Obama-appointee judge releases illegal immigrants who have violent rap sheets

[Mac-7]

The judge isn’t preventing DHS from sending them to a third country.

DHS hasn’t gotten a third country to accept them.

Your link is garbage and you didn’t read the decision.

Lib judges absolutely have been blocking deportations to 3rd countries

judge rules against sending illegal aliens to 3rd countries at DuckDuckGo

DuckDuckGo. Privacy, Simplified.

duckduckgo.com

 

[Mac-7]

The judge isn’t preventing DHS from sending them to a third country.

DHS hasn’t gotten a third country to accept them.

Your link is garbage and you didn’t read the decision.

Link?

 

[Marener]

Lib judges absolutely have been blocking deportations to 3rd countries

judge rules against sending illegal aliens to 3rd countries at DuckDuckGo

DuckDuckGo. Privacy, Simplified.

duckduckgo.com

Has nothing to do with this case. Stop bringing up irrelevant AI slop.

Link?

It’s in the decision that I already provided. Why didn’t you read it?

 

[Mac-7]

Has nothing to do with this case. Stop bringing up irrelevant AI slop.



It’s in the decision that I already provided. Why didn’t you read it?

Your link does not admit why the four have not been deported yet

All you can say is that DHS is incompetent when the fact is that DHS has bern blocked from sending them to a 3rd country

 

[Marener]

Your link does not admit why the four have not been deported yet

All you can say is that DHS is incompetent when the fact is that DHS has bern blocked from sending them to a 3rd country

My link absolutely does say why they haven’t been deported yet. Admittedly, it’s about 3/4th of the way to the end which is maybe why you didn’t see it.

When did you post any facts?

 

[Mac-7]

My link absolutely does say why they haven’t been deported yet. Admittedly, it’s about 3/4th of the way to the end which is maybe why you didn’t see it.

When did you post any facts?

We all understand that

DHS is prevented from deporting them to a 3rd country till the question is settled by the SC

Releasing these monsters back into the public is an act of insanity

 

[Marener]

We all understand that

DHS is prevented from deporting them to a 3rd country till the question is settled by the SC

Releasing these monsters back into the public is an act of insanity

Nothing needs to be settled by the SC. The Trump administration hasn’t found a third country willing to accept them.

Do you think the government can lock these men up indefinitely? For the rest of their lives?

 

[Mac-7]

Nothing needs to be settled by the SC. The Trump administration hasn’t found a third country willing to accept them.

Do you think the government can lock these men up indefinitely? For the rest of their lives?

Can you document that?

I think you are mistaken

 

[Marener]

Can you document that?

I think you are mistaken

It’s in the decision that I already linked. It’s explained in a lot of detail.

Didn’t you read it?

 

[Mac-7]

It’s in the decision that I already linked. It’s explained in a lot of detail.

Didn’t you read it?

No it isnt

 

[Marener]

No it isnt

Did you read it?

 

[Mac-7]

It’s in the decision that I already linked. It’s explained in a lot of detail.

Didn’t you read it?

If you read it then you know where to look

“Go read it” is not an argument

 

[Marener]

If you read it then you know where to look

“Go read it” is not an argument

Yeah, I’ve read it. Starting on about page 30 it goes into detail about what country they’re tried to send them to and why that hasn’t happened.

Again, a question which you refuse to answer. Did you read it?

 

[Mac-7]

Yeah, I’ve read it. Starting on about page 30 it goes into detail about what country they’re tried to send them to and why that hasn’t happened.

Again, a question which you refuse to answer. Did you read it?

No I didnt

But you havent presented it either

 

[Marener]

No I didnt

But you havent presented it either

I provided a link to the decision.

When you said this:

Your link does not admit why the four have not been deported yet

It was dishonest because you’re making a claim about a link you admitted that you didn’t read.

What more do you need me to do? Come over there and read it aloud to you? If you won’t read the decision, then at least stop making claims about what is in it.