Official Thread for Denial of GreenHouse Effect and Radiative Physics.

[jc456]

That isn't what it says at all...none of you guys seem to be able to read a simple equation...guess that is why you are dupes...

That isn't what it says at all..

That formula shows net power.
Because the object and the background both radiate.

Still no backup for your magical "zero radiating at equilibrium"? Weird.

Prove it!
SB is about power radiated where does it state ‘net’?

SB is about power radiated

Yup. That's why your claim about ice not radiating is so silly.

where does it state ‘net’?

^
Here

Where? I see nothing that says net.

Because you're stupid.

how so? you said it says net, I don't see the word anywhere near that equation. And if SB then the P = emissions of an object

"Stefan–Boltzmann law
Description
The Stefan–Boltzmann law describes the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature. Wikipedia"

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

That isn't what it says at all..

That formula shows net power.
Because the object and the background both radiate.

Still no backup for your magical "zero radiating at equilibrium"? Weird.

Prove it!
SB is about power radiated where does it state ‘net’?

SB is about power radiated

Yup. That's why your claim about ice not radiating is so silly.

where does it state ‘net’?

^
Here

Where? I see nothing that says net.

Because you're stupid.

how so? you said it says net, I don't see the word anywhere near that equation. And if SB then the P = emissions of an object

"Stefan–Boltzmann law
Description
The Stefan–Boltzmann law describes the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature. Wikipedia"

the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature

Exactly! No mention of a dimmer switch.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

That isn't what it says at all..

That formula shows net power.
Because the object and the background both radiate.

Still no backup for your magical "zero radiating at equilibrium"? Weird.

Prove it!
SB is about power radiated where does it state ‘net’?

SB is about power radiated

Yup. That's why your claim about ice not radiating is so silly.

where does it state ‘net’?

^
Here

Where? I see nothing that says net.

Because you're stupid.

how so? you said it says net, I don't see the word anywhere near that equation. And if SB then the P = emissions of an object

"Stefan–Boltzmann law
Description
The Stefan–Boltzmann law describes the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature. Wikipedia"

you said it says net, I don't see the word anywhere near that equation.

^
This equation isn't in your link.

 

[jc456]

Prove it!
SB is about power radiated where does it state ‘net’?

SB is about power radiated

Yup. That's why your claim about ice not radiating is so silly.

where does it state ‘net’?

^
Here

Where? I see nothing that says net.

Because you're stupid.

how so? you said it says net, I don't see the word anywhere near that equation. And if SB then the P = emissions of an object

"Stefan–Boltzmann law
Description
The Stefan–Boltzmann law describes the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature. Wikipedia"

the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature

Exactly! No mention of a dimmer switch.

Nothing about net

 

[jc456]

Prove it!
SB is about power radiated where does it state ‘net’?

SB is about power radiated

Yup. That's why your claim about ice not radiating is so silly.

where does it state ‘net’?

^
Here

Where? I see nothing that says net.

Because you're stupid.

how so? you said it says net, I don't see the word anywhere near that equation. And if SB then the P = emissions of an object

"Stefan–Boltzmann law
Description
The Stefan–Boltzmann law describes the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature. Wikipedia"

you said it says net, I don't see the word anywhere near that equation.

View attachment 273104

^
This equation isn't in your link.

Right? I gave you the definition

BTW, I’m still waiting on that observed heat off an ice cube near a hot object? Another thing when an object radiates it gets colder right? Why does the ice melt when near a hot object if it’s releasing heat as you say?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

SB is about power radiated

Yup. That's why your claim about ice not radiating is so silly.

where does it state ‘net’?

^
Here

Where? I see nothing that says net.

Because you're stupid.

how so? you said it says net, I don't see the word anywhere near that equation. And if SB then the P = emissions of an object

"Stefan–Boltzmann law
Description
The Stefan–Boltzmann law describes the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature. Wikipedia"

the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature

Exactly! No mention of a dimmer switch.

Nothing about net

Because it's only talking about radiating, silly.

So you'll be posting your evidence that SB is flawed any time now?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

SB is about power radiated

Yup. That's why your claim about ice not radiating is so silly.

where does it state ‘net’?

^
Here

Where? I see nothing that says net.

Because you're stupid.

how so? you said it says net, I don't see the word anywhere near that equation. And if SB then the P = emissions of an object

"Stefan–Boltzmann law
Description
The Stefan–Boltzmann law describes the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature. Wikipedia"

you said it says net, I don't see the word anywhere near that equation.

View attachment 273104

^
This equation isn't in your link.

Right? I gave you the definition

BTW, I’m still waiting on that observed heat off an ice cube near a hot object? Another thing when an object radiates it gets colder right? Why does the ice melt when near a hot object if it’s releasing heat as you say?

Right? I gave you the definition

Right, I saw your confusion.

BTW, I’m still waiting on that observed heat off an ice cube near a hot object?

You could use one of these cameras. FLIR T660...….

Another thing when an object radiates it gets colder right?

Depends.

Why does the ice melt when near a hot object if it’s releasing heat as you say?

Why wouldn't it?

Is your confusion caused by your weak math skills?

 

[jc456]

Where? I see nothing that says net.

Because you're stupid.

how so? you said it says net, I don't see the word anywhere near that equation. And if SB then the P = emissions of an object

"Stefan–Boltzmann law
Description
The Stefan–Boltzmann law describes the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature. Wikipedia"

the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature

Exactly! No mention of a dimmer switch.

Nothing about net

Because it's only talking about radiating, silly.

So you'll be posting your evidence that SB is flawed any time now?

How did I say it was wrong?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Because you're stupid.

how so? you said it says net, I don't see the word anywhere near that equation. And if SB then the P = emissions of an object

"Stefan–Boltzmann law
Description
The Stefan–Boltzmann law describes the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature. Wikipedia"

the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature

Exactly! No mention of a dimmer switch.

Nothing about net

Because it's only talking about radiating, silly.

So you'll be posting your evidence that SB is flawed any time now?

How did I say it was wrong?

None of your whining on this thread was you claiming the SB was flawed?

That's a relief.

 

[jc456]

Where? I see nothing that says net.

Because you're stupid.

how so? you said it says net, I don't see the word anywhere near that equation. And if SB then the P = emissions of an object

"Stefan–Boltzmann law
Description
The Stefan–Boltzmann law describes the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature. Wikipedia"

you said it says net, I don't see the word anywhere near that equation.

View attachment 273104

^
This equation isn't in your link.

Right? I gave you the definition

BTW, I’m still waiting on that observed heat off an ice cube near a hot object? Another thing when an object radiates it gets colder right? Why does the ice melt when near a hot object if it’s releasing heat as you say?

Right? I gave you the definition

Right, I saw your confusion.

BTW, I’m still waiting on that observed heat off an ice cube near a hot object?

You could use one of these cameras. FLIR T660...….

View attachment 273113

Another thing when an object radiates it gets colder right?

Depends.

Why does the ice melt when near a hot object if it’s releasing heat as you say?

Why wouldn't it?

Is your confusion caused by your weak math skills?

So you’re saying that when an object radiates it' gets warmer? Hmm you got a new one to get your Nobel prize with. Magic photons dimmer switches? Hahaha hahaha

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Because you're stupid.

how so? you said it says net, I don't see the word anywhere near that equation. And if SB then the P = emissions of an object

"Stefan–Boltzmann law
Description
The Stefan–Boltzmann law describes the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature. Wikipedia"

you said it says net, I don't see the word anywhere near that equation.

View attachment 273104

^
This equation isn't in your link.

Right? I gave you the definition

BTW, I’m still waiting on that observed heat off an ice cube near a hot object? Another thing when an object radiates it gets colder right? Why does the ice melt when near a hot object if it’s releasing heat as you say?

Right? I gave you the definition

Right, I saw your confusion.

BTW, I’m still waiting on that observed heat off an ice cube near a hot object?

You could use one of these cameras. FLIR T660...….

View attachment 273113

Another thing when an object radiates it gets colder right?

Depends.

Why does the ice melt when near a hot object if it’s releasing heat as you say?

Why wouldn't it?

Is your confusion caused by your weak math skills?

So you’re saying that when an object radiates it' gets warmer? Hmm you got a new one to get your Nobel prize with. Magic photons dimmer switches? Hahaha hahaha

So you’re saying that when an object radiates it' gets warmer?

Does it?

Hmm you got a new one to get your Nobel prize with.

You first with your "The 2nd Law conflicts with SB" Nobel.

 

[jc456]

how so? you said it says net, I don't see the word anywhere near that equation. And if SB then the P = emissions of an object

"Stefan–Boltzmann law
Description
The Stefan–Boltzmann law describes the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature. Wikipedia"

the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature

Exactly! No mention of a dimmer switch.

Nothing about net

Because it's only talking about radiating, silly.

So you'll be posting your evidence that SB is flawed any time now?

How did I say it was wrong?

None of your whining on this thread was you claiming the SB was flawed?

That's a relief.

I said cold objects don’t radiate when next to warmer objects. You said they do. I said nothing more. You think SB shows otherwise, fill in the formula and prove the equation will show the cold object radiates. Go!

 

[jc456]

If you can manage some basic math set T to the same number as Tc...how much energy (P) does the equation say is being emitted?

how much energy (P) does the equation say is being emitted?

It says the same amount is being emitted as absorbed.

Where?

Where your moron buddy said P = zero.

Zero radiated yep again it’s radiating nothing yep. What we both say

View attachment 273102

Where did you see zero radiated in SB?

BTW, I see zero when T = Tc.

 

[jc456]

how so? you said it says net, I don't see the word anywhere near that equation. And if SB then the P = emissions of an object

"Stefan–Boltzmann law
Description
The Stefan–Boltzmann law describes the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature. Wikipedia"

you said it says net, I don't see the word anywhere near that equation.

View attachment 273104

^
This equation isn't in your link.

Right? I gave you the definition

BTW, I’m still waiting on that observed heat off an ice cube near a hot object? Another thing when an object radiates it gets colder right? Why does the ice melt when near a hot object if it’s releasing heat as you say?

Right? I gave you the definition

Right, I saw your confusion.

BTW, I’m still waiting on that observed heat off an ice cube near a hot object?

You could use one of these cameras. FLIR T660...….

View attachment 273113

Another thing when an object radiates it gets colder right?

Depends.

Why does the ice melt when near a hot object if it’s releasing heat as you say?

Why wouldn't it?

Is your confusion caused by your weak math skills?

So you’re saying that when an object radiates it' gets warmer? Hmm you got a new one to get your Nobel prize with. Magic photons dimmer switches? Hahaha hahaha

So you’re saying that when an object radiates it' gets warmer?

Does it?

Hmm you got a new one to get your Nobel prize with.

You first with your "The 2nd Law conflicts with SB" Nobel.

still waiting for your explanation, does an object cool or warm up as it radiates? you now have dodged yet another question. you're the dodge ball king I see.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature

Exactly! No mention of a dimmer switch.

Nothing about net

Because it's only talking about radiating, silly.

So you'll be posting your evidence that SB is flawed any time now?

How did I say it was wrong?

None of your whining on this thread was you claiming the SB was flawed?

That's a relief.

I said cold objects don’t radiate when next to warmer objects. You said they do. I said nothing more. You think SB shows otherwise, fill in the formula and prove the equation will show the cold object radiates. Go!

I said cold objects don’t radiate when next to warmer objects.

So you are disagreeing with SB. You should post your data. Maybe some sources that agree with you?

Unless you're out there all alone with your buddy?

You said they do.

Obviously, SB.

You think SB shows otherwise, fill in the formula and prove the equation will show the cold object radiates.



E=eA(5.670374419 × 10−8 watt per metre^2/K^4) * (273.15)^4

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

how much energy (P) does the equation say is being emitted?

It says the same amount is being emitted as absorbed.

Where?

Where your moron buddy said P = zero.

Zero radiated yep again it’s radiating nothing yep. What we both say

View attachment 273102

Where did you see zero radiated in SB?

BTW, I see zero when T = Tc.

Great, where did you see that in SB?

 

[Wuwei]

Photons that come from the Sun are the result of fusion.

Absolutely!

the source of the photons from the surface that radiate to the hotter corona is fusion.

You bet your ass.

is that what you're telling us?

That's what I'm telling you.

you wrote it, right?

Sure did.

Did you find out where fusion occurs?

Or will your ignorance on this topic remain unreduced?

The plethora of posts about fusion on the surface of the sun was a hilarious dialog. Too bad it ended. Teasing the hapless idiot like that was better than the famous Abbot and Costello, "Who's on first".

Also the ice cream "tutorial video" was hilarious. And SSDD coming back with his fake physics is hilarious. He never learns from the fact that he disagrees with himself in the most fundamental aspects of thermodynamics.This thread should be moved to the Humor forum.

.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

you said it says net, I don't see the word anywhere near that equation.

View attachment 273104

^
This equation isn't in your link.

Right? I gave you the definition

BTW, I’m still waiting on that observed heat off an ice cube near a hot object? Another thing when an object radiates it gets colder right? Why does the ice melt when near a hot object if it’s releasing heat as you say?

Right? I gave you the definition

Right, I saw your confusion.

BTW, I’m still waiting on that observed heat off an ice cube near a hot object?

You could use one of these cameras. FLIR T660...….

View attachment 273113

Another thing when an object radiates it gets colder right?

Depends.

Why does the ice melt when near a hot object if it’s releasing heat as you say?

Why wouldn't it?

Is your confusion caused by your weak math skills?

So you’re saying that when an object radiates it' gets warmer? Hmm you got a new one to get your Nobel prize with. Magic photons dimmer switches? Hahaha hahaha

So you’re saying that when an object radiates it' gets warmer?

Does it?

Hmm you got a new one to get your Nobel prize with.

You first with your "The 2nd Law conflicts with SB" Nobel.

still waiting for your explanation, does an object cool or warm up as it radiates? you now have dodged yet another question. you're the dodge ball king I see.

does an object cool or warm up as it radiates?

Did you miss my answer? Or did you forget already?

It depends.

you now have dodged yet another question.

I keep answering, your Alzheimer's keeps getting in your way.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Photons that come from the Sun are the result of fusion.

Absolutely!

the source of the photons from the surface that radiate to the hotter corona is fusion.

You bet your ass.

is that what you're telling us?

That's what I'm telling you.

you wrote it, right?

Sure did.

Did you find out where fusion occurs?

Or will your ignorance on this topic remain unreduced?

The plethora of posts about fusion on the surface of the sun was a hilarious dialog. Too bad it ended. Teasing the hapless idiot like that was better than the famous Abbot and Costello, "Who's on first".

Also the ice cream "tutorial video" was hilarious. And SSDD coming back with his fake physics is hilarious. He never learns from the fact that he disagrees with himself in the most fundamental aspects of thermodynamics.This thread should be moved to the Humor forum.

.

He's not very bright.
Perfect sycophant.

 

[Wuwei]

The SB equation describes one way energy flow from a radiator to a cooler background.

No it doesn't.

it says nothing about two way energy flow.

Yes it does.

.the onus is upon you guys to prove it wrong.

Already did.

.Set T to the same temperature as TC and P=zero...I have no problem with that.

Of course it's zero.

you on the other hand believe that it is wrong.

Nobody here does except JC

so prove it with some actual evidence.

Stefan already did.

.