Obama Talking About Working Together While He's Working To Split Us Apart

[Nosmo King]

First you need to LEARN that the TEA party isn't a formal party but a movement by millions of angry American citizens tired of the yaksqueeze being spewed by the elitist Statists in the District of Criminals.

People that want thier country back.

From whom? Our elected officials? Or corporate special interests?

Elected officials and special interests. all special interests not just corporate.

You shrink the size of government and the power elected officials and special interests have over us becomes diminished. Both only have power when the government is big and bloated.

If shrinking government means we have to suffer more AIGs and Lehman Brothers because of lack of oversight, is that a good thing? If shrinking government means we have to suffer workplace safety standards that would make sweat shops look like a fine middle class job opportunity, is that a good thing? If shrinking government means the Cuyahoga River is free to burn again because burning rivers means jobs, is that a good thing?

 

[Conservative]

Well, they've been telling us today that the $450 bil is already paid for.

The first question is how?

Like you said....through cuts recommended by the Super Committee.

So he robs from Peter to pay Paul again.

I have an idea. He can create jobs with just two words...


I resign.

The economy would take off if he did. He isn't interested in that. He is only interested in making this nation pay for what he perceives as robbing others to achieve greatness. He's on a personal vendetta to ruin us. His record shows it as does his vitriol. But what to expect from a rank amateur that got his start in politics by being a Marxist radical shit disturber community organizer like the great Jimmy Hoffa.

Obama can't swing a bat like Hoffa.

He can't pitch for shit, either...
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJBlwUfIoDk]Obama's First Pitch - D'oh!!! - YouTube[/ame]

unlike certain other presidents...
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXuxCqPKflo]2001 World Series Game 3 - President Bush Throws Out First Pitch - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Moonglow]

Just elect Bachman, she'll wave her magic wand and all will be good again.

 

[Avatar4321]

People should be watching their own money, The federal government doesnt. If they put them in failing banks, then they lose their money. It sucks, but thats how it is.

 

[The T]

From whom? Our elected officials? Or corporate special interests?

Elected officials and special interests. all special interests not just corporate.

You shrink the size of government and the power elected officials and special interests have over us becomes diminished. Both only have power when the government is big and bloated.

If shrinking government means we have to suffer more AIGs and Lehman Brothers because of lack of oversight, is that a good thing? If shrinking government means we have to suffer workplace safety standards that would make sweat shops look like a fine middle class job opportunity, is that a good thing? If shrinking government means the Cuyahoga River is free to burn again because burning rivers means jobs, is that a good thing?

LAW will take care of the robbers. Government needs to get the hell outta the way of commerce.

Don't you think it's odd that the Government is screaming jobs, jobs, jobs...as they stand in the way because they don't trust the people?

Tell me this? Rick Perry said the SS System is a Ponzi Scheme last night (which he is correct)...Why is it that Bernie Madoff gets put in jail for a similiar scheme and our electeds get off scot-free for the same offense perpetrated on the people?

Simple. Hint: Madoff wasn't forcing it at the point of a gun.

 

[mudwhistle]

From whom? Our elected officials? Or corporate special interests?

Elected officials and special interests. all special interests not just corporate.

You shrink the size of government and the power elected officials and special interests have over us becomes diminished. Both only have power when the government is big and bloated.

If shrinking government means we have to suffer more AIGs and Lehman Brothers because of lack of oversight, is that a good thing? If shrinking government means we have to suffer workplace safety standards that would make sweat shops look like a fine middle class job opportunity, is that a good thing? If shrinking government means the Cuyahoga River is free to burn again because burning rivers means jobs, is that a good thing?

OSHA standards aren't a risk here.

Damn....you're going off an one hell of a tangent now.

I think people have heard enough about the AIGs and the Jet owner Bull Shit.

That dog won't hunt.

 

[Gadawg73]

My nephew just turned down a job at Kroger on the night shift.
"I ain't working for no less than $10 an hour"
While his condo is being foreclosed on.
"God will provide" is his response.

 

[Conservative]

My nephew just turned down a job at Kroger on the night shift.
"I ain't working for no less than $10 an hour"
While his condo is being foreclosed on.
"God will provide" is his response.

God just sent him a job offer, and he rejected it.

 

[Nosmo King]

People should be watching their own money, The federal government doesnt. If they put them in failing banks, then they lose their money. It sucks, but thats how it is.

Even if those failing banks act against the law to reap profits while fudging foreclosure papers all to gain profits?

No government means no protection of law. and that's anarchy. That's poisonous to society. That's what some of the extreme right want, whether they're smart enough to realize it or not.

 

[The T]

People should be watching their own money, The federal government doesnt. If they put them in failing banks, then they lose their money. It sucks, but thats how it is.

You'd think people would check out financial instituions for thier health/portfolio before they decide? A little education goes a long way.

Just because they have the word BANK in thier name these days doesn't mean squat...nor does the fact that they are insured by FDIC. It's worthless.

 

[The T]

People should be watching their own money, The federal government doesnt. If they put them in failing banks, then they lose their money. It sucks, but thats how it is.

Even if those failing banks act against the law to reap profits while fudging foreclosure papers all to gain profits?

No government means no protection of law. and that's anarchy. That's poisonous to society. That's what some of the extreme right want, whether they're smart enough to realize it or not.

NO One wants this. ONLY in your mind. Stop reading talking points.

 

[Nosmo King]

Elected officials and special interests. all special interests not just corporate.

You shrink the size of government and the power elected officials and special interests have over us becomes diminished. Both only have power when the government is big and bloated.

If shrinking government means we have to suffer more AIGs and Lehman Brothers because of lack of oversight, is that a good thing? If shrinking government means we have to suffer workplace safety standards that would make sweat shops look like a fine middle class job opportunity, is that a good thing? If shrinking government means the Cuyahoga River is free to burn again because burning rivers means jobs, is that a good thing?

LAW will take care of the robbers. Government needs to get the hell outta the way of commerce.

Don't you think it's odd that the Government is screaming jobs, jobs, jobs...as they stand in the way because they don't trust the people?

Tell me this? Rick Perry said the SS System is a Ponzi Scheme last night (which he is correct)...Why is it that Bernie Madoff gets put in jail for a similiar scheme and our electeds get off scot-free for the same offense perpetrated on the people?

Simple. Hint: Madoff wasn't forcing it at the point of a gun.

Laws are only enforced if there's a cop on the beat. When you take away government oversight, you remove the cop.

 

[yidnar]

Obama talked about to many jobs going overseas ....I agree with him !! So why is he going to raise capital gain's taxes ?? and did you see his Head of jobs council sitting beside the first lady ?? GE's CEO Jeffrey Immelt is moving even more of tax exempt GE's infrastructure to communist China !! The simple truth is this ...His grand standing was nothing more than a pep rally for the left and the set up for blame against fiscally responsible conservatives that will fight against his insane policies!!

 

[Nosmo King]

People should be watching their own money, The federal government doesnt. If they put them in failing banks, then they lose their money. It sucks, but thats how it is.

Even if those failing banks act against the law to reap profits while fudging foreclosure papers all to gain profits?

No government means no protection of law. and that's anarchy. That's poisonous to society. That's what some of the extreme right want, whether they're smart enough to realize it or not.

NO One wants this. ONLY in your mind. Stop reading talking points.

Then what precisely does the Tea party talking point "shrink the size of government" mean? What precisely does the talking point "onerous government regulation" mean?

 

[The T]

If shrinking government means we have to suffer more AIGs and Lehman Brothers[/B] because of lack of oversight, is that a good thing? If shrinking government means we have to suffer workplace safety standards that would make sweat shops look like a fine middle class job opportunity, is that a good thing? If shrinking government means the Cuyahoga River is free to burn again because burning rivers means jobs, is that a good thing?

LAW will take care of the robbers. Government needs to get the hell outta the way of commerce.

Don't you think it's odd that the Government is screaming jobs, jobs, jobs...as they stand in the way because they don't trust the people?

Tell me this? Rick Perry said the SS System is a Ponzi Scheme last night (which he is correct)...Why is it that Bernie Madoff gets put in jail for a similiar scheme and our electeds get off scot-free for the same offense perpetrated on the people?

Simple. Hint: Madoff wasn't forcing it at the point of a gun.

Laws are only enforced if there's a cop on the beat. When you take away government oversight, you remove the cop.

And most cops on the beat will tell you that they can't do squat of most crimes unless they witness it for themselves.

That is what courts are for. COPS are referees after the fact.

 

[mudwhistle]

People should be watching their own money, The federal government doesnt. If they put them in failing banks, then they lose their money. It sucks, but thats how it is.

Even if those failing banks act against the law to reap profits while fudging foreclosure papers all to gain profits?

No government means no protection of law. and that's anarchy. That's poisonous to society. That's what some of the extreme right want, whether they're smart enough to realize it or not.

Those failing banks were major contributors to Obama's campaign fund....and also got massive bailouts.

Nobody wants an absence of government. We just want one that doesn't take advantage of us and spend our money as it pleases.

 

[Immanuel]

Even if those failing banks act against the law to reap profits while fudging foreclosure papers all to gain profits?

No government means no protection of law. and that's anarchy. That's poisonous to society. That's what some of the extreme right want, whether they're smart enough to realize it or not.

NO One wants this. ONLY in your mind. Stop reading talking points.

Then what precisely does the Tea party talking point "shrink the size of government" mean? What precisely does the talking point "onerous government regulation" mean?

There is a difference between shrink and eliminate.

When your clothes shrink they don't disappear. Of course, for me, it may just be an excuse when in fact I actually increased in girth.

Immie

 

[mudwhistle]

Even if those failing banks act against the law to reap profits while fudging foreclosure papers all to gain profits?

No government means no protection of law. and that's anarchy. That's poisonous to society. That's what some of the extreme right want, whether they're smart enough to realize it or not.

NO One wants this. ONLY in your mind. Stop reading talking points.

Then what precisely does the Tea party talking point "shrink the size of government" mean? What precisely does the talking point "onerous government regulation" mean?

It means cut spending and stop getting in the way of job creation.....and for that they're called every fucken name in the book.

 

[The T]

People should be watching their own money, The federal government doesnt. If they put them in failing banks, then they lose their money. It sucks, but thats how it is.

Even if those failing banks act against the law to reap profits while fudging foreclosure papers all to gain profits?

No government means no protection of law. and that's anarchy. That's poisonous to society. That's what some of the extreme right want, whether they're smart enough to realize it or not.

Those failing banks were major contributors to Obama's campaign fund....and also got massive bailouts.

Nobody wants an absence of government. We just want one that doesn't take advantage of us and spend our money as it pleases.

People want responsibility TO the people...and not running roughshod over them because they think they can get away with it...(But then we get into stupid people voting without thinking).

 

[The T]

NO One wants this. ONLY in your mind. Stop reading talking points.

Then what precisely does the Tea party talking point "shrink the size of government" mean? What precisely does the talking point "onerous government regulation" mean?

It means cut spending and stop getting in the way of job creation.....and for that they're called every fucken name in the book.

And told to go to Hell...