So why would you expect them to understand that adding 32 Million new customers, with out doing anything to address a shortage of Doctors and resources might lead to some hard decisions and people not getting the best care they could have?
Yeah,
not a thing.
Anyway, did you actually watch the video in the OP? There were several very serious, very wrong assertions about the role of comparative effectiveness research and the responsibilities of the Office of the National Coordinator for HIT. Do you think presenting those fantasies to a group of voters is defensible?
You think you're giong to get 20 somethings to like up like sheep and pay five figures a year for something they don't want.
20-somethings can satisfy the mandate by buying only catastrophic coverage, they don't have to buy comprehensive coverage (even though many of them would be heavily subsidized if they chose to do so).
Greenbeard:
No matter how you will try to OBFUSCATE and DISTORT the INCONTROVERTIBLE FACTS with
BULLSHIT, your MATH won't be able to overcome the following
THREE TRUE OR FALSE QUESTIONS:
FACT ONE: Obamacare will incur 32 Million ADDITIONAL more currently non-paying patients. True or False ?
FACT TWO: Given the data, there is a projection that there will be 46% less MDs. True or False ?
FACT THREE: Even without the projection, with 32 million ADDITIONAL currently none paying patients and the SAME number of MDs there WILL be prodigious rationing ? True or False ?
No matter how you try to DELUGE these THREE FACTS with OBAMARRHOIDAL BULLSHIT your
BULLSHIT can't overcome the OBVIOUS MATH.