Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As well as sanford and son
Shows were funny when pc didn't rule everything.
As well as sanford and son
Shows were funny when pc didn't rule everything.
How come when Obama does it the right calls it throwing a tantrum but when a Republicans does it he's using his bully pulpit? Does Gramps even realize he's got a double standard? He's old. Is he a racist? Archie Bunker type bigot?
No I'm not, but I did like all in the family.
Hey Gramps. I want to ask you a question. You guys always talk about how American workers make too much and that is why you send our jobs overseas to China.
American companies are the only companies that pay for healthcare. Wouldn't single payer/socialized medicine go a long way in making American companies more competitive? It would save them billions if you took this off their plate.
But I never hear any Republicans talk about this. Why? Is it because it contradicts your theories? Goes against your position? My brother can be somewhat of a righty and I asked him this and he said "companies like to give healthcare to attract good talent". Bullshit! I'm sure companies would love to take this off their plate.
You guys cry about how much money Sarbanes Oxley is costing companies but what about Healthcare? I bet it cost them much much more.
How come when Obama does it the right calls it throwing a tantrum but when a Republicans does it he's using his bully pulpit? Does Gramps even realize he's got a double standard? He's old. Is he a racist? Archie Bunker type bigot?
No I'm not, but I did like all in the family.
Hey Gramps. I want to ask you a question. You guys always talk about how American workers make too much and that is why you send our jobs overseas to China.
American companies are the only companies that pay for healthcare. Wouldn't single payer/socialized medicine go a long way in making American companies more competitive? It would save them billions if you took this off their plate.
But I never hear any Republicans talk about this. Why? Is it because it contradicts your theories? Goes against your position? My brother can be somewhat of a righty and I asked him this and he said "companies like to give healthcare to attract good talent". Bullshit! I'm sure companies would love to take this off their plate.
This guy is out to lunch.Yahoo! News
US President Barack Obama on Monday challenged the "unelected" Supreme Court not to take the "extraordinary" and "unprecedented" step of overturning his landmark health reform law.
Obama gonna lose his security blanket or binkey on this one?
Oh please....The voting irregularities in Florida were in democrat controlled districts. It was discovered that there was no way to re-create the hanging/dimpled chads without there being more than one voting card in the machine. Since the democrats controlled the polling places, it is they who committed the fraud. Next, the Florida democrats successfully banned all absentee ballots of overseas military personnel. Reason...Military tend ot vote GOP. Again the fraud was perpetrated by the democrats.He's absolutely right.
Over the last decade the Supreme Court:
-Decided and installed an American President.
-Decided that private corporations can take over the land of a private citizen to further their own profit.
-Decided that a state's laws prohibiting the keeping of hand guns went "to far".
-Overturned a century's worth of election finance reform.
-Decided there was a "time limit" on when an employee can bring a case against an employer for unfair wage discrimination
-Decided that a Vice President's meetings with private corporations to determine public policy was secret and not subject to review.
-Decided not to hear cases concerning indefinite detention.
-Decided that police can strip search private citizens no matter what the cause.
It's a radical right wing court involved in judicial activism and legislating from the bench. It's been over stepping it's constitutional boundries for some time now.
Good on the President for pointing that out.
Come back when you can post something relevant to the discussion.70 years of precedent.
WIckard v Filburn.
If the fed can tell a farmer, he can't grow wheat on his own land to feed his own cattle, it can tell you to buy insurance.
Last I looked, you CONZ weren't exactly brushed up on your basic civics or how to use "google" and we see this borne out again here.
To me it shows his disgust for anything that falls outside of his idealism...as well as a WHOLE LOT OF ARROGANCE to assume he knows better than a team of the best lifelong judges and constitutional lawyers in the entire country.
So...He's absolutely right.
Over the last decade the Supreme Court:
-Decided and installed an American President.
-Decided that private corporations can take over the land of a private citizen to further their own profit.
-Decided that a state's laws prohibiting the keeping of hand guns went "to far".
-Overturned a century's worth of election finance reform.
-Decided there was a "time limit" on when an employee can bring a case against an employer for unfair wage discrimination
-Decided that a Vice President's meetings with private corporations to determine public policy was secret and not subject to review.
-Decided not to hear cases concerning indefinite detention.
-Decided that police can strip search private citizens no matter what the cause.
It's a radical right wing court involved in judicial activism and legislating from the bench. It's been over stepping it's constitutional boundries for some time now.
Good on the President for pointing that out.
No I'm not, but I did like all in the family.
Hey Gramps. I want to ask you a question. You guys always talk about how American workers make too much and that is why you send our jobs overseas to China.
American companies are the only companies that pay for healthcare. Wouldn't single payer/socialized medicine go a long way in making American companies more competitive? It would save them billions if you took this off their plate.
But I never hear any Republicans talk about this. Why? Is it because it contradicts your theories? Goes against your position? My brother can be somewhat of a righty and I asked him this and he said "companies like to give healthcare to attract good talent". Bullshit! I'm sure companies would love to take this off their plate.
There are HUGE Changes coming....and, there's very little "conservatives" can do.....
*
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQ1lPPTPSR4]SiCKO - Canadian Waiting Room Scene - YouTube[/ame]
*
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgWjW1PoHf0]Kiefer Sutherland's Grandfather Remembered For Bringing Universal Healthcare System To Canada 1 of 2 - YouTube[/ame]
*
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_ljfnysgF0]Kiefer Sutherland's Grandfather Remembered For Bringing Universal Healthcare System To Canada 2 of 2 - YouTube[/ame]
He's absolutely right.
Over the last decade the Supreme Court:
-Decided and installed an American President.
-Decided that private corporations can take over the land of a private citizen to further their own profit.
-Decided that a state's laws prohibiting the keeping of hand guns went "to far".
-Overturned a century's worth of election finance reform.
-Decided there was a "time limit" on when an employee can bring a case against an employer for unfair wage discrimination
-Decided that a Vice President's meetings with private corporations to determine public policy was secret and not subject to review.
-Decided not to hear cases concerning indefinite detention.
-Decided that police can strip search private citizens no matter what the cause.
It's a radical right wing court involved in judicial activism and legislating from the bench. It's been over stepping it's constitutional boundries for some time now.
Good on the President for pointing that out.
To me it shows his disgust for anything that falls outside of his idealism...as well as a WHOLE LOT OF ARROGANCE to assume he knows better than a team of the best lifelong judges and constitutional lawyers in the entire country.
When his one term is up Obama should move and start his own country taking his loyal followers with him
Yahoo! News
US President Barack Obama on Monday challenged the "unelected" Supreme Court not to take the "extraordinary" and "unprecedented" step of overturning his landmark health reform law.
Obama gonna lose his security blanket or binkey on this one?
at least your not going for the SCARY ANGRY BLACK MAN image.
Guess what , this right wing scotus better pull their shit together and NOT try to piss this country off with their partisan shit.
Common defense is a more often used term in the Constitution. This is a proper use of government involvement. Common good should be determined by a free market economy.
"Promote" the general welfare, "Provide" for the common defense.
Why did the founders use different words to describe the governments role in those 2 areas?
Literary style.
There's very little difference between the intentions of both words.
In any case..the US stopped providing for "Defense" after the last time we were invaded. It's almost "offense" now (WWII being a huge exception).
Which has never ever been a problem for most conservatives.
To me it shows his disgust for anything that falls outside of his idealism...as well as a WHOLE LOT OF ARROGANCE to assume he knows better than a team of the best lifelong judges and constitutional lawyers in the entire country.
Did he? No. What obama is saying is not that he knows that this bill is Constitutional and the Justices don't. What he is saying is that the Justices should find the bill Constitutional because he said so.
..umm..which is what I said. He believes he knows more and if they find otherwise it is judicial activism. That is as arrogant as I have seen a President since Nixon.
