Mubarak was an appointed dictator who was complicit in the assassination of the former President Sadat and now sets in an Egyptian prison for corruption.
Morsi on the other hand, was a democratically elected president who was ousted in an illegal military coup.
That's the difference between the two Sarge. ..
They both sucked.
I don't disagree with that Mud.
But as a democracy, we should be supporting a democratically elected president.
Not the generals who lead an illegal military coup. ..
For one thing.... We're a Republic, not a democracy.
On Morsi......
What would you think if we elected a president who disbanded the Supreme Court and suspended the Constitution?
Would you think highly of a president of the United States that unilaterally decided that he didn't need to consult with Congress, that he could just rule by decree? And ignored every Judicial decision that went against him? Actually, just ignored the Judicial system altogether
That he could appoint himself Dictator?
Yeah, I know obama thinks that way but he isn't even close to what Morsi was doing. If he tried, OUR Military would remove him, too.
Don't forget, Hitler was democratically appointed to his position and later, democratically won all his elections. Too bad the German Military of the day didn't act against him.
Morsi may have been elected in a democratic process but, as soon as he gained power, he started acting like a ruthless Dictator.
He had to go. The things he did wrong are just simply off the scale.
Criminal charges against Morsi are being prepared as I type
