Obama's Grandmother Says He Was Born In Kenya

[Lastamender]

Laughing......so you're quoting yourself.

Exactly as I predicted.

Damn I'm good.

Why shouldn't I? I am telling the truth about the most dangerous and evil traitorous president we ever had. I could give one **** about your opinion.

 

[Skylar]

Why shouldn't I? I am telling the truth about the most dangerous and evil traitorous president we ever had. I could give one **** about your opinion.

Because you have no idea what you're talking about and you use 'Cliff from the Internet' as a primary source?

 

[Lastamender]

Because you have no idea what you're talking about and you use 'Cliff from the Internet' as a primary source?

Cliff is just as good, if not better than, the NYT or the WP.

 

[Skylar]

Cliff is just as good, if not better than, the NYT or the WP.

Says you, citing you. ANd you're gulliable enough that you accepted "Cliff from the Internet" literally just typing an accusation, backed by nothing.

You start with your conspiracy first. You ignore any source, no matter how much evidence supports it, if it contradicts you. You believe any source, no matter if they have nothing to back them, if it says what you want to believe.

You're an irrational person. That's why you citing you isn't a source. Its an excuse for one.

 

[Faun]

All you are saying is that a lot of dumbasses believed the media lies about him. Next.

LOL

Slobbers the lunatic who still thinks the 2020 election was stolen.

 

[Faun]

Cliff is just as good, if not better than, the NYT or the WP.

 

[Lastamender]

Says you, citing you. ANd you're gulliable enough that you accepted "Cliff from the Internet" literally just typing an accusation, backed by nothing.

You start with your conspiracy first. You ignore any source, no matter how much evidence supports it, if it contradicts you. You believe any source, no matter if they have nothing to back them, if it says what you want to believe.

You're an irrational person. That's why you citing you isn't a source. Its an excuse for one.

I am very rational. I am not stupid enough to believe Obama did one thing to strengthen this country. He systematically weakened it and weaponized the DOJ, the FBI, and the IRS against political opponents.

 

[Faun]

I am very rational. I am not stupid enough to believe Obama did one thing to strengthen this country. He systematically weakened it and weaponized the DOJ, the FBI, and the IRS against political opponents.

Bullshit, you're rational. Rational people don't believe the 2020 election was stolen when they themselves claim there's been no proof yet.

 

[Lastamender]

Bullshit, you're rational. Rational people don't believe the 2020 election was stolen when they themselves claim there's been no proof yet.

Oh yes rational people do. In fact it is irrational to think a sitting president received 12 million more votes than his first election and lost.

 

[Skylar]

I am very rational. I am not stupid enough to believe Obama did one thing to strengthen this country. He systematically weakened it and weaponized the DOJ, the FBI, and the IRS against political opponents.

You're irrational 4 times over.

You invent a conspiracy before evidence to support it is even possible. Pushing a conspiracy without evidence is explicitly irrational, as your basis of argument is feeling and belief. Neither of which is actual evidence.

You ignore evidence that contradicts you. Any evidence. Any investigation, any audit, any official, any agency, any vote tally, any document, any ruling. The evidence contradicting you is legion. And you close your eyes to all of it. That's doubly irrational.

You cling to your conspiracies despite the lack of evidence. That's triple irrational.

And finally, you accept as credible anything that apes what you want to believe. Even if your primary source is 'Cliff from the Internet', backed by nothing. That's quadruple irrational.

You are an aggressively irrational person. Which is why you citing yourself is a meaningless standard.

 

[Skylar]

Obama was , and is, a traitor.

Says the man that has already called for Obama's execution based on imaginary passages of the constitution.

You're violently irrational.

 

[Skylar]

Oh yes rational people do. In fact it is irrational to think a sitting president received 12 million more votes than his first election and lost.

Its irrational to conclude that 88 million is MORE that 74 million? Its irrational to conclude 304 is MORE than 232?

Thank you for once again demonstrating that you citing yourself is just meaningless gibberish.

 

[Lastamender]

You're irrational 4 times over.

You invent a conspiracy before evidence to support it is even possible. Pushing a conspiracy without evidence is explicitly irrational, as your basis of argument is feeling and belief. Neither of which is actual evidence.

You ignore evidence that contradicts you. Any evidence. Any investigation, any audit, any official, any agency, any vote tally, any document, any ruling. The evidence contradicting you is legion. And you close your eyes to all of it. That's doubly irrational.

You cling to your conspiracies despite the lack of evidence. That's triple irrational.

And finally, you accept as credible anything that apes what you want to believe. Even if your primary source is 'Cliff from the Internet', backed by nothing. That's quadruple irrational.

You are an aggressively irrational person. Which is why you citing yourself is a meaningless standard.

You are wasting your time.

 

[Skylar]

You are wasting your time.

Oh, I know I can't use evidence to convince you. You have no use for evidence.

But you're not here to be convinced. You're here to demonstrate the absurdity of the process of conspiracy theorists.

And you are my first, best argument against the batshit you offer.

 

[Faun]

Oh yes rational people do. In fact it is irrational to think a sitting president received 12 million more votes than his first election and lost.

So what that Trump gained 12 million votes but lost?

 

[Skylar]

So what that Trump gained 12 million votes but lost?

I don't think Last gets that elections are always relative to what the other candidates got in votes.

Math is hard.

 

[Lastamender]

Oh, I know I can't use evidence to convince you. You have no use for evidence.

But you're not here to be convinced. You're here to demonstrate the absurdity of the process of conspiracy theorists.

And you are my first, best argument against the batshit you offer.

You have no evidence. You have the word of proven liars. That is basically all you have ever had.

 

[Faun]

You have no evidence. You have the word of proven liars. That is basically all you have ever had.

Still waiting, FruitLoops....

So what that Trump gained 12 million votes but lost? How is that proof Trump won the election given a) his opponent still got more votes; and b) the popular vote doesn't elect the president?

 

[Lastamender]

Still waiting, FruitLoops....

So what that Trump gained 12 million votes but lost? How is that proof Trump won the election given a) his opponent still got more votes; and b) the popular vote doesn't elect the president?

The history of presidential elections proves it. It also says someone who wins 19 out of 20 bellwether counties does not lose either.

 

[Skylar]

You have no evidence. You have the word of proven liars. That is basically all you have ever had.

That Obama was born in Hawaii? We have his birth certificate, affirmed by the State of Hawaii. That's prima facie in any court.

On the election? I have the election results, both popular vote and the electoral vote. That's prima facie in any court.

You're confused.