Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 119,336
- 3,635
LOLOLWrong. The article says the wall samples were "vulnerable to breaching." It doesn't say how it was done.LOLOLThis is what youâll have for $6 billion...It looks like the rats are bailing on the Piglosi/Schumer sinking ship:
Congressional Democrats are ditching House Speaker Nancy Pelosiâs and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumerâs ardent opposition to any barrier or wall along the U.S. border with Mexico, as the partial government shutdown continues and President Donald Trump takes his case directly to the border itself.
ââIf we have a partial wall, if we have fencing, if we have technology used to keep our border safe, all of that is fine,â Rep. Cheri Bustos (D-IL), the chairwoman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), said on CNN.
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) also backed a barrier along the U.S. border with Mexico.
âSome fencing is useful, some barriers are useful,â Merkley said. âThereâs a lot of surveillance technology. Iâve been to some cities on the border that have triple fencing and have more personnel and have the technology to see the people moving in the middle of the night.â
These very prominent congressional Democratsâ message on the effectiveness of a wall or barrier or fence is very different from the coordinated message from Schumer and Pelosi just two nights ago when the two Democrat leaders in Congress said in their response to President Trumpâs Oval Office address that the wall would be âineffective.â
Pelosi called the wall âexpensive and ineffective,â something that was an âobsessionâ of Trumpâsâwhile Schumer bashed Trumpâs âineffective, unnecessary border wallâ and said that America does not need a barrier on the border for security. âWe can secure our border without an expensive, ineffective wall,â Schumer said in his response to Trump.
It remains to be seen where this fight goes from here, but the fact that many Democrats are messaging in a very different way from Pelosi and Schumer is particularly interesting as the next stages of this battle
They are realizing that the gruesome twosome are backing a losing cause. And being politicians they want on the winning side which ain't the gruesome twosomes.
Trumps speech hit on every point I hoped he would make. Illegal that cost the tax payers billions each year and the drugs that come across the border.
The rebuttal was lame and you can bet the voters picked up on that big time.
We will have that wall.
![]()
Nope. We save billions that illegals cost us every year.
Dumbfuck, that picture is what trumpâs wall looks like now. It took no time for someone to cut through it was an ordinary saw.
Itâs not gonna save us a dime and Mexico isnât gonna pay for it; we are.
******* moron... âPrototype of Trumpâs Wall Proves No Match for Sawâ
Do you ever say anything that isnât ******* moronic?
Ever???
Last edited: