Obama steals a town and gives it to indians

[Desperado]

Again he is over stepping his bounds. He does not have the authority to do this without congressional approval.

Yes, he does have the authority to do it. That's why he did it. It is completely legal.

As far as "completely legal" I will wait until the court cases are heard and there will be court cases. As to why Obama did it..... simply because he thought he could. What is this fool's next project? Giving Manhattan back to the Indians/

 

[Vox]

The entire country belonged to Native Americans at one time. Do you propose some kind of statute of limitations, or should all of it be returned to its "rightful" owners? I would venture to say that most people who live in this town, own property there, were not aware of this possibility when they made their decision. If anything, why not sue the title companies for negligence? That will probably happen, anyway. At some point, we have to draw a line and admit that what was is no longer and move into the future.
If I lived in this town and was getting evicted for this purpose, I guarantee that the "inheritors" would have to like shades of charcoal because I'd see them take razed earth before they took what I earned, or built, or bought in good faith.

I am proposing that the government FINALLY stick to their treaties promised instead of continually shoving them around to make room for non native americans. That town was built on NA land. The town belongs to the NA's. Period. No ands ifs or buts.

There is a huge difference between giving back the entire country and honoring treaties. So obvious I can't understand how people don't see it. But, they are thinking in extremes, without logic, as they usually do. This topic is about honoring legal agreements, treaties. The US government made treaties about land/reservations being set aside for the Native Americans, and the government has broken those legal agreements. As Gracie says, they need to stick to their treaties. It is the US government who is behaving illegally. This is about a legal issue, not about giving back a country that was essentially won in wars and battles with the native population.

Of course. Government ALWAYS behaves ILLEGALLY if it can get away with it. Anywhere. ANY government. It's an axiom.

yet you still worship The Government

 

[Vox]

You first and dont try the debunked Soultrain myth posted up above.

nope, YOU - first a s it is you who stated that there were nobody before Native Americans on this continent.

Link

No you said there where whites here first. Thats why I told you not to show me the failed Soultrain myth. Show me the link or admit your are stupid.

Don't LIE, as usual.

I did not. I said there were people at this continent BEFORE NA. And some of them were white.

Which they were.

But you are ignorant, stupid and a LIAR.

Which is not surprising since you are a leftard as well.

 

[Vox]

nope, YOU - first a s it is you who stated that there were nobody before Native Americans on this continent.

Link

No you said there where whites here first. Thats why I told you not to show me the failed Soultrain myth. Show me the link or admit your are stupid.

It just doesn't matter who was here 13,000 years ago or 9 thousand years ago, or 200 years ago. The land was won in battles and wars. The issue is that treaties were made and should be adhered to. It is a legal issue about treaties. If we tried to return land to people who lived there thousands of years ago, we'd be exchanging land all over the world. The history of mankind is migration, and often those migrations resulted in wars over land.

This is true, but the ignorant leftard has to be shown his ignorance nevertheless.

 

[Vox]

But this was not thousands of years ago. This was 1905. It was their land, given to them in a treaty. Then the nearby towns began to encroach and did indeed encroach.

Solution?

Give the home owners that do not wish to stay, what the property is worth. Those that do want to stay and are allowed to by the elders, come to some kind of terms both parties agree to. The government allowed the encroachment. The government should pay to GET BACK what they ALLOWED to happen.

This will be messy, but if this is what is going down, then those who bought homes should be recompensated...not by the NA's either. And I am thinking the elders of that nation will WANT most to stay because it would be in their best interests. Kinda like mexico..where they have a life estate. Once the home owners pass on...the property reverts back to the owners of the land...the NA's.

all true.

 

[JimBowie1958]

But this was not thousands of years ago. This was 1905. It was their land, given to them in a treaty. Then the nearby towns began to encroach and did indeed encroach.

Solution?

Give the home owners that do not wish to stay, what the property is worth. Those that do want to stay and are allowed to by the elders, come to some kind of terms both parties agree to. The government allowed the encroachment. The government should pay to GET BACK what they ALLOWED to happen.

This will be messy, but if this is what is going down, then those who bought homes should be recompensated...not by the NA's either. And I am thinking the elders of that nation will WANT most to stay because it would be in their best interests. Kinda like mexico..where they have a life estate. Once the home owners pass on...the property reverts back to the owners of the land...the NA's.

all true.

Perhaps, but it still misses a crucial question; where does the EPA get jurisdiction to make a ruling on Amerindian treaty violations and who owns that land?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Riddle me this PALEFACE................

You have stolen my lands, even though my ancestors sold the land for a bottle of Jack Daniels........................You have broken your treaties and built on our lands...........We have lost in the courts but have found a new arrow to RE-INTERPRET TO YOUR LYING LAWS the EPA............A puppet court of the U.S. Gov't PALEFACE.................We will GET OUR LAND BACK.............But unlike you we will let you stay there..............But we will not pay your local taxes or your State Taxes there................On top of that Paleface...........our TRIBE will decide on what taxes you will pay the for allowing you to live on our land..........................

We will build a Casino, and allow you to work there...........The Buffalo will return and a SCREAMING EAGLE called the EPA will show us the way................

lol, you really want to reignite white racism in this country, don't you?

Lol, laugh all you want, but white nationalism is growing by leaps and bounds and it is mostly due to the libtard ideology of Identity Politics that drives it.

 

[Vox]

In the best case scenario the inhabitants of the town should be able to deal directly with the tribe and BOTH sides should kick the government out of the equation altogether.

I highly suspect that property taxes which can be paid directly to the tribe instead of the government and the leases and all other agreements between THE PEOPLE would function much more smoothly when the government is kicked out - as it is the government which is a PARASITE.
And it is the government which always employs the divide and conquer tactic between THE PEOPLE