Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 43,977
- 30,474
- 2,545
New York Times plagiarism consultant Jonathan Bailey released his “full analysis” of the allegations against Vice President Kamala Harris and found them “more serious” than he initially believed.
“At the time, I was unaware of a full dossier with additional allegations, which led some to accuse the New York Times of withholding that information from me. However, the article clearly stated that it was my ‘initial reaction’ to those allegations, not a complete analysis,” Bailey wrote on Plagiarism Today Wednesday. “Today, I reviewed the complete dossier prepared by Dr. Stefan Weber, whom I have covered before. I also performed a peer review of one of his papers in 2018.”
“With this new information, while I believe the case is more serious than I commented to the New York Times.
nypost.com
BJ-
What is with Democrats and their desire/need to copy the works of others?
It is weird, sloppy, and insulting.
“At the time, I was unaware of a full dossier with additional allegations, which led some to accuse the New York Times of withholding that information from me. However, the article clearly stated that it was my ‘initial reaction’ to those allegations, not a complete analysis,” Bailey wrote on Plagiarism Today Wednesday. “Today, I reviewed the complete dossier prepared by Dr. Stefan Weber, whom I have covered before. I also performed a peer review of one of his papers in 2018.”
“With this new information, while I believe the case is more serious than I commented to the New York Times.

NYT plagiarism consultant admits Kamala Harris scandal ‘more serious’ than he thought
New York Times’ plagiarism consultant Jonathan Bailey released his “full analysis” of the allegations against Vice President Kamala Harris and found them “more serious” than…

BJ-
What is with Democrats and their desire/need to copy the works of others?
It is weird, sloppy, and insulting.