Right wingers insist that it's not possible that only 6% of scientists are "Republican".
The reasons:
1. blah...blah...blah.
So the scientific source for your 6% number is....invented in your brain?
Not very suprising.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Right wingers insist that it's not possible that only 6% of scientists are "Republican".
The reasons:
1. blah...blah...blah.
Right wingers insist that it's not possible that only 6% of scientists are "Republican".
The reasons:
1. blah...blah...blah.
So the scientific source for your 6% number is....invented in your brain?
Not very suprising.
Instead of insulting why not go get the numbers and prove him wrong?
Rdean's problem is that he cannot comprehend really basic stuff like.... science is apolitical. No scientist should be so ingrained in any political view that he allows those opinions (because that's what politics is... opinion) to influence the results of any scientific study.
By the evidence provided by rdean, research suggests that he is a partisan hack who is absolutely clueless about science.
Instead of insulting why not go get the numbers and prove him wrong?
He came up with the number. He is obliged to support the assertion.
Its the right who seek out the few scientists who are paid to talk crap about GW and claim they are right over the vast majority of the scientific community.
Its the right who USE science.
How funny you dont see that CG
Right wingers insist that it's not possible that only 6% of scientists are "Republican".
The reasons:
1. blah...blah...blah.
So the scientific source for your 6% number is....invented in your brain?
Not very suprising.
Yea, prove me wrong.
You can start here:
Its the right who seek out the few scientists who are paid to talk crap about GW and claim they are right over the vast majority of the scientific community.
Its the right who USE science.
How funny you dont see that CG
Both sides USE science, you total moron. Science is beyond political views and should not be influenced by politics. It's the left with their use of GW to promote political agendas that I object to, not the science. Of course, one does need to have some political and scientific integrity to understand that. Since you - and rdean - lack both, I do not expect you to understand it.
Its the right who seek out the few scientists who are paid to talk crap about GW and claim they are right over the vast majority of the scientific community.
Its the right who USE science.
How funny you dont see that CG
Both sides USE science, you total moron. Science is beyond political views and should not be influenced by politics. It's the left with their use of GW to promote political agendas that I object to, not the science. Of course, one does need to have some political and scientific integrity to understand that. Since you - and rdean - lack both, I do not expect you to understand it.
You are right to a point, the left uses real science to guide their decisions and the right uses fringe science to hang onto their failed ideas.
I dont mind using real science to make decisions, in fact that is the smart thing to do.
Using fringe science to battle REAL science for political purposses is what the right does.
When you try to pretend that fringe science is more dependable than what the majority of people in the scientific field think then you are using science for political purposes.