That was funny, an unbeliever complaining about people playing God. What fracking difference does it make if people play something that does not exist?
ah - "unbeliever"? What in the blue **** could you possibly know about what I believe or unbelieve? You can't even read English. And I don't believe we've ever conversed on religion anyway. I wouldn't do that with someone of your, shall we say, caliber.
To the expression, "playing God" is not something that requires a belief in a deity on the part of either the observer or the observee. The verb is "playing". But I repeat myself about reading comprehension or lack thereof.
The only people I know who are afraid of scientists playing God, are theocons. That is always because they do not know what the **** playing God means. Unless you are a moronic theocon that has been pretending to be a really stupid progressive you would not use the term the same way, so I thought it was funny that you used it the same way. My apologies for crediting you with a higher degree of intelligence than you deserved.
That, dear Pogo, is the proper way to insult someone.
Pfffft. Oh please. Now walk away from the mirror.... nice and slow...
Once again all you do is exhibit your self-enslavement to your own assumptions, which also tells us where they come from. "Theocons"

- yeah that's gonna sell.
To 'play God', for those of you just learning our language, means to assume the dominion of the Life Force, whether such humanoid hubris be declaring someone else's life to be completed, or even worse, proposing to
redesign what Nature hath wrought.
Luddites never think things through, I wonder why he owns a computer if he is so adverse to science.
Again, for those new to English, it's
"averse". And the ass-umption is your'n; I'm not at all averse to science. I am averse to ******* with Nature though, and there's a vast chasm of difference between that and working
within what Nature has bestowed upon us, as in, say, crossbreeding.
Which answers Johnny Corso's point and observes that in his post above he utterly fails to address the issue of the fox minding the hen house, which was my whole point. You'd think a TV detective wouldn't let something that obvious slide right by him.