Fuged those numbers obama to his labor department/
And how are you getting that from that story?
Last paragraph
Looking into the latest Labor Department numbers, there unemployment claims figure while not exactly all that accurate is perhaps the only good news to affect the workforce this week. While the government says that unemployment claims dropped in April, the number of new jobs created is a statistic much smaller than what was hoped for. Economists had expected the creation of around 160,000 new jobs in April but today the Labor Department says that number is closer to 121,000. The underemployment rate also maintains its 14.5 percent figure from March and the transportation, warehousing and construction industries all cut jobs as did the federal government.
Yeah, and? That's not saying the Unemployment rate comes from UI claims. The Labor Dept releases the UI claims every week, the BLS releases the UE rate, and the "new jobs" every month. The article is poorly written and edited, I'll grant you, but nowhere does it say the UE rate comes from UI claims.
And let's look:
Latest UI claims report About halfway down, "PERSONS CLAIMING UI BENEFITS IN ALL PROGRAMS (UNADJUSTED)" we see that the total number of people claiming benefits, Fed and State, is 6,273,624
Now we go to the
Employment Situation (the official UE rate) and see that Unemployed (not seasonally adjustedd) is 11,910,000 (seasonal adjustment raises that up to 12,500,000)
But you're saying the 2 numbers should be the same.
Look too at
Table A-11 where we see "reason for unemployment" as New Entrants, Job Leavers, Reentrants...none of whom would be eligible for UI benefits.
And browse
All the Tables and tell me how all the demographic information, disability, age, race, sex, marital status, veteran status, could come from UI benefits.
You misunderstood. Is it really that hard for you to admit?
Go again to
How the Government Measures Unemployment and read it carefully, where it says why UI benefits aren't used.
Now, for the State and local area data, UI data IS used to supplement the numbers (because the samples are too small at that level) and UI and other admin data from the states are used to adjust and correct, but it's still not true that running out of benefits drops you out of the count. How would that even work with a survey?