* * * *
Yes, the first error was at the airport in yemen. He was on a list. The pantybombers name was misspelled when checked, and thus did not come up on a list. Your partisan bullshit shows clearly here.
The "spelling" of the ******'s name was not the problem. There are lots of alternative ways to "spell" Arabic names in English or Dutch, you retard. It is entirely
your partisan bullshit which is on full display.
About as based as your claim of the event being terrorists because you are racist against arab and muslim peoples?
See how retarded you are? Laughable. YOU, ya fuckin' putz, made the initial contention. YOU assumed a burden in the process. You ducked it because you have nothing to back it up. What we already know about the terrorist Lt. suffices more than adequately to valdiate my denial of your baseless contention. And I reject your transparent burden shifting anyway. Moreover, your false claim about me supposedly being at all "racist" is rejcted because it is clear that you are wildly lashing out now that your partisan dishonesty is getting exposed. You are unable to back up that tawdry cheap dumbass dishonest effort of yours, either, ya scumbag.
There is no proof, and there never has been. The bible is not a factual book, despite what you've been told by some guy who believe just because you read them makes them true.... Therefore it is open to serious doubt. There is just a widely pompous belief that if you don't believe in him you'll burn for eternity. Thus is the existence of christianity, people to scared to think for themselves.
It is largely a recordation of eyewitness accounts. You can reject the Bible in whole or in part. Nobody gives a shit about your beliefs one way or the other. I am merely pointing out (correctly) that your factual assertion has no merit. It doesn't. You are ignorant. It's no big deal. We kinda already see how ignorant you are.
Both of you need to seriously check your opinions. Nothing I've read has anything more to do that rooting for your own party. Set the tone? What kind of bullshit is that? Just like bush set the economical tone? That is a bullshit statement and I'd never use it.
No, asswipe. You need to "check" your vitriolic partisan crap. You should also edit the gibberish you submit without bothering to proof-read.
And yes, the President DOES set the tone. It's HIS Administration, you moron. When HE and his spokes-imbeciles declare that "terrorism" is not "terrorism" but is instead a "man-made disaster" there are reasons for using such stupid euphemisms and there are consequences which sadly flow from his willingness to do so. When the idiot-in-chief has a scumbag Attorney General who actually suggests that captured enemy combatants should get "
Miranda" warnings, there are consquences for THAT kind of glaring stupidity, too; and it is another function of the tone set by the imbecile-in-chief.
Nobody cares that you'd 'never use' the rhetorical tool of discussing the tone set by the President. You are stupid. What you would or wouldn't "use" is thus of no particular interest.
