g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 131,656
- 75,718
- 2,605
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The claim that the Common Core State Standards have abolished the teaching of literature makes for a great headline. Who wouldnt get hot and bothered over the idea that high school students will no longer be reading Romeo and Juliet, The Crucible, and Invisible Man? I would be up in arms, too. Fortunately, nothing in the standards supports this claim.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=DW0VxxoCrNo
Tell us again Libs how this would not anger you if it was ok to tell your child the wrong answer is right .. I get the explanation part but tell them no try again when they get the CORRECT answer then ask them to explain how they got it.
The speaker provides no evidence for this claim.
Some of these common core opponents came to my town. They are some serious tin foil hat kind of people. Conspiracy theories involving Bill Gates, sooper sekrit societies, etc.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=DW0VxxoCrNo
Tell us again Libs how this would not anger you if it was ok to tell your child the wrong answer is right .. I get the explanation part but tell them no try again when they get the CORRECT answer then ask them to explain how they got it.
Try volunteering at your child's or grandchild's school and you'll see for yourself just how screwed up our education system is getting. The schools near the bigger cities are worse, in my experience. Maybe because there are so many students and many come from the poor neighborhoods. Seems to be a link between undisciplined children and welfare. Coincidence???? When parents aren't involved, it shows! And children do imitate their parents. If children don't have role models who go to work and are productive, then they aren't likely to be productive either.
The outcome based education, now referred to as common core, has been creeping into schools for years now. I believe it started with the Clinton administration. It is about making kids feel good about themselves and no one thought about the long term effects. Making the child feel smarter for getting the wrong answer now means they will fail as adults. How will it go over at the bank when the person can't balance their checkbook and they have to pay overdraft and bounced check fees? Won't feel too good then, will it?
Children are our future and dumbing them down by accepting ignorance isn't going to make the future very bright.
I went with my sister-in-law to my nieces parent teacher conference a few years back. My niece had been having trouble with math and English. She was in 8th grade and reading at a 3rd grade level. The teacher said that if students can read at a 5th grade level by graduation, that would be sufficient. Really?? I don't know how they came to that conclusion, but it was the norm for schools to pass students who really didn't deserve it.
Are we going to keep pretending that it's okay for children not to learn? That no one should tell them they need to get with the program and start paying attention, doing their homework and working to improve? Why is that a bad thing these days? Seems the only things children have to learn is that liberalism is good and everything else is bad. They don't let them slide on that, do they? I've seen some tests given in school where the students are taught that Republicans don't care about people and redistribution of wealth is a good thing.
Indoctrination doesn't require that students become intelligent. It merely seeks to make them obedient.
If you were my patient in a hospital, I would be able to calculate your IV drip rate, you medicine to the nearest nanogram, and count out all your pills for the day. A lot of nurses these days cannot do any of that. We always gave a math question on our tests. Here was my question:
You are a community health nurse. You have an indigent patient who needs medication but has no insurance. The doctors order reads: Zyprexa 20mg by mouth every night. You have on hand samples of Zyprexa the pharm rep left last visit. Each bottle contains 7 ten milligram pills. It takes 28 days to get the patient on Tenncare. How many bottles will you give him to last until he has insurance. They would turn in two pages of equations and still have the wrong answer.
Another. Doctors order says: Haldol Decanoate 150mg IM every 4 weeks. You have on hand Haldol Decanoate in 100mg/1ml vials. How many ml do you give the patient IM every 4 weeks? I can figure these in my head. But your nurse likely will not be able to solve either one of them.
Scary isn't it?
I didn't read any further in the thread. Is the answer to the first problem: the patient would need a total of 56 10mg pills, so 8 bottles total would be needed?
I have no clue on the second question ... I don't even know what IM stands for.
Don't they teach how to do these types of things in nursing school? Yeah, in addition to what you'd learn in school in general ... but with ml and IM and all ... don't they teach that?
You don't need to know that IM stands for intramuscular, all you need to do is figure out that 1.5 ml is equal to 150 mg.
this is probably how Dumbocrats figure their budgets....
nothing wrong with creative/critical thinking....and this was a great example....
but getting the right numbers is also critical....
It is unfortunate Critical Thinking is not part of our education system. The lack of it definitely shows around here.
Personally, I have a fairly literal way of understanding things.
I like to be able to visualise something in my head.
If I can work out a way of seeing in my minds eye how an equation works then I can understand it.
Something like quantum mechanics will probably always be a mystery to me because I can't visualise how it works.
If you were my patient in a hospital, I would be able to calculate your IV drip rate, you medicine to the nearest nanogram, and count out all your pills for the day. A lot of nurses these days cannot do any of that. We always gave a math question on our tests. Here was my question:
You are a community health nurse. You have an indigent patient who needs medication but has no insurance. You have on hand samples of Zyprexa the pharm rep left last visit. Each bottle contains 7 ten milligram pills. It takes 28 days to get the patient on Tenncare. How many bottles will you give him to last until he has insurance. They would turn in two pages of equations and still have the wrong answer.
Another. Doctors order says: Haldol Decanoate 150mg IM every 4 weeks. You have on hand Haldol Decanoate in 100mg/1ml vials. How many ml do you give the patient IM every 4 weeks? I can figure these in my head. But your nurse likely will not be able to solve either one of them.
Scary isn't it?
It's a shame alright.
The greatest risk, as I see it, is relying so much on mathemalculating machines that the operator can't even see if an answer is reasonable or not.
Mind you, I can't get the answer to the first problem Sunshine.
Is there something missing...do I need to know the dosage or is that something a nurse would just know?
I didn't read any further in the thread. Is the answer to the first problem: the patient would need a total of 56 10mg pills, so 8 bottles total would be needed?
I have no clue on the second question ... I don't even know what IM stands for.
Don't they teach how to do these types of things in nursing school? Yeah, in addition to what you'd learn in school in general ... but with ml and IM and all ... don't they teach that?
You don't need to know that IM stands for intramuscular, all you need to do is figure out that 1.5 ml is equal to 150 mg.
They tried to teach us metric when I was in 5th grade, eons ago. Uh, no. I don't do metric.