NYC is considering removing statues of Washington and Columbus

Those suggestions were ignored when the rioters tore down some of them, and then bulled locals into removing them OR ELSE.
That isn't an argument for us not being able to get it done. In fact that's an argument showing our persistence and the weakness and willingness of the opposition to bend their knee.
And some monuments completely unrelated got torched because SJW's don't know history for shit.
Or just didn't realize who it was a statue of. No one's perfect.
54th Mass memorial, Matthias Baldwin, (who was an abolitionist), the elk statue in Portland.
His statue can be put back up. That isn't an argument that saves statues of your favorite slavers.
 
What about the shit political party?

You'll retroactively condemn the whites and culture of that time and yet (I assume) you are a member of and vote for the political party that was the main purveyor of slavery and discrimination from that same time period.
I am and I do. What does today's Democratic party share in common with the Confederate and segregationist dominated Democratic party other than the name? The party was simply the vehicle. When it belonged to Confederates and segregationists, white southern conservatives were doing the driving, today southern democrats are represented by those Black citizens they tried to hold down.
You're against the idea of venerating historical slave owners and yet you're a member of the political party those slave owners belonged to. In other words, you condemn one and not the other even though their sins are the same.
Well yes. A political party is a tool. A slaver is a person. Do you understand the difference? Why would I blame the tool for what Robert E Lee and Jefferson David did with it?
You're cherrypicking aspects of history and historical persons and entities for your own purposes.
I'm condemning all slavers. It's the people who want to venerate some slavers that are doing the cherry picking.
 
Christopher Columbus dramatically changed the trajectory of Western Civilization. This is an undeniable fact.

The indigenous people of the Americas were mainly still stuck in the hunter-gatherer level of human development, and would still be there if Western Man had not come to these shores. The fact that so many of them ardently strive to maintain their primitive, failed ways of life is one of life's true ironies.

Leftists constantly demonstrate that they have no understanding of history and lack even the most basic ability to evaluate important matters such as culture, technology, and the critical role of fossil fuels in human progress.
 
I am and I do. What does today's Democratic party share in common with the Confederate and segregationist dominated Democratic party other than the name? The party was simply the vehicle. When it belonged to Confederates and segregationists, white southern conservatives were doing the driving, today southern democrats are represented by those Black citizens they tried to hold down.

Well yes. A political party is a tool. A slaver is a person. Do you understand the difference? Why would I blame the tool for what Robert E Lee and Jefferson David did with it?

I'm condemning all slavers. It's the people who want to venerate some slavers that are doing the cherry picking.

You're still voting for klanners, who think you're basically a talking monkey. Because you're their bitch, and they know it.

1695220689993.webp
 
You're still voting for klanners, who think you're basically a talking monkey. Because you're their bitch, and they know it.

View attachment 831761
That's not an actual Klansman Marvin, that's a guy in a costume. An avid cosplayer like yourself should be able to tell the difference. Dressing up as a Klanman is uncouth for sure, but saying that Black people who vote for the Democratic Party are bitches and you're talking about 90% of black voters then you're not doing dress up, you're being real racist.
 
That's not an actual Klansman Marvin, that's a guy in a costume. An avid cosplayer like yourself should be able to tell the difference. Dressing up as a Klanman is uncouth for sure, but saying that Black people who vote for the Democratic Party are bitches and you're talking about 90% of black voters then you're not doing dress up, you're being real racist.
Do you need a "tussue"? LOL
 
What sort of decent person or society venerates rapists and slavers?

Real shit Marty. It's your claims that are bullshit until you provide evidence for them? Do you have any evidence of liberals saying history hurt them like I have of soft ass conservatives saying history hurt them?

Of course it does. This is just another claim of yours for which you have no evidence of. What the fuck does Karl Marx have to do with me?

Che hated homosexuals and minorities, yet the left seems to love his murderous ass.

Malcom X was virulently anti-white until he saw the light. remove his names from streets?

You don't provide evidence, you provide fellow traveler puff shit masquerading as evidence.

Stop pretending to not be one of those Anti-fa BLM wanna be vanguard party twats.
 
That isn't an argument for us not being able to get it done. In fact that's an argument showing our persistence and the weakness and willingness of the opposition to bend their knee.

Or just didn't realize who it was a statue of. No one's perfect.

His statue can be put back up. That isn't an argument that saves statues of your favorite slavers.

It shows you are a bunch of anarchist goons.

LOL, nice excuse dipshit.

It shows your ilk are morons and only have any balls when a mob is backing them up.
 
For now. I remember the same sort of suggestions being given for Confederate statues and look what happened to them. 😄
They will all fall because there is no good reason for a society of people who claim to be decent and moral people to venerate deplorable mutant slavers.
Most Confederate statues got relocated to civil war battlefields.
 
Che hated homosexuals and minorities, yet the left seems to love his murderous ass.
Some on the left. They're as deplorable in their veneration of Che as you are in your veneration of Slavers. What you're actually revealing is that you have that in common with them, not that they have that in common with me because I don't venerate Che.

It's a pretty stupid debate tactic to introduce something that reflects more poorly on you than it does me. 😄
Malcom X was virulently anti-white until he saw the light. remove his names from streets?
I understand the arguments for it. If a democratic majority of a city or state want to remove them I don't object because unlike you I'm not an emotional bitch over it.
You don't provide evidence, you provide fellow traveler puff shit masquerading as evidence.
I did. Soft ass conservatives saying how reading history from the perspective of a black person hurt them is evidence of soft ass conservatives saying history hurt them. How wouldn't it be? 😄
Stop pretending to not be one of those Anti-fa BLM wanna be vanguard party twats.
Who's pretending anything? 😄 I support BLM. That's definitively clear.
 
It shows you are a bunch of anarchist goons.

LOL, nice excuse dipshit.

It shows your ilk are morons and only have any balls when a mob is backing them up.
Pressuring politicians and them subsequently caving isn't anarchy, it's called effective politics you stupid Simp. 😄
 
Sorry, I thought I was using your native pidgin.
Because you're a moron and having one letter off the word broke your brain? 😄 I love how your best come back is tell me you were too stupid to figure it out.
 
I am and I do. What does today's Democratic party share in common with the Confederate and segregationist dominated Democratic party other than the name? The party was simply the vehicle. When it belonged to Confederates and segregationists, white southern conservatives were doing the driving, today southern democrats are represented by those Black citizens they tried to hold down.

Irrelevant. You said it was a "shit culture" - your words, not mine - yet you'll go back in history to condemn the culture for slavery but you won't go back in history to condemn the political party that was most responsible for making it "shitty".


Well yes. A political party is a tool. A slaver is a person. Do you understand the difference?

Do you? For the Democrats of the past, a political party is just a tool but Republicans of today are mostly "white evangelicals" who apparently deserve our contempt.

Put another way, the Democrats of the past are just a faceless public entity but Republicans of today are a collection of racist individuals.
Why would I blame the tool for what Robert E Lee and Jefferson David did with it?

Exactly. So why blame whites of today for things whites did in the past? I'm not saying you, in particular, are doing this but many blacks are.
I'm condemning all slavers. It's the people who want to venerate some slavers that are doing the cherry picking.
It's not cherrypicking if they want to venerate ALL historical figures that were instrumental in the founding and building of our nation. People like you are the ones cherrypicking by utterly condemning the ones you don't like because of one unsavory aspect of the culture of that time.
 
Lefties hate the US, yet urge illegals to move here.

So racist.
 
Back
Top Bottom