..."...And lest we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ."...
Yes, Mister President, except...
1. the Crusades happened the better part of a thousand years ago, whereas Islam is doing this today, during our very lifetimes
2. the Inquisition happened half a thousand years ago, whereas Islam is doing this today, during our very lifetimes
3. when Christians did those things so many centuries ago, they did so in direct
violation of the teachings of
their Founder, whereas when the Muslims do this today, they do it in
obedience to the teachings of
their Founder.
Apples and oranges, Mister President.
Oh, and, by the way... are you not supposed to be one of us? So why are you giving aid and comfort to the enemy?
I could find you plenty of Bible Quotes that call for beheadings, guy. So saying that this is against the teachings of Jesus are kind of silly.
Judges 7:25
And they took two princes of the Midianites, Oreb and Zeeb ... and brought the heads of Oreb and Zeeb to Gideon....
1 Samuel 17:57
And as David returned from the slaughter of the Philistine, ... [he] brought ... the head of the Philistine in his hand.
2 Samuel 4:7-8
And they smote him, and slew him, and beheaded him, and took his head ... brought the head of Ishbosheth unto David....
2 Samuel 20:22
And they cut off the head of Sheba the son of Bichri, and cast it out to Joab.
2 Kings 10:7-8
[T]hey took the king's sons, and slew seventy persons, and put their heads in baskets, and sent him them to Jezreel. And there came a messenger, and told him, saying, They have brought the heads of the king's sons. And he said, Lay ye them in two heaps at the entering in of the gate until the morning.
Yes, yes, yes...
Apologists for Radical Islam, and Uber-Liberals - committed to religious egalitarianism despite the savage nature of the alien belief system - always drag-out the violence inherent in the Old Testament, to try and equate Islamic dogma and philosophy with Christian dogma and philosophy...
Here's the problem with that...
The New Testament overrides and supercedes the Old...
Any teachings of Jesus of Nazareth override and supercede conflicting teachings in the Old Testament...
If the Prophet DumAzzKiel from ancient times says that it's OK to spit your enemy's babies on barbeque skewers and eat them with fava beans and a nice chianti...
And if Jesus of Nazareth says that you should "Turn the other cheek" and "Love thy neighbor", then...
Your enemy's babies are safe, after all, because the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth override those of the Old Testament...
Now, mind you, over the centuries, a very great and repeated slaughter has been perpetrated by Christians, in various parts of the domains of Old Christendom...
But, here's the thing...
When Christians slaughtered in the name of God, they did so in obedience-to or in agreement-with Christian clerics and/or Christian royalty who were covering their asses with such concepts as "Just War" and "Defense of the Faith"...
And those concepts - and the actions and great slaughters committed under the aegis of those concepts - were in
direct violation of the basic teachings of Jesus of Nazareth - namely: "Turn the other cheek" and "Love thy neighbor".
In effect, churchmen and temporal rulers had devised Juicy Rationalizations to circumvent the unmistakable prohibitions against violence and the unmistakable enjoinders to love, for which Jesus of Nazareth is famed and respected and even worshiped, and which he served-up without caveats or conditions or exceptions during his ministry.
Jesus of Nazareth did not say "Turn the other cheek, unless the other guy is making war on you" nor did he say "Love thy neighbor, unless he is making war on you" nor did he say "Suffer the little children to come unto me, unless they belong to a different tribe or race or religion" - rather, his injunctions are perceived as universal and unconditional.
The great violence committed by Christianity in centuries long-past was the result of mortal and fallible men, misleading others away from those Core Teachings of Jesus.
The Old Testament is there as historical backdrop and as continuity with the monotheistic heritage of Jesus and as metaphorical Morality Play and as a collection of lessons in what to do and what not to do, and as a catch-all bucket for anything not covered by the teachings of Jesus and the writings of the superceding New Testament.
If the subject matter is explicitly or (reasonably) implicitly covered in the New Testament, then the teachings of the New Testament supercede and control.
If the subject matter is not covered in the New Testament, then the teachings of the Old Testament control.
The Core Teachings of Jesus of Nazareth prohibit violence and warfare of any kind, under any circumstances.
Leaving the warfare and head-taking and baby-skewering of the Old Testament as historical narrative and backdrop, rather than as permission for others to do the same.
Islam, on the other hand, is absolutely saturated with Permissions to Wage War and to commit Violence Against Unbelievers - supposedly, the Word of God himself, as revealed to Muhammed.
Clearly, the Islamic vision of the godhead is a bloodier and more violent vision that that offered to Mankind by Jesus of Nazareth.
Equally clearly, the Founder of Islam was a being of far commoner clay and far more violent than the Founder of Christianity.
It is failure to make and understand and apply these differences, which allows faux equivalences between Islam and Christianity.
But... amongst those who perceive and understand these differences... the far more savage and brutal nature of the Core Teachings of Islam come into a clear focus.
Obumble - the Failed Messiah - is a high-profile purveyor of the falsehood inherent in such faux equivalencies.