Office of Special Counsel Launches Investigation Into Jack Smith

[Nostra]

Probably.

I’m sure you can quit/e dozens of your posts calling for Biden to be prosecuted, right?

Dodge incoming in 3….2……

 

[Nostra]

The cult programming is working perfectly!
Distracting the MAGAt cult with stories like this one keeps MAGAts from talking about Trump's connection to Epstein, or Trumpflation, or the shitty job numbers that just came out.

Sez the clown who can’t stay on topic.

Not an Epstein thread, Simp.

 

[Marener]

I’m sure you can quit/e dozens of your posts calling for Biden to be prosecuted, right?

Dodge incoming in 3….2……

To be prosecuted, you have to actually be able to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.

It doesn’t seem like that’s possible, which is why he’s not being prosecuted.

Probably being guilty and being guilty behind a reasonable doubt are different thresholds.

Trump can be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

[BlindBoo]

You didn't answer when did the FBI raid Hillary Clinton?
She wasn't president either and never will be, but they didn't raid her house for classified document misuse which was clearly the case.

Sec. Clinton was never accused of absconding with any Classified Document when she left office. Furthermore she never ignored a subpoena to return any classified document in her possession.

 

[Nostra]

To be prosecuted, you have to actually be able to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.

It doesn’t seem like that’s possible, which is why he’s not being prosecuted.

Probably being guilty and being guilty behind a reasonable doubt are different thresholds.

Trump can be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

1. Biden had ZERO authority to view classified docs outside of a SCIF.

2. Biden was caught with classified material hidden in several,locations.


Explain how his guilt couldn’t be proven, Dumbass.

 

[Nostra]

Sec. Clinton was never accused of absconding with any Classified Document when she left office. Furthermore she never ignored a subpoena to return any classified document in her possession.

She destroyed all of them after they were under subpoena, Simp.

 

[struth]

To be prosecuted, you have to actually be able to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.

It doesn’t seem like that’s possible, which is why he’s not being prosecuted.

Probably being guilty and being guilty behind a reasonable doubt are different thresholds.

Trump can be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

No, to be convicted you have prove it beyond a reasonable doubt

Hence why Jack smith could never convict Trump

 

[Marener]

1. Biden had ZERO authority to view classified docs outside of a SCIF.

2. Biden was caught with classified material hidden in several,locations.


Explain how his guilt couldn’t be proven, Dumbass.

1. Nope.

2. So what?

It’s explained in the Hur report. Biden’s defense is he was unaware of these documents and didn’t intentionally take them after leaving office. Hur felt the DoJ couldn’t prove otherwise beyond a reasonable doubt.

This is in contrast to Trump who hid documents from the DoJ’s subpoena. If Trump had just turned everything over right away, then he probably wouldn’t have been prosecuted. He could have claimed he didn’t intentionally take anything. Except for maybe the times when he showed his documents to other people. Not sure about that.

 

[struth]

1. Nope.

2. So what?

It’s explained in the Hur report. Biden’s defense is he was unaware of these documents and didn’t intentionally take them after leaving office. Hur felt the DoJ couldn’t prove otherwise beyond a reasonable doubt.

This is in contrast to Trump who hid documents from the DoJ’s subpoena. If Trump had just turned everything over right away, then he probably wouldn’t have been prosecuted. He could have claimed he didn’t intentionally take anything.

The Hur report made clear xiden couldn’t be prosecuted because he was senile


And dems still voted for him to be their nominee

Sheep

 

[Nostra]

1. Nope.

2. So what?

It’s explained in the Hur report. Biden’s defense is he was unaware of these documents and didn’t intentionally take them after leaving office. Hur felt the DoJ couldn’t prove otherwise beyond a reasonable doubt.

This is in contrast to Trump who hid documents from the DoJ’s subpoena. If Trump had just turned everything over right away, then he probably wouldn’t have been prosecuted. He could have claimed he didn’t intentionally take anything. Except for maybe the times when he showed his documents to other people. Not sure about that.

Explain how you steal classified documents from a SCIF, dozens of times over decades, Simp.

Just wondering how you think that could be an accident.

GO!

 

[Marener]

Explain how you steal classified documents from a SCIF, dozens of times over decades, Simp.

Just wondering how you think that could be an accident.

GO!

Prove that they were taken from a SCIF. Unless you can prove that, your question does not have a legitimate basis.

 

[Nostra]

Prove that they were taken from a SCIF. Unless you can prove that, your question does not have a legitimate basis.

So you are ignorantly of the fact a SCIF is the only location a Senator and VP can view top secret info.

Par for the course.

 

[Marener]

So you are ignorantly of the fact a SCIF is the only location a Senator and VP can view top secret info.

Par for the course.

You better tell Hur because that’s not what he discovered upon investigation.

But of course you know better than the guy who actually interviewed Biden and his staff.

Did you even read the Hur report?

 

[Nostra]

You better tell Hur because that’s not what he discovered upon investigation.

But of course you know better than the guy who actually interviewed Biden and his staff.

Did you even read the Hur report?

Hur found Tater was a vegetable and wouldn’t know he was in a court room.

 

[Marener]

Hur found Tater was a vegetable and wouldn’t know he was in a court room.

That doesn’t answer the question. Did you read the Hur report?

You claim it’s a fact Biden took info out of a SCIF but can’t prove it. That’s a problem.

 

[Nostra]

That doesn’t answer the question. Did you read the Hur report?

You claim it’s a fact Biden took info out of a SCIF but can’t prove it. That’s a problem.

Yes, stupid. His did I know Hur concluded Tater was a vegetable.

Once again you demonstrate your ignorance on SCIFs

 

[Marener]

Yes, stupid. His did I know Hur concluded Tater was a vegetable.

Okay. Then did you read the part where it talks about how classified information was handled by the vice president and his staff?

 

[SeaMajor7]

Okay. Then did you read the part where it talks about how classified information was handled by the vice president and his staff?

 

[Luckyone]

Exclusive | Ex-Trump prosecutor Jack Smith under investigation by Office of Special Counsel after claims of playing politics: ‘No one is above the law’

“Jack Smith’s actions were clearly driven to hurt President Trump’s election, and Smith should be held fully accountable,” said Senate Intelligence Committee chair Sen Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) in …

nypost.com

Lawfare by prosecutors must be stamped out. Smith better be ready to answer for his actions.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Did Biden gave authority to keep SAP level classified docks in his open garage?

Marener

No.

Neither Biden, Pence, or Trump were charged with having classified documents.

Ww