C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
Trump has only himself to blame, he’s his own worst enemy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump has only himself to blame, he’s his own worst enemy.
‘Monica’ has nothing to do with Clinton or her running for president; what Bill Clinton may have done has no bearing on Clinton’s becoming president – Bill Clinton isn’t ‘running’ for anything – there is no such ‘attack’ to be made on Clinton.man, i hope he hits her hard on monica. gloves off, she's just plain nasty.
Everyone, do not be distracted, the SCOTUS is the only important issue.
Famous last words...
What does that even mean?
Everyone, do not be distracted, the SCOTUS is the only important issue.
Famous last words...
What does that even mean?
"Famous last words" is a figure of speech which refers to decisions that may be common, even popular, but entail a high degree of risk or indicate and over fixation on partial data while ignoring the big picture. While related to the phenomenon of misaligned priorities "famous last words" differs in that even when correct prioritization has been assessed, a person may still over fixate on a superior priority, thus giving to too much weight within the decision making process. Example:
You should have folded those cards
But they were suited.
Famous last words.
Don't go home with her, she's married and her husband is crazy.
Yeah, but she's hot and she's horny.
Famous last words.
I hope that's cleared things up for you.
Of all the issues out there and all the issues with Trump the ONE issue that gets my vote is SCOTUS nominations.
Your definition means nothing. The scientific no-junk polling demonstrated that educated white women generally think poorly of the old model of white male dominated governance. While they are certainly ladies, you are no gentleman.Once again Jake, I draw a marked distinction between women and the term "ladies". I do realize that within the circle in which you are included there are no "ladies".In the news
View attachment 91747
After debate, women think less of Trump and better of Clinton
NBCNews.com - 2 days ago
Donald Trump has said, "I would be the best for women." But according to a new NBC ...
White House Watch
Rasmussen Reports - 2 days ago
Fox News Poll: Clinton ahead of Trump after debate, fear motivating both sides
Fox News - 20 hours ago
--------------------------
The impact of education and gender is magnified when looking at the two key groups of whites, non-college white men and college-educated white women. Among white women with a four-year degree, 46 percent say whites have too much influence. Among non-college white men, just 21 percent agree. Similarly, while 53 percent of college-educated white women think men have too much influence, only 28 percent of non-college white men feel the same. http://www.langerresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/1182a2Groupinfluence.pdf
Once again Jake, I draw a marked distinction between women and the term "ladies". I do realize that within the circle in which you are included there are no "ladies".
Here's one of your right wing "ladies".....Enjoy......
![]()
Because I don't subscribe to the corruption of Hillary Clinton being at the helm of my government. Should she win, she will become the first president in history to have 5 members of her inner circle ask for and receive immunity from prosecution by the FBI. What a freaking testimony.
Cheryl Mills has ALREADY been given immunity by the FBI for her testimony and it yielded zilch....
The rest of the above post you got form that amazing Sean Hannity. LOL
HIllary has a "cogent strategy?" What is that, tax and spend, free stuff, green energy?But not saying anything worth a damn. Trump's a loser with no cogent strategy. Slinging mud with Hillary isn't going to get him anything but a dirty $10,000 suit.Yeah, I am talking, douche bag.Look who's talking!You spew shit every time you post.
So, it's mature when Hillary dishes it out, but "childish" when Trump retaliates? Just admit your a HIllary drone."rehashing it?" Defending himself is some kind of crime now?
This is not a policy issue. It is a childish game.
The skin on this guy is incredibly thin.
You're repeating talking points dispensed by the Clinton campaign. All you douche bags start yapping about the same thing on queue. Do you imagine nobody notices what a bunch of programed robots you are?You're the one repeating stuff you heard. I'm repeating stuff I said. Please try and keep up. You're not making Trump supporters look good and making Hillary's "deplorables" comment look better and betterRepeating stuff you hear is all you're capable of.Hate to repeat myself, but sucks to be Trump!So, something Trump said 25 years ago is a reason not to vote for him? But we should vote for Hillary after she committing numerous felonies and got 4 Americans killed/ HIllary won't even release her Wall Street speeches. Celebrity biographer Jerry Oppenheimer reported that the night Bill unexpectedly lost his 1974 Arkansas congressional seat bid, Hillary shrieked at his campaign manager, “you ******* Jew bastard.” Hillary is notorious for using the F-word and cussing out her subordinates.
So, something Trump said 25 years ago is a reason not to vote for him? But we should vote for Hillary after she committing numerous felonies and got 4 Americans killed?
HIllary won't even release her Wall Street speeches.
Celebrity biographer Jerry Oppenheimer reported that the night Bill unexpectedly lost his 1974 Arkansas congressional seat bid, Hillary shrieked at his campaign manager, “you ******* Jew bastard.”
So, moron, first you "defend" something because it was stated 25 years ago.....
...and then you attack something that was stated 42 years ago??????
(Just to help you a bit, nitwit.......42 years ago is LONGER than 25 years ago.....LOL)
So, it's mature when Hillary dishes it out, but "childish" when Trump retaliates?
Just admit your a HIllary drone.

Monica’ has nothing to do with Clinton or her running for president.‘Monica’ has nothing to do with Clinton or her running for president; what Bill Clinton may have done has no bearing on Clinton’s becoming president – Bill Clinton isn’t ‘running’ for anything – there is no such ‘attack’ to be made on Clinton.man, i hope he hits her hard on monica. gloves off, she's just plain nasty.
Indeed, if Trump were to make such an ‘attack,’ it would clearly backfire, benefiting only Clinton.
That you and other conservatives are so devoid of political acumen explains why you’re about to lose your third presidential election on a row.
Cheryl Mills is one of Hillary's inner 5 granted immunity. Her testimony yielded "zilch" because she knew she could lie with impunity. She and all the rest of Hillary's corrupt gang knew Comey had no intention of prosecuting Hillary.Because I don't subscribe to the corruption of Hillary Clinton being at the helm of my government. Should she win, she will become the first president in history to have 5 members of her inner circle ask for and receive immunity from prosecution by the FBI. What a freaking testimony.
Cheryl Mills has ALREADY been given immunity by the FBI for her testimony and it yielded zilch....
The rest of the above post you got form that amazing Sean Hannity. LOL