NYT bombshell: Trump sons cash in on $1.6 billion federal mining deal

[Zincwarrior]

Oh, my mistake. Of course Trump's kids are universally noted as experts in the mineral extraction business whose knowledge and history is well known the world over.

Right?

Oh wait.

Just as Hunter was an expert on Ukrainian natural gas.

 

[Mac-7]

Oh, my mistake. Of course Trump's kids are universally noted as experts in the mineral extraction business whose knowledge and history is well known the world over.

Right?

Oh wait.

They are investors who never claimed to be industrialists

 

[Concerned American]

So it's legal for the president's kids to take money for businesses and then get them government favors through their dad?

Just checking.

What government favors were given? Please be specific. Please be specific. BTW, why were you unconcerned when Hunter Biden was given a job in Ukraine in exchange for gov't favors. How about '10% for the big guy?'

 

[TimFitz]

What law did they break?

So, you're asserting that it is legal (and apparantly ethical) for a sitting US President to direct taxpayer funds to subsidize his son's business interests!

 

[TimFitz]

They are investors who never claimed to be industrialists

They're not investors. They are leeches.

You are paying them to manage a mining interest for which they have no background, contacts or experience with.

But they will do what their brother in law does. Take their "management fees" off the top and walk away with your money.

 

[Marener]

They are investors who never claimed to be industrialists

Oh, so it's all just a coincidence.

Gotcha.

 

[Marener]

What government favors were given? Please be specific. Please be specific. BTW, why were you unconcerned when Hunter Biden was given a job in Ukraine in exchange for gov't favors. How about '10% for the big guy?'

Read the article. Or do you need someone to read it to you?

 

[Concerned American]

Oh, my mistake. Of course Trump's kids are universally noted as experts in the mineral extraction business whose knowledge and history is well known the world over.

Right?

Oh wait.

Are you an expert in everything you are invested in, assuming you are invested in anything. I am invested in Microsoft but I wouldn't even be considered a novice in technology. Try again. REEEEEEEEEE

 

[Marener]

Are you an expert in everything you are invested in, assuming you are invested in anything. I am invested in Microsoft but I wouldn't even be considered a novice in technology. Try again. REEEEEEEEEE

During the call, Mr. Trump and his team won an agreement from the Kazakh leader to give a little-known American company access to one of the world’s largest untapped reserves of tungsten, a metal that the United States desperately needs for the production of missile warheads, fighter jets, computer chips and other critical goods.

 

[Concerned American]

Read the article. Or do you need someone to read it to you?

Obviously you didn't read the article. That is why you---like the article are short on specifics and sources. The article cites NO SOURCES. The NYT reported---. SMH. REEEEEE.

 

[struth]

So, you're asserting that it is legal (and apparantly ethical) for a sitting US President to direct taxpayer funds to subsidize his son's business interests!

How about you stop deflecting and answer the question

 

[struth]

Oh, my mistake. Of course Trump's kids are universally noted as experts in the mineral extraction business whose knowledge and history is well known the world over.

Right?

Oh wait.

Who claimed that? All they did was invest in a company, they didn’t claim to be experts on his to get minerals out or say they shoukd be on the b board of directors

Try again

 

[Concerned American]

During the call, Mr. Trump and his team won an agreement from the Kazakh leader to give a little-known American company access to one of the world’s largest untapped reserves of tungsten, a metal that the United States desperately needs for the production of missile warheads, fighter jets, computer chips and other critical goods.

You have not cited one violation of law. You also have not cited any source beyond 'the NYT reported.' BTW, they didn't support their article with sources either.

 

[struth]

You have not cited one violation of law. You also have not cited any source beyond 'the NYT reported.' BTW, they didn't support their article with sources either.

All they have is deflection and projection....this is the party that protected "pardon me" Hunter biden

 

[Marener]

You have not cited one violation of law. You also have not cited any source beyond 'the NYT reported.' BTW, they didn't support their article with sources either.

Again, you think it’s fine for Trump to use the government to enrich is family.

 

[struth]

Again, you think it’s fine for Trump to use the government to enrich is family.

when did he do that? and when are you going to provide us with this law that was violated?

Is it your claim that the President's family is not allowed to have a business? When did you come to this conclusion?

 

[TimFitz]

Obviously you didn't read the article. That is why you---like the article are short on specifics and sources. The article cites NO SOURCES. The NYT reported---. SMH. REEEEEE.

The New York Times is far more accurate and reliable than any media cited by Trump humpers (admittedly a very very low standard).

 

[Marener]

when did he do that? and when are you going to provide us with this law that was violated?

Is it your claim that the President's family is not allowed to have a business? When did you come to this conclusion?

Oh that’s right. You guys think laws don’t apply to Trump. Never mind.

 

[struth]

Oh that’s right. You guys think laws don’t apply to Trump. Never mind.

what law? stop deflecting, provide us with the code section......

 

[Marener]

what law? stop deflecting, provide us with the code section......

All of them. You think that all laws are meaningless for Trump.