that blacks earn less because of racism, and therefore white men are evil bigots that need to be deprived of their income. Mainly for that reason...

 

[DarkFury]

AA is bullsh#t. Higher education should be based on ethics/ability and merit NOT color.

If someone makes the following argument:

Certain group of people, e.g. the black, suffer from significantly lower level of education in an average sense. Consequently, they tend to be less successful and cause serious problems (e.g. crimes). If left unattended, the vicious cycle would continue and the situation get worse over time. Therefore, something has to be done to break such cycle. The most effective way of doing it is through better education, which cannot be offered to them if the criteria is solely merit-based.

Why is he wrong?

Tell you what YOU compare the Asian culture to the Negro here in America directly. Who is farther ahead? Asians.
Which is the less violent culture? Asians.
Who has better family structure? Asians.
Who has made more economic gains? Asians.

Who has been here longer? Negros.
Who has more AA? Negros.
What group has shown no willingness to educate themselves? Negros

So you tell me is your future and your countries future better spent and invested in which group?

If "Negros" as you say, are the problem then that is the group that needs the focused attention. The answer is better education and more support, resources, and opportunity. If you feel that they are the anchor slowing down the ship then why focus on making a better sail? Focus on pulling up the anchor and you are going to have a much better ride.

Negroes are not any sort of 'anchor slowing down the ship'. They have basically become irrelevant to the US economy as far as what they contribute.
The 'ship' has left the harbor without them already.
Sure we have to 'pretend' to be interested in holding their hands from cradle to grave.
The negro race has a general IQ in the low eighties living in a country of people with an IQ generally between 110-115.
Do the fucking math!

I couldnt care less about what some shitty poll says about IQs, only an idiot would believe that it's even possible to get this data... And even if it is true... So fucking what??? What's your point? Blacks are dumb so they shouldn't go to school? I feel stupider after reading you dumbshit posts, what should we do with idiots like you?

Its not impossible, you can get it in minutes...

""Among white Americans, the average IQ, as of a decade or so ago, was 103. Among Asian-Americans, it was 106. Among Jewish Americans, it was 113. Among Latino Americans, it was 89. Among African-Americans, it was 85. Around the world, studies find the same general pattern: whites 100, East Asians 106, sub-Sarahan Africans 70. One IQ table shows 113 in Hong Kong, 110 in Japan, and 100 in Britain. White populations in Australia, Canada, Europe, New Zealand, South Africa, and the United States score closer to one another than to the worldwide black average. It's been that way for at least a century."
Race, Genes, Intelligence - Facts Are Facts

 

[dannyboys]

AA is bullsh#t. Higher education should be based on ethics/ability and merit NOT color.

If someone makes the following argument:

Certain group of people, e.g. the black, suffer from significantly lower level of education in an average sense. Consequently, they tend to be less successful and cause serious problems (e.g. crimes). If left unattended, the vicious cycle would continue and the situation get worse over time. Therefore, something has to be done to break such cycle. The most effective way of doing it is through better education, which cannot be offered to them if the criteria is solely merit-based.

Why is he wrong?

Tell you what YOU compare the Asian culture to the Negro here in America directly. Who is farther ahead? Asians.
Which is the less violent culture? Asians.
Who has better family structure? Asians.
Who has made more economic gains? Asians.

Who has been here longer? Negros.
Who has more AA? Negros.
What group has shown no willingness to educate themselves? Negros

So you tell me is your future and your countries future better spent and invested in which group?

If "Negros" as you say, are the problem then that is the group that needs the focused attention. The answer is better education and more support, resources, and opportunity. If you feel that they are the anchor slowing down the ship then why focus on making a better sail? Focus on pulling up the anchor and you are going to have a much better ride.

Negroes are not any sort of 'anchor slowing down the ship'. They have basically become irrelevant to the US economy as far as what they contribute.
The 'ship' has left the harbor without them already.
Sure we have to 'pretend' to be interested in holding their hands from cradle to grave.
The negro race has a general IQ in the low eighties living in a country of people with an IQ generally between 110-115.
Do the fucking math!

I couldnt care less about what some shitty poll says about IQs, only an idiot would believe that it's even possible to get this data... And even if it is true... So fucking what??? What's your point? Blacks are dumb so they shouldn't go to school? I feel stupider after reading you dumbshit posts, what should we do with idiots like you?

So you believe the scientific data collected for decades by 100% neutral scientists is simply a "shitty poll"?
Oh dear.
Inner city schools predominantly negro have long ago 'dumbed-down' the basic curriculum in a vain effort to teach negroes the very simple basic three 'Rs'.
It hasn't worked.
Maybe if the 'Makers' threw another TRILLION dollars at the problem then negroes would be able to actually sit still at their school desks long enough so they can learn the difference between what right and left mean.

 

[Slade3200]

If someone makes the following argument:

Certain group of people, e.g. the black, suffer from significantly lower level of education in an average sense. Consequently, they tend to be less successful and cause serious problems (e.g. crimes). If left unattended, the vicious cycle would continue and the situation get worse over time. Therefore, something has to be done to break such cycle. The most effective way of doing it is through better education, which cannot be offered to them if the criteria is solely merit-based.

Why is he wrong?

Tell you what YOU compare the Asian culture to the Negro here in America directly. Who is farther ahead? Asians.
Which is the less violent culture? Asians.
Who has better family structure? Asians.
Who has made more economic gains? Asians.

Who has been here longer? Negros.
Who has more AA? Negros.
What group has shown no willingness to educate themselves? Negros

So you tell me is your future and your countries future better spent and invested in which group?

If "Negros" as you say, are the problem then that is the group that needs the focused attention. The answer is better education and more support, resources, and opportunity. If you feel that they are the anchor slowing down the ship then why focus on making a better sail? Focus on pulling up the anchor and you are going to have a much better ride.

Negroes are not any sort of 'anchor slowing down the ship'. They have basically become irrelevant to the US economy as far as what they contribute.
The 'ship' has left the harbor without them already.
Sure we have to 'pretend' to be interested in holding their hands from cradle to grave.
The negro race has a general IQ in the low eighties living in a country of people with an IQ generally between 110-115.
Do the fucking math!

I couldnt care less about what some shitty poll says about IQs, only an idiot would believe that it's even possible to get this data... And even if it is true... So fucking what??? What's your point? Blacks are dumb so they shouldn't go to school? I feel stupider after reading you dumbshit posts, what should we do with idiots like you?

Erm, it is possible to get this data. And the data exists.

Multiple sources confirm the same or similar result, even controlling for other related factors.

Why is this data relevant? Because the regressives always claim that blacks earn less because of racism, and therefore white men are evil bigots that need to be deprived of their income. Mainly for that reason...

I don't support the argument that compares wages to racism. That's a cheat shot and doesn't consider many factors... on the flip side your IQ response is a low blow and insulting. It doesn't progress your agrumemt and just makes you look like a bully. You can be smarter and more tactful if you want to be more effective with your arguments.

 

[Norman]

Tell you what YOU compare the Asian culture to the Negro here in America directly. Who is farther ahead? Asians.
Which is the less violent culture? Asians.
Who has better family structure? Asians.
Who has made more economic gains? Asians.

Who has been here longer? Negros.
Who has more AA? Negros.
What group has shown no willingness to educate themselves? Negros

So you tell me is your future and your countries future better spent and invested in which group?

If "Negros" as you say, are the problem then that is the group that needs the focused attention. The answer is better education and more support, resources, and opportunity. If you feel that they are the anchor slowing down the ship then why focus on making a better sail? Focus on pulling up the anchor and you are going to have a much better ride.

Negroes are not any sort of 'anchor slowing down the ship'. They have basically become irrelevant to the US economy as far as what they contribute.
The 'ship' has left the harbor without them already.
Sure we have to 'pretend' to be interested in holding their hands from cradle to grave.
The negro race has a general IQ in the low eighties living in a country of people with an IQ generally between 110-115.
Do the fucking math!

I couldnt care less about what some shitty poll says about IQs, only an idiot would believe that it's even possible to get this data... And even if it is true... So fucking what??? What's your point? Blacks are dumb so they shouldn't go to school? I feel stupider after reading you dumbshit posts, what should we do with idiots like you?

Erm, it is possible to get this data. And the data exists.

Multiple sources confirm the same or similar result, even controlling for other related factors.

Why is this data relevant? Because the regressives always claim that blacks earn less because of racism, and therefore white men are evil bigots that need to be deprived of their income. Mainly for that reason...

I don't support the argument that compares wages to racism. That's a cheat shot and doesn't consider many factors... on the flip side your IQ response is a low blow and insulting. It doesn't progress your agrumemt and just makes you look like a bully. You can be smarter and more tactful if you want to be more effective with your arguments.

So which part of the fact that races have different average IQs do you disagree with (my factual argument)? Where is your proof?

How is admitting a fact insulting? Do you live in a liberal regressive lala land?