HappyJoy
Platinum Member
- Apr 15, 2015
- 32,056
- 5,943
- 1,140
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #41
What you want is to use somebody else's product for free.
I don't want anything. YOU selected a site with a paywall then told me to read it. They wrote the article which they want me to read then said that just to see it to see if it is anything I am interested in, I have to pay first. Most sites are free, others ask you to subscribe (no charge), others let you read for free a number of times BEFORE they ask you to pay.
I believe you get so many views for free per month, I didn't have to deal with a paywall. Just the same I posted the contents of most of the article. Not sure why you're so bent out of shape except that you obviously don't want to read about what a sham OAN is.
I can just go to OANN if I want. What they choose to do to avoid costly potential litigation has no reflection on the veracity of their story.
Actually it does. It tells me they don't have the confidence to be able to defend their lying asses in court.
Or just want to avoid costly litigation. People in the right lose cases all the time.
So a "news" organization should remove it's own articles about the very important topic of voter fraud from it's own viewers because it can't afford the litigation? That's not a news source I would trust.
Don't. Maybe they took down one article to put up an even better more damning one about Dominion! OANN is far better than any of your far left crazy sites! No one cares what you "trust."
If you do a search for Dominion on OAN's site now you get only 6 stories. None of them appear to be directly about election fraud.
Maybe you're not too bright.