Obama Budget Would Add Another $9.3 Trillion to the Debt

i would imagine that back in cavemen years, those banks had animals and females in their vaults, till they finally invented money in 78,832 BC.
maybe its just me but having females in the vault could have saved a couple transactions and a bit of time.
well back in those days, female cavewomen were the equivalent of about $5.000.00,,,even more than gold,,,,,6000.00 if their breasts were more than 35ddd
I know. I have friends that constantly tell me Im old enough to remember these things first hand.
oh the good old days..
gee,. i wonder what the fine was back then for the cavemen who ran a light and took out a dinasour.
 
again with the ignorance of debt.

depending on the BUDGET DEFICIT determines how much $$ is added to the NATIONAL DEBT.


RW's will never be able to figure that one out.
 
i would imagine that back in cavemen years, those banks had animals and females in their vaults, till they finally invented money in 78,832 BC.
maybe its just me but having females in the vault could have saved a couple transactions and a bit of time.
well back in those days, female cavewomen were the equivalent of about $5.000.00,,,even more than gold,,,,,6000.00 if their breasts were more than 35ddd
I know. I have friends that constantly tell me Im old enough to remember these things first hand.
oh the good old days..
gee,. i wonder what the fine was back then for the cavemen who ran a light and took out a dinasour.
he got put in the bank vault for the "next use"
 
We don't need to be spending $4.1 trillion dollars to fund the filthy ass Federal government every year. It will cause significant problems for this country. The economy is not strong enough to absorb that loss in the private sector to be transferred to the government.
There is no loss to the private sector as you admit the money taken in by the government is SPENT, not stashed in offshore in tax free bank accounts like the private sector tax dodgers do which does create a loss in the private sector.
You mean the money taken in is WASTED on entitlement programs. Perhaps we should do away with the private sector altogether - let's see then how well your precious, huge, unaccountable, and bankrupt government operates then.
 
i would imagine that back in cavemen years, those banks had animals and females in their vaults, till they finally invented money in 78,832 BC.
maybe its just me but having females in the vault could have saved a couple transactions and a bit of time.
well back in those days, female cavewomen were the equivalent of about $5.000.00,,,even more than gold,,,,,6000.00 if their breasts were more than 35ddd
I know. I have friends that constantly tell me Im old enough to remember these things first hand.
oh the good old days..
gee,. i wonder what the fine was back then for the cavemen who ran a light and took out a dinasour.
he got put in the bank vault for the "next use"
so I wonder how far 20 Trillion singles will reach out in space,,,,,god,,remember when it was 14 trillion and the dollars would pass Uranus?
 
There is no loss to the private sector as you admit the money taken in by the government is SPENT, not stashed in offshore in tax free bank accounts like the private sector tax dodgers do which does create a loss in the private sector.

You are confused about economics as are most Libtards.

When you spend the money you earn you spend in a way to meet your needs. That creates an efficient economy that results in a stronger economy.

If you give the money you earn to a filthy ass corrupt stupid politician (like Obama) it will be spent on paying back the special interest that elected the politician with the tremendous government overhead on top of it. You get screwed and so do the people that would have benefited from you spending the money with them.

That economic concept is explained in The Broken Window Fallacy.

Here is a video explaining it. Take notes because I will quiz you later.

 
again with the ignorance of debt.

depending on the BUDGET DEFICIT determines how much $$ is added to the NATIONAL DEBT.


RW's will never be able to figure that one out.
We owe more than we take in. And we owe a shitload. Leftists will never be able to figure that one out. As long as they get their "entitlements", they just don't give a shit.
 
maybe its just me but having females in the vault could have saved a couple transactions and a bit of time.
well back in those days, female cavewomen were the equivalent of about $5.000.00,,,even more than gold,,,,,6000.00 if their breasts were more than 35ddd
I know. I have friends that constantly tell me Im old enough to remember these things first hand.
oh the good old days..
gee,. i wonder what the fine was back then for the cavemen who ran a light and took out a dinasour.
he got put in the bank vault for the "next use"
so I wonder how far 20 Trillion singles will reach out in space,,,,,god,,remember when it was 14 trillion and the dollars would pass Uranus?
if they would have been that close to myanus I damn sure would have grabbed a few trillion
 
There is no loss to the private sector as you admit the money taken in by the government is SPENT, not stashed in offshore in tax free bank accounts like the private sector tax dodgers do which does create a loss in the private sector.

You are confused about economics as are most Libtards.

When you spend the money you earn you spend in a way to meet your needs. That creates an efficient economy that results in a stronger economy.

If you give the money you earn to a filthy ass corrupt stupid politician (like Obama) it will be spent on paying back the special interest that elected the politician with the tremendous government overhead on top of it. You get screwed and so do the people that would have benefited from you spending the money with them.

That economic concept is explained in The Broken Window Fallacy.

Here is a video explaining it. Take notes because I will quiz you later.


Well you already failed, your stupid video does not address the tax dodgers moving money offshore that the government would spend here even if they are special interests.

This is the problem with know-it-all Right-wingers, they can't even figure out what is happening yet they have convinced themselves that they are smarter than everyone else in explaining what they don'y understand in the first place. :cuckoo:
 
Let me ask . What do you think a republican candidate budget would look like ?

Or you think building a wall along Mexico , rounding up all illegals into camps , and expanding the military would fly with a balanced budget ! Lol!!!
 
I'm just amazed anyone is giving credence to the CBO's estimate. When was the last time they got even close?

Probably be closer to 20 trillion, than 10 by the time all's said.
 
[

Well you already failed, your stupid video does not address the tax dodgers moving money offshore that the government would spend here even if they are special interests.

This is the problem with know-it-all Right-wingers, they can't even figure out what is happening yet they have convinced themselves that they are smarter than everyone else in explaining what they don'y understand in the first place. :cuckoo:

You need to talk to Johnson Controls about the subject.

A couple of weeks ago they announced they are moving out of the country because the taxation rate is so high in this fucking country.

There have been many other companies move out of the country because of a hostile business environment that you stupid socialist have inflicted.

You Libtads have no idea of the damage your big government does to this country. It would be nice if you Moon Bats would take a course in economics every once in awhile.

Your Boy Obama with his big government mentality has increased poverty, decreased family income, increased the spread between the rich and the poor, increased the number of shitheads on welfare and really, really, really increased the debt.
 
again with the ignorance of debt.

depending on the BUDGET DEFICIT determines how much $$ is added to the NATIONAL DEBT.


RW's will never be able to figure that one out.
We owe more than we take in. And we owe a shitload. Leftists will never be able to figure that one out. As long as they get their "entitlements", they just don't give a shit.


a yearly federal budget has nothing to do with national debt ... moron.
 
There is no loss to the private sector as you admit the money taken in by the government is SPENT, not stashed in offshore in tax free bank accounts like the private sector tax dodgers do which does create a loss in the private sector.

You are confused about economics as are most Libtards.

When you spend the money you earn you spend in a way to meet your needs. That creates an efficient economy that results in a stronger economy.

If you give the money you earn to a filthy ass corrupt stupid politician (like Obama) it will be spent on paying back the special interest that elected the politician with the tremendous government overhead on top of it. You get screwed and so do the people that would have benefited from you spending the money with them.

That economic concept is explained in The Broken Window Fallacy.

Here is a video explaining it. Take notes because I will quiz you later.


Well you already failed, your stupid video does not address the tax dodgers moving money offshore that the government would spend here even if they are special interests.

This is the problem with know-it-all Right-wingers, they can't even figure out what is happening yet they have convinced themselves that they are smarter than everyone else in explaining what they don'y understand in the first place. :cuckoo:


We're not dodging. We're obeying the law...as written.

You seem to forget, it's our money. Not yours.
 
again with the ignorance of debt.

depending on the BUDGET DEFICIT determines how much $$ is added to the NATIONAL DEBT.


RW's will never be able to figure that one out.
We owe more than we take in. And we owe a shitload. Leftists will never be able to figure that one out. As long as they get their "entitlements", they just don't give a shit.


a yearly federal budget has nothing to do with national debt ... moron.

Who's the moron. One who thinks deficit = debt? Or one who knows better.
 
again with the ignorance of debt.

depending on the BUDGET DEFICIT determines how much $$ is added to the NATIONAL DEBT.


RW's will never be able to figure that one out.
We owe more than we take in. And we owe a shitload. Leftists will never be able to figure that one out. As long as they get their "entitlements", they just don't give a shit.


a yearly federal budget has nothing to do with national debt ... moron.

Who's the moron. One who thinks deficit = debt? Or one who knows better.

I know better, and explain the difference almost daily to RW morons.
 
again with the ignorance of debt.

depending on the BUDGET DEFICIT determines how much $$ is added to the NATIONAL DEBT.


RW's will never be able to figure that one out.
We owe more than we take in. And we owe a shitload. Leftists will never be able to figure that one out. As long as they get their "entitlements", they just don't give a shit.


a yearly federal budget has nothing to do with national debt ... moron.

Who's the moron. One who thinks deficit = debt? Or one who knows better.

I know better, and explain the difference almost daily to RW morons.

Well let's see if you do know. What was the last year the US government ran an actual surplus?
 
Obama has less than a year left . How can he affect future debt 10 years out??

Unless your saying a prior presidents actions can burden the next guys budgets!?!?

It's been fun to call out liberals the past several years every time you all scream for "BOOOOSH," but these cino morons are already setting themselves to be slammed with "Wabama! :crybaby:"
 

Forum List

Back
Top