Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

[buckeye]

Basically all you’re whining about is whether the assessment that Russia helped Trump was high confidence or moderate confidence.

That’s treason? Jesus.

No, goofball. What happened after that fake ICA? What was that ICA used as a basis for?

 

[Marener]

No, goofball. What happened after that fake ICA? What was that ICA used as a basis for?

The ICA wasn’t fake. Everything in the ICA was borne out to be true.

Russia interfered in the election to help Trump and hurt Clinton.

Obama wanted that information out before Trump took office because he suspected, wisely, that Trump would try to bury it and the people had a right to know.

That’s Obama’s right and duty as president of the United States. Cry harder.

 

[Mac-7]

You’re a useful idiot. It doesn’t matter what happens next because you’re already accepting the narrative.

I’m not a blowhard lib who knows everything

When trump was reelected all the dirty secrets linked to obama were no longer beyond reach

Slowly the trump team - and yes this is a team effort, not just trump flying solo - is gathering the facts

Three years is a long time for Team Obama to play Dodge Ball without getting nailed

And I am patient

 

[Marener]

I’m not a blowhard lib who knows everything

When trump was reelected all the dirty secrets linked to obama were no longer beyond reach

Slowly the trump team - and yes this is a team effort, not just trump flying sole - is gathering the facts

Three years us a long time for Team Obama to play Dodge Ball without getting nailed

And I am patient

It’s just recycled garbage. All this available under his first administration but the garbage peddlers pulled it out, dusted it off and convinced you of a scandal all over again.

You don’t know anything. That’s the problem.

 

[buckeye]

The ICA wasn’t fake. Everything in the ICA was borne out to be true.

Yet now we know that the original ICA never said that Putin wanted Trump. It said Russia showed no preference, just wanted to cause chaos and disorganization and was pulled just before publication and Obama ordered a new one written .

Why did Obama do that?

Then we have this:

On December 9th, 2016, a National Security Council meeting was called to gather President Obama’s senior national security officials, which included CIA Director Brennan, then-Obama DNI James Clapper, Susan Rice, and others. Following that secret meeting, DNI Clapper’s assistant sent an email to the intelligence community with the subject line, “POTUS tasking on Russia election meddling,” tasking ODNI leaders to create a new assessment per the president’s request.
The House Intelligence Committee oversight report that we released today reveals that, “unlike routine intelligence community analysis, the intelligence community assessment was a high profile product ordered by the president, President Obama.

It directed senior intelligence community agency heads and created an intelligence community assessment limited to just five analysts using one principal drafter.”

This is not something that occurs in the normal path of producing an intelligence community assessment that reflects the views across the intelligence community. The production of this intelligence community assessment was subject to unusual directives directly from the president and senior political appointees, especially the former director of the CIA, John Brennan.

https://singjupost.com/transcript-tulsi-gabbard-remarks-on-russia-hoax-from-the-white-house/

So why is Obama withdrawing an ICA at the last second, ordering a new one be written and limiting it's writing to just a few people instead of the collaborative report that was the routine?

 

[buckeye]

Russia interfered in the election to help Trump and hurt Clinton.

Why didn't Putin release the dirt on Hillary that he had? He knew she was psycho and had bribed religious leaders to support her. Why didn't he tell the world this if he wanted Trump to win?

And why did Putin publicly support Trump? Do you think that was designed to help Trump?

 

[Robert W]

You mean like directing Bondi to change her mind about whether the client list was on her desk?

The client list is not what she said was on her desk
She had the file that had no list.

 

[whitehall]

Trump expost facto disagreeing with the assessments of the 2016 intel team doesn't magically transform that assessment into a capital crime.

Or any crime.

Trump insisting that if he disagrees with the 2016 intel team that Trump can EXECUTE the 2016 intel team is nonsense. Its just red meat for the MAGA faithful, to try and distract them from Trump's suppression of the Epstein list.

It's enough for an indictment. God only knows the prosecution bar was set low during Trump's first term. Nobody really expected Hussein to be perp walked into federal prison but all those fools who were "just following orders" can be prosecuted unless they were on old Joe's autopen pardon list.

 

[buckeye]

Everything in the ICA was borne out to be true.

Why do you run from my question about Obama's fake ICA?

What was the fake ICA used as a basis for?

 

[Marener]

Yet now we know that the original ICA never said that Putin wanted Trump. It said Russia showed no preference, just wanted to cause chaos and disorganization and was pulled just before publication and Obama ordered a new one written

Yes, the analysts were afraid the Republicans would be upset by that.

But it turned out to be true, confirmed in Senate and Mueller investigations.

Russia sought to degrade Clinton’s candidacy, not Trump’s. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out their preference.

 

[Marener]

Why do you run from my question about Obama's fake ICA?

What was the fake ICA used as a basis for?

I don’t know what it was the “basis for”. As far as I’m aware, it wasn’t the basis for anything because Trump took office shortly after.

I don’t know what you’re thinking. You’re obviously not asking a legitimate question since you clearly have an answer in mind. Instead of engaging in pointless questions, just tell me what you’re thinking.

 

[Marener]

Why didn't Putin release the dirt on Hillary that he had? He knew she was psycho and had bribed religious leaders to support her. Why didn't he tell the world this if he wanted Trump to win?

Because it’s insane and no one would believe it.

 

[buckeye]

Yes, the analysts were afraid the Republicans would be upset by that.

The analysts intentionally left out the Russian preference for Trump in their first assessment because they didn't want to upset republicans?

You're speaking from your ass. Link your proof or admit its from your ass and full of shit.

 

[buckeye]

But it turned out to be true, confirmed in Senate and Mueller investigations.

And contradicted by the original ICA that was scrapped by Obama and Co.

BTW, the House investigation didn't find that the Russians preferred Trump.

 

[buckeye]

Russia sought to degrade Clinton’s candidacy, not Trump’s. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out their preference.

Yet you cannot explain why the Russians refused to publicize information about Hillary being the psycho that anyone with a brain already knew was true and her bribing religious leaders to support her. Why did Putin publicly say he supported Trump? Do you think that helped trump or the psycho, Hillary?

No wondering why you run from this stuff, mariner. You seem like a partisan hack in a cult.

 

[buckeye]

don’t know what it was the “basis for”. As far as I’m aware, it wasn’t the basis for anything because Trump took office shortly after.

And what happened that sucked the air out of his presidency from the get go and went on to cost the American taxpayer 40 million dollars and found Trump innocent of collusion with the Russians?

You really aren't too smart.

 

[Lisa558]

I suppose you intend to keep telling yourself that until the orange fool needs another new distraction. Your current conspiracy theory has been active for a long time.

^^^ amazing that says this after the Dems perpetuated the biggest hoax on a political opponent in history - and Obama knew about it.

 

[buckeye]

Because it’s insane and no one would believe it.

Noone would believe an email from the DNC hacked emails saying that Hillary had bribed religious leaders and was a psycho?

lol Why don't you believe your own leaders?

 

[Marener]

Noone would believe an email from the DNC hacked emails saying that Hillary had bribed religious leaders and was a psycho?

lol Why don't you believe your own leaders?

Where is this email, exactly? Have you seen it?

 

[Marener]

And what happened that sucked the air out of his presidency from the get go and went on to cost the American taxpayer 40 million dollars and found Trump innocent of collusion with the Russians?

You really aren't too smart.

Cry harder.

40 million well spent so that the American people could know what happened in our election from someone we can trust.

How much money is Bondi going to waste trying to invent a crime to prosecute? Then add that the money Durham wasted to do the exact same thing.

The investigation into Russian interference was going on well before the ICA. It wasn’t the basis of anything.