Oh, Those Amusing Democrats

[Billy_Kinetta]

Never a dull moment.

What is happening: 2 mayors arrested in separate sex-for-meth, strip-poker-with-minor stings

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Anthony Silva is a Republican, clown.

 

[norwegen]

Never a dull Moment? Have you ever heard one of their speeches?

As for the perps, well of course they're "absolutely innocent . . . these are false charges that are done at the midnight hour of a campaign."

I mean, evidence, schmevidence.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Anthony Silva is a Republican, clown.

Ahhh, my mistake.

Many "Republicans" these days are actually Democrats, so it's an easy mistake.

 

[Montrovant]

Anthony Silva is a Republican, clown.

And /thread

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Anthony Silva is a Republican, clown.

Ahhh, my mistake.

Many Republicans these days are actually Democrats, so it's an easy mistake.

Of course, a "no true scotsman" fallacy.


You guys are too predictable.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Anthony Silva is a Republican, clown.

Ahhh, my mistake.

Many Republicans these days are actually Democrats, so it's an easy mistake.

Of course, a "no true scotsman" fallacy.


You guys are too predictable.

Facts are always predictable.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Anthony Silva is a Republican, clown.

Ahhh, my mistake.

Many Republicans these days are actually Democrats, so it's an easy mistake.

Of course, a "no true scotsman" fallacy.


You guys are too predictable.

Facts are always predictable.

You mean like the "fact" that you've made a complete fool of yourself in this thread, and are now frantically trying to save face?

Yep, very predictable.

 

[Confounding]

You mean like the "fact" that you've made a complete fool of yourself in this thread, and are now frantically trying to save face?

Yep, very predictable.

Bully.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Anthony Silva is a Republican, clown.

Ahhh, my mistake.

Many Republicans these days are actually Democrats, so it's an easy mistake.

Of course, a "no true scotsman" fallacy.


You guys are too predictable.

Facts are always predictable.

You mean like the "fact" that you've made a complete fool of yourself in this thread, and are now frantically trying to save face?

Yep, very predictable.

You seem to care too much.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Anthony Silva is a Republican, clown.

Ahhh, my mistake.

Many Republicans these days are actually Democrats, so it's an easy mistake.

Of course, a "no true scotsman" fallacy.


You guys are too predictable.

Facts are always predictable.

You mean like the "fact" that you've made a complete fool of yourself in this thread, and are now frantically trying to save face?

Yep, very predictable.

You seem to care too much.

Keep trying, I'm sure you'll come up with something that will somehow erase your failure of an OP.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

You mean like the "fact" that you've made a complete fool of yourself in this thread, and are now frantically trying to save face?

Yep, very predictable.

Bully.

It's "bullying" to point out the utter failure of a troll OP?

Do you need a safe space to work out your feelings?

 

[Confounding]

It's "bullying" to point out the utter failure of a troll OP?

Do you need a safe space to work out your feelings?

Your point was made after the first post. You persisted in an attempt to humiliate the OP.

Bully.

 

[idb]

Anthony Silva is a Republican, clown.

Ahhh, my mistake.

Many Republicans these days are actually Democrats, so it's an easy mistake.

Of course, a "no true scotsman" fallacy.


You guys are too predictable.

Facts are always predictable.

You mean like the "fact" that you've made a complete fool of yourself in this thread, and are now frantically trying to save face?

Yep, very predictable.

More proof that facts have a liberal bias.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

It's "bullying" to point out the utter failure of a troll OP?

Do you need a safe space to work out your feelings?

Your point was made after the first post. You persisted in an attempt to humiliate the OP.

Bully.

Of course I humiliated the OP - since the OP's intention was to humiliate his political opponents, and he failed spectacularly.

If that upsets your sensitivities, I don't really know what to tell you.

 

[Confounding]

Of course I humiliated the OP - since the OP's intention was to humiliate his political opponents, and he failed spectacularly.

If that upsets your sensitivities, I don't really know what to tell you.

I'm not upset by your bullying. I just observe and speak the truth.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Of course I humiliated the OP - since the OP's intention was to humiliate his political opponents, and he failed spectacularly.

If that upsets your sensitivities, I don't really know what to tell you.

I'm not upset by your bullying. I just observe and speak the truth.

No, what you do is try to beat people down with your pseudo-moralizations, like the "social justice warriors" I always hear about. If you spoke the "truth", you'd feel no need to jump to defense of a troll just because he's on your "team".

If the OP had responded politely and corrected his mistake, I wouldn't have continued this conversation - but he chose to be an ass, so I responded in kind.

Same with you - your fake moralization and pearl-clutching is no better than what you call my "bullying" - at least I'm not lying to myself, or anyone else.

 

[Confounding]

No, what you do is try to beat people down with your pseudo-moralizations, like the "social justice warriors" I always hear about. If you spoke the "truth", you'd feel no need to jump to defense of a troll just because he's on your "team".

I assure you I'm not on his team. I jumped to his defense because you had obviously won the engagement and then proceeded to do the text version of Halo t-bagging.



I wouldn't normally defend somebody like that, but I thought better of you than that. You're a smart guy; act like it.

 

[Dale Smith]

Ahhh, my mistake.

Many Republicans these days are actually Democrats, so it's an easy mistake.

Of course, a "no true scotsman" fallacy.


You guys are too predictable.

Facts are always predictable.

You mean like the "fact" that you've made a complete fool of yourself in this thread, and are now frantically trying to save face?

Yep, very predictable.

You seem to care too much.

Keep trying, I'm sure you'll come up with something that will somehow erase your failure of an OP.

STFU, "doc".......I have so thoroughly kicked you ass in a debate that once you are proven wrong, you put up stupid emoticons because that's all you have. You are a joke. If someone as stupid as you can be a "moderator" on this forum, it tells me that the bar is low enough for a tortoise to hop over.

 

[Dale Smith]

Of course I humiliated the OP - since the OP's intention was to humiliate his political opponents, and he failed spectacularly.

If that upsets your sensitivities, I don't really know what to tell you.

I'm not upset by your bullying. I just observe and speak the truth.

No, what you do is try to beat people down with your pseudo-moralizations, like the "social justice warriors" I always hear about. If you spoke the "truth", you'd feel no need to jump to defense of a troll just because he's on your "team".

If the OP had responded politely and corrected his mistake, I wouldn't have continued this conversation - but he chose to be an ass, so I responded in kind.

Same with you - your fake moralization and pearl-clutching is no better than what you call my "bullying" - at least I'm not lying to myself, or anyone else.

Yeah, you just bail on a thread when I kick your ass......