Offical Impeachment Thread

[Ame®icano]

Today's media hack echo chamber blabbering point....

View attachment 289635

Mark Quigley (D): "Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct, and it's certainly valid in this instance."

 

[The Purge]

That it wasn't legally late doesn't mean a Hold had not been placed on it.

edit oops

For the terminally stupid ABNORMALS...perhaps you need me to explain the English to you?

The President had been consulting with his national security leadership team to determine the best use of Ukraine security assistance funds to achieve US national security interests,” Office of Management and Budget staff wrote in an email to House Appropriations Committee staff aides. Agencies, OMB said, “must wait to obligate them until the policy review process is complete and the President had made a final determination.”

 

[Bush92]

Correct! Trump released the aid within 48 hours of learning Congress had been informed of the whistleblower report. Nothing says release the military aid like, 'oh fuck, they're on to us'.

He had 20 more days, LEGALLY, YOU DUMBFUCK!

And he didn't waste any time once he knew Congress had been informed of the whistleblower. The jig was up.

If that was the case why wait TWO DAYS...WHY NOT IMMEDIATELY???

What's the rush? He had 20 more days,

Well, he could have always send BLANKETS INSTEAD OF MILITARY AID LIKE THE SURRENDER MONKEY DID...LOOK IT UP. ASSWIPE!

Trump sent weapons. Obama sent blankets.

 

[NotYourBody]

If "the people" think it is a wast of their time, that's a win for the republicans.

How many average people do the Dims really think sat around to listen to some idiot wax on about the history of Ukraine in global politics for an hour / hour and half before even mentioning Giuliani or Trump and then, only by hearsay, opinion and supposition to say that the PRESIDENT'S FOREIGN POLICY DID NOT FIT HIS?!

EXACTLY... this today was a complete SNOOZE FEST, and I guarantee, VERY few people watched it. But there was no GOTCHA, there was no new HEAD LINE, there wasn't ANYTHING, and the demtrash were banking on this being the BIG DAY, THIS WAS IT, this was their two STAR WITNESSES... we were supposed to see OVERWHELMING, something... but no, we saw NOTHING.

It's BACK FIRING, and if Nancy has a BRAIN CELL LEFT, she's going to be PULLING THE PLUG on ScHITf like FRIDAY.

The networks spent millions in lost adverting revenue to air this commercial free non stop, the same people that ran reruns of Leave It To Beaver last July rather than air the 4th celebration of our nation, its heroes and military because they considered THAT a waste of money. I only had the hearing on in the background and it was bad enough, folks who propped toothpicks in their eyes today for the "big show" won't be tuning in again much tomorrow.

I watched every second and will do the same tomorrow. I can't speak for those who can't understand the big words.

Get a job

I don't need one.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Hearsay is not admissible evidence, as Jordan made very clear with Sondland's correction

And he was wrong, and so are you. And he was later corrected in his lie by another congressman.

 

[joaquinmiller]

Correct! Trump released the aid within 48 hours of learning Congress had been informed of the whistleblower report. Nothing says release the military aid like, 'oh fuck, they're on to us'.

He had 20 more days, LEGALLY, YOU DUMBFUCK!

And he didn't waste any time once he knew Congress had been informed of the whistleblower. The jig was up.

If that was the case why wait TWO DAYS...WHY NOT IMMEDIATELY???

What's the rush? He had 20 more days,

Well, he could have always send BLANKETS INSTEAD OF MILITARY AID LIKE THE SURRENDER MONKEY DID...LOOK IT UP. ASSWIPE!

The problem is what Trump was asking for in exchange for releasing the aid - whether weapon or wampum doesn't matter. You fellas have a knack for irrelevance.

 

[OKTexas]

It can't be helped you have clamped your hands over your eyes and ears and only parrot what your masters tell you to parrot.

You are a waste of time.

^ Extortion

Not even close. So how long do you republicans plan on being disingenuous?

Food for thought. It is what our foreign policy is based on and Trump was trying to weaponized it against his domestic opposition.

Some opposition. The guy doesn't even know which way to face on stage or what state he's in. Being a Democrat presidential nominee for your party doesn't insulate you from being looked into for suspicious activity. Trump never once mentioned Biden in the context as a contestant or even the election for that matter. In other words, the Democrats are going to make up "their" reason why Trump asked Zelensky to look into the situation.

Like I said, this is an impeachment based on the Thought Police.

Biden wasn't the only target in the long running plot to weaponize our foreign policy against the Democrats.

Where's your proof, where's your links?

.

 

[playtime]

Hearsay is not admissible evidence, as Jordan made very clear with Sondland's correction that had 6 men and 4 conversations making a mockery of Taylor's "clear (3rd hand) understanding".

Ken Starr nailed the summary, not a hint of a crime was presented, let alone an impeachable crime.

sondland will be front & center to testify as a first person witness next week - on wednesday i believe; so there goes your little happy place thought bubble popping.

 

[kyzr]

Hearsay is not admissible evidence, as Jordan made very clear with Sondland's correction

And he was wrong, and so are you. And he was later corrected in his lie by another congressman.

Ken Starr summed up today's testimony perfectly: there was no hint of a crime, let alone an impeachable crime. No one layed a glove on Trump today.

 

[Nostra]

Amb Taylor testified under oath that one of his staffers was walking by and heard Trump on his cell phone talking to Sondland about Ukraine. The only problem with his testimony is he told the committee how Sondland responded to a question by Trump.

If this guy was just walking by and eves dropped on Trump's end of the call, how does he know what Sondland was saying on the other end?

This is how amateurish this entire farce is.

 

[The Purge]

He had 20 more days, LEGALLY, YOU DUMBFUCK!

And he didn't waste any time once he knew Congress had been informed of the whistleblower. The jig was up.

If that was the case why wait TWO DAYS...WHY NOT IMMEDIATELY???

What's the rush? He had 20 more days,

Well, he could have always send BLANKETS INSTEAD OF MILITARY AID LIKE THE SURRENDER MONKEY DID...LOOK IT UP. ASSWIPE!

The problem is what Trump was asking for in exchange for releasing the aid - whether weapon or wampum doesn't matter. You fellas have a knack for irrelevance.

He asked for NOTHING as the transcript proves....but low IQ liberals will follow lying talkingvpoints to their deaths!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Hearsay is not admissible evidence, as Jordan made very clear with Sondland's correction

And he was wrong, and so are you. And he was later corrected in his lie by another congressman.

Ken Starr summed up today's testimony perfectly: there was no hint of a crime, let alone an impeachable crime. No one layed a glove on Trump today.

Ah yes, change lanes. I figured you would. You can't admit you and Jordan are ass backwards wrong, because then you can't regurgitate the same wrong talking point in another thread.

 

[Nostra]

Amb Taylor testified under oath that one of his staffers was walking by and heard Trump on his cell phone talking to Sondland about Ukraine. The only problem with his testimony is he told the committee how Sondland responded to a question by Trump.

If this guy was just walking by and eves dropped on Trump's end of the call, how does he know what Sondland was saying on the other end?

This is how amateurish this entire farce is.

 

[kyzr]

Hearsay is not admissible evidence, as Jordan made very clear with Sondland's correction that had 6 men and 4 conversations making a mockery of Taylor's "clear (3rd hand) understanding".

Ken Starr nailed the summary, not a hint of a crime was presented, let alone an impeachable crime.

sondland will be front & center to testify as a first person witness next week - on wednesday i believe; so there goes your little happy place thought bubble popping.

That's ok, all Sondland can testify to is a "thought crime" since no crime was committed, let alone an impeachable crime.
Ukraine got the money and didn't investigate the Bidens, QED, no crime, period, full stop.
Trump has every right to investigate corruption no matter who is involved, Burisma is as dirty as companies get, they both testified to that.

 

[easyt65]

Schiff has been petrified of the GOP getting a chance to speak or ask questions - today Schiff's worst fears came to life:

The Republicans were able to destroy his 'star witness'...

...make it perfectly clear that every one of Schiff's witnesses are NOT 'witnesses' because they never WITNESSED anything...

... made it clear this whole Impeachment is based on ZERO evidence & not 1 real existing 'witness'...

...got Schiff to lie about the existence of a whistleblower / his knowledge of the identity of the whistleblower...

...got Schiff to agree to include in the official record that he has zero credibility based on his attempted 'parody' evidence at an earlier hearing...

...AND got one of Schiff's own witnesses to put heat on the Biden's by bringing their potential crimes and Joe's 'conflict' up while stating THEY (Joe & Hunter) should be investigated....

Bwuhahaha....

This was a GREAT day for the President, the GOP, Americans, and the country....

...a horrible day for Schiff, the Bidens, Pelosi, and Democrats!

.

 

[Baz Ares]

Okay, seems I understand the DOPers fully here.
the Great Douche being Impeached as involved in Missles-For-Dirt-GATE!
the Great Douche Lies and Deeds are fully illegal. And they are not Americans giving IT Dirt.
Compared to!
Bubba Clinton being Impeached on a Lie over a legal BlowJob.
(Nobody really cares about, really, and as we see the DOPer leader pays Porn stars for sex.).
Where if not done with an underage partner is not illegal. Well, the Great Douche paid for sex and no movie was made to follow the laws on Porn Star Raw Dogging is legal.
So, both of them are liars, and it seems to the DOPers, care more about a lie about a legal Blowjob are more impeachable here?
As we all are okay the Blowjob never put America at risk, like being involved with a foreign county in election fraud on the USA voters.

Clear this up DOPers. Did I miss anythang?

 

[playtime]

Hearsay is not admissible evidence, as Jordan made very clear with Sondland's correction that had 6 men and 4 conversations making a mockery of Taylor's "clear (3rd hand) understanding".

Ken Starr nailed the summary, not a hint of a crime was presented, let alone an impeachable crime.

sondland will be front & center to testify as a first person witness next week - on wednesday i believe; so there goes your little happy place thought bubble popping.

That's ok, all Sondland can testify to is a "thought crime" since no crime was committed, let alone an impeachable crime.
Ukraine got the money and didn't investigate the Bidens, QED, no crime, period, full stop.

sondalnd admitted that there was a shake down.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The most explosive revelation came from Taylor, who told lawmakers that one of his aides overheard Gordon Sondland — the U.S. ambassador to the European Union and a top Trump campaign donor — on the phone with the president, during which the aide could hear Trump ask about “the investigations.” Taylor said Sondland told the president that the Ukrainians were “ready to move forward.”

The aide told Taylor that Sondland subsequently relayed “that President Trump cares more about the investigations of Biden, which [Rudy] Giuliani was pressing for.” Taylor said he was “not aware of this information” when he testified at a private deposition on Oct. 22, and only learned of it last week.


Democrats land damning new evidence in impeachment testimony

Democrat dreams in one song title....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Born in Ukraine, or hand picked by trump, it doesn't seem to matter...everyone willing to testify seems to agree that this was exactly what everyone knows it was.

 

[kyzr]

Hearsay is not admissible evidence, as Jordan made very clear with Sondland's correction that had 6 men and 4 conversations making a mockery of Taylor's "clear (3rd hand) understanding".

Ken Starr nailed the summary, not a hint of a crime was presented, let alone an impeachable crime.

sondland will be front & center to testify as a first person witness next week - on wednesday i believe; so there goes your little happy place thought bubble popping.

That's ok, all Sondland can testify to is a "thought crime" since no crime was committed, let alone an impeachable crime.
Ukraine got the money and didn't investigate the Bidens, QED, no crime, period, full stop.

sondalnd admitted that there was a shake down.

There is a difference between a shakedown and a request to investigate corruption. Sondland said over and over, there is no QPQ, there is no QPQ, meaning that the money was released and no investigation happened. Ken Starr said that there is no crime, let alone an impeachable crime.