NYT bombshell: Trump sons cash in on $1.6 billion federal mining deal

Oh, my mistake. Of course Trump's kids are universally noted as experts in the mineral extraction business whose knowledge and history is well known the world over.

Right?

Oh wait.
They are investors who never claimed to be industrialists
 
So it's legal for the president's kids to take money for businesses and then get them government favors through their dad?

Just checking.
What government favors were given? Please be specific. Please be specific. BTW, why were you unconcerned when Hunter Biden was given a job in Ukraine in exchange for gov't favors. How about '10% for the big guy?'
 
What law did they break?

So, you're asserting that it is legal (and apparantly ethical) for a sitting US President to direct taxpayer funds to subsidize his son's business interests!
 
They are investors who never claimed to be industrialists

They're not investors. They are leeches.

You are paying them to manage a mining interest for which they have no background, contacts or experience with.

But they will do what their brother in law does. Take their "management fees" off the top and walk away with your money.
 
What government favors were given? Please be specific. Please be specific. BTW, why were you unconcerned when Hunter Biden was given a job in Ukraine in exchange for gov't favors. How about '10% for the big guy?'
Read the article. Or do you need someone to read it to you?
 
Oh, my mistake. Of course Trump's kids are universally noted as experts in the mineral extraction business whose knowledge and history is well known the world over.

Right?

Oh wait.
Are you an expert in everything you are invested in, assuming you are invested in anything. I am invested in Microsoft but I wouldn't even be considered a novice in technology. Try again. REEEEEEEEEE
 
Are you an expert in everything you are invested in, assuming you are invested in anything. I am invested in Microsoft but I wouldn't even be considered a novice in technology. Try again. REEEEEEEEEE
During the call, Mr. Trump and his team won an agreement from the Kazakh leader to give a little-known American company access to one of the world’s largest untapped reserves of tungsten, a metal that the United States desperately needs for the production of missile warheads, fighter jets, computer chips and other critical goods.
 
So, you're asserting that it is legal (and apparantly ethical) for a sitting US President to direct taxpayer funds to subsidize his son's business interests!
How about you stop deflecting and answer the question
 
Oh, my mistake. Of course Trump's kids are universally noted as experts in the mineral extraction business whose knowledge and history is well known the world over.

Right?

Oh wait.
Who claimed that? All they did was invest in a company, they didn’t claim to be experts on his to get minerals out or say they shoukd be on the b board of directors

Try again
 
During the call, Mr. Trump and his team won an agreement from the Kazakh leader to give a little-known American company access to one of the world’s largest untapped reserves of tungsten, a metal that the United States desperately needs for the production of missile warheads, fighter jets, computer chips and other critical goods.
You have not cited one violation of law. You also have not cited any source beyond 'the NYT reported.' BTW, they didn't support their article with sources either.
 
You have not cited one violation of law. You also have not cited any source beyond 'the NYT reported.' BTW, they didn't support their article with sources either.
All they have is deflection and projection....this is the party that protected "pardon me" Hunter biden
 
You have not cited one violation of law. You also have not cited any source beyond 'the NYT reported.' BTW, they didn't support their article with sources either.
Again, you think it’s fine for Trump to use the government to enrich is family.
 
Again, you think it’s fine for Trump to use the government to enrich is family.
when did he do that? and when are you going to provide us with this law that was violated?

Is it your claim that the President's family is not allowed to have a business? When did you come to this conclusion?
 
15th post
Obviously you didn't read the article. That is why you---like the article are short on specifics and sources. The article cites NO SOURCES. The NYT reported---. SMH. REEEEEE.

The New York Times is far more accurate and reliable than any media cited by Trump humpers (admittedly a very very low standard).
 
when did he do that? and when are you going to provide us with this law that was violated?

Is it your claim that the President's family is not allowed to have a business? When did you come to this conclusion?
Oh that’s right. You guys think laws don’t apply to Trump. Never mind.
 
Back
Top Bottom