Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So how do you explain the other 17-19%?Well.. accept about 30% can't give up on the dream..
As I've pointed out plenty of times before, no one has "woken" up to anything, nor have they done it particularly fast. Reagan, Bush Sr., Clinton and Ford all hit lower numbers than Obama has ever had in their first years as President.
The great state of Massachusetts would disagree with you, doc.
This was about Washington DC, and obama politics more than it was about Coakley.
But, go ahead....keep drinking the Kool-Aid, I understand.
special backroom deals
Now, one year later has nothing to show for it but broken promises and lies.
So how do you explain the other 17-19%?
As I've pointed out plenty of times before, no one has "woken" up to anything, nor have they done it particularly fast. Reagan, Bush Sr., Clinton and Ford all hit lower numbers than Obama has ever had in their first years as President.
The great state of Massachusetts would disagree with you, doc.
This was about Washington DC, and obama politics more than it was about Coakley.
But, go ahead....keep drinking the Kool-Aid, I understand.
You're the one who brought up the Massachusetts special election. When you make a claim that people are "waking up" to Obama, you need to back it up - and as I said, Obama's numbers right now are better than Reagan's were at this point in his presidency. The only poll that matters is the election in 2012.
The only poll that matters is the election in 2012.
Like Jimmy Carter, Obama wll be a one-term wonder.
Oh.. and what a year it was.
What's to be remembered, passing the Buck to Bush, unemployment, national debt, more brave soldiers to Afghanistan, bail-outs, change you can believe in, Obamacare, legal bribes, partisan politics, Iran, Iraq, transparency, from great heights and hopes to reality, the better off now than a year ago.
Who knows, no doubt, it's been an event filled year with more downs than ups in my humble opinion.
What stands out in your opinion?
So how do you explain the other 17-19%?
As I've pointed out plenty of times before, no one has "woken" up to anything, nor have they done it particularly fast. Reagan, Bush Sr., Clinton and Ford all hit lower numbers than Obama has ever had in their first years as President.
The great state of Massachusetts would disagree with you, doc.
This was about Washington DC, and obama politics more than it was about Coakley.
But, go ahead....keep drinking the Kool-Aid, I understand.
You're the one who brought up the Massachusetts special election. When you make a claim that people are "waking up" to Obama, you need to back it up - and as I said, Obama's numbers right now are better than Reagan's were at this point in his presidency. The only poll that matters is the election in 2012.
The great state of Massachusetts would disagree with you, doc.
This was about Washington DC, and obama politics more than it was about Coakley.
But, go ahead....keep drinking the Kool-Aid, I understand.
You're the one who brought up the Massachusetts special election. When you make a claim that people are "waking up" to Obama, you need to back it up - and as I said, Obama's numbers right now are better than Reagan's were at this point in his presidency. The only poll that matters is the election in 2012.
Need some Kool-Aid? This election was about obama, if obama ran tonight, he would have lost. Anything can happen by 2012, but I think this thread was about obama's first year...wasn't it?
You're the one who brought up the Massachusetts special election. When you make a claim that people are "waking up" to Obama, you need to back it up - and as I said, Obama's numbers right now are better than Reagan's were at this point in his presidency. The only poll that matters is the election in 2012.
Need some Kool-Aid? This election was about obama, if obama ran tonight, he would have lost. Anything can happen by 2012, but I think this thread was about obama's first year...wasn't it?
What possible reason can you come up with that Obama would have lost had he been running tonight? As much as you try to make tonight about Obama, poll numbers say different.
Let me also clear something up. I don't support Obama that much, I think he's doing a mediocre job - but still. Have some sense. You claim I "drank the koolaid", but you're just parroting what the right wing talking heads say every day.
Need some Kool-Aid? This election was about obama, if obama ran tonight, he would have lost. Anything can happen by 2012, but I think this thread was about obama's first year...wasn't it?
What possible reason can you come up with that Obama would have lost had he been running tonight? As much as you try to make tonight about Obama, poll numbers say different.
Let me also clear something up. I don't support Obama that much, I think he's doing a mediocre job - but still. Have some sense. You claim I "drank the koolaid", but you're just parroting what the right wing talking heads say every day.
Poll numbers do indeed say differently..he would have lost based on his last year in office. Why do you settle for mediocrity?
What possible reason can you come up with that Obama would have lost had he been running tonight? As much as you try to make tonight about Obama, poll numbers say different.
Let me also clear something up. I don't support Obama that much, I think he's doing a mediocre job - but still. Have some sense. You claim I "drank the koolaid", but you're just parroting what the right wing talking heads say every day.
Poll numbers do indeed say differently..he would have lost based on his last year in office. Why do you settle for mediocrity?
Because it's better than either extreme.
Poll numbers do indeed say differently..he would have lost based on his last year in office. Why do you settle for mediocrity?
Because it's better than either extreme.
Last time I checked it went extreme left-left-centrist-right-extreme right NOT extreme left-mediocrity-left. That's the problem with you on the left...if you can't have your extremist agenda supported by America you just settle for a mediocre extreme leftist. Why can't you accept the fact that NEGOTIATION with the minority party is part of politics? Why?
Because it's better than either extreme.
Last time I checked it went extreme left-left-centrist-right-extreme right NOT extreme left-mediocrity-left. That's the problem with you on the left...if you can't have your extremist agenda supported by America you just settle for a mediocre extreme leftist. Why can't you accept the fact that NEGOTIATION with the minority party is part of politics? Why?
What are you talking about? If the current administration was as "extreme left" as you claim, we'd have single payer healthcare, not a corporatist-sellout watered down healthcare bill that the administration STILL can't pass? The "minority voice" that you were claiming I can't accept is why the healthcare bill is pretty much dead - of course I accept it, I revel in it. The minority voice is what keeps the country from going altogether insane at either extreme. Although my personal politics may lean left - I am in no way an extremist - I'm also a realist, and I know that the status quo is all that can be supported by our system. To "radically" change the system, either to the far right or the far left - will destroy our country.
To clarify - A public option is not "far left", a totalitarian communist state is. Trickle-down economics is not "far right", an anarchist libertarian state is.
Last time I checked it went extreme left-left-centrist-right-extreme right NOT extreme left-mediocrity-left. That's the problem with you on the left...if you can't have your extremist agenda supported by America you just settle for a mediocre extreme leftist. Why can't you accept the fact that NEGOTIATION with the minority party is part of politics? Why?
What are you talking about? If the current administration was as "extreme left" as you claim, we'd have single payer healthcare, not a corporatist-sellout watered down healthcare bill that the administration STILL can't pass? The "minority voice" that you were claiming I can't accept is why the healthcare bill is pretty much dead - of course I accept it, I revel in it. The minority voice is what keeps the country from going altogether insane at either extreme. Although my personal politics may lean left - I am in no way an extremist - I'm also a realist, and I know that the status quo is all that can be supported by our system. To "radically" change the system, either to the far right or the far left - will destroy our country.
To clarify - A public option is not "far left", a totalitarian communist state is. Trickle-down economics is not "far right", an anarchist libertarian state is.
Uhhhhhhhh...what exactly do you think they tried to RAM DOWN OUR THROATS!!!! So you would be happy with this bribe ridden, debt causing bill if it had your precious public option?
You're the one who brought up the Massachusetts special election. When you make a claim that people are "waking up" to Obama, you need to back it up - and as I said, Obama's numbers right now are better than Reagan's were at this point in his presidency. The only poll that matters is the election in 2012.
Need some Kool-Aid? This election was about obama, if obama ran tonight, he would have lost. Anything can happen by 2012, but I think this thread was about obama's first year...wasn't it?
What possible reason can you come up with that Obama would have lost had he been running tonight? As much as you try to make tonight about Obama, poll numbers say different.
Let me also clear something up. I don't support Obama that much, I think he's doing a mediocre job - but still. Have some sense. You claim I "drank the koolaid", but you're just parroting what the right wing talking heads say every day.
He picked out a First Puppy to help fertilize the First Garden. Oh, and then he also...um...ah...um, I'll have to get back to you.
