NY Congressman is opposed to Freedom of Speech.

[Moonglow]

Did I call it, or what?

Yeah but that’s a pretty easy call Oddball , given that Facebook IS a private corporation and NOT a government entity.

A private corporation given special dispensation from libel and anti-trust laws....That's not a "free market" by any stretch.

Sure it is, it’s regulated but it’s still free. Government isn’t inserting themselves into the transactions between Facebook and its customers (other than to take its cut), from what I understand they don’t have any special immunity to anti-trust laws though, I mean other than their ability to buy politicians that is.

Facebook has all the same rights to regulate speech on its platform (I.e. it’s PROPERTY) as you do to throw some schmuck off your property for planting campaign signs on your front lawn.

Surely he wouldn't suppress free speech by throwing someone off his property that is just establishing their freedom.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

I never ever see you ***** about my freedom of speech when I get a vacation from USMB....

Trump is no more special than I am....

They are so stupid they don't even understand the First Amendment. They are Commies because they think the federal government should tell Facebook what to do with their site.

wrong again
I am saying that facebook should censor Nadler if they are going to censor liars.

 

[Moonglow]

Did you get the word play or are you repressing my free speech like when Trump gets the pink?

I'm pointing out you ain't near as smart as you feel you are-

I don't feel smart at all I am just wise beyond compare.

 

[Gdjjr]

Surely he wouldn't suppress free speech by throwing someone off his property that is just establishing their freedom.

Stop being stupid in public- it's not flattering-

 

[Moonglow]

I never ever see you ***** about my freedom of speech when I get a vacation from USMB....

Trump is no more special than I am....

They are so stupid they don't even understand the First Amendment. They are Commies because they think the federal government should tell Facebook what to do with their site.

wrong again
I am saying that facebook should censor Nadler if they are going to censor liars.

Why don't you buy Facebook and do dat?

 

[Gdjjr]

I don't feel smart at all I am just wise beyond compare.

No, you're a perfect example of phony beyond belief-

 

[Moonglow]

Surely he wouldn't suppress free speech by throwing someone off his property that is just establishing their freedom.

Stop being stupid in public- it's not flattering-

Now you know how we feel having to hear about Trump the Maginifico being denied his free speech when he gets banned for breaking the rules he agreed to follow when he joined.

 

[NightFox]

Did I call it, or what?

Yeah but that’s a pretty easy call Oddball , given that Facebook IS a private corporation and NOT a government entity.

A private corporation given special dispensation from libel and anti-trust laws....That's not a "free market" by any stretch.

Sure it is, it’s regulated but it’s still free. Government isn’t inserting themselves into the transactions between Facebook and its customers (other than to take its cut), from what I understand they don’t have any special immunity to anti-trust laws though, I mean other than their ability to buy politicians that is.

Facebook has all the same rights to regulate speech on its platform (I.e. it’s PROPERTY) as you do to throw some schmuck off your property for planting campaign signs on your front lawn.

Surely he wouldn't suppress free speech by throwing someone off his property that is just establishing their freedom.

You don’t have the right to free speech on private property, unless of course you own it.

 

[Moonglow]

I don't feel smart at all I am just wise beyond compare.

No, you're a perfect example of phony beyond belief-

Exactly, I would never want you to know who I really am...Just like Trump isn't really who he claims to be when he wasn't banned from Facebook.

 

[Moonglow]

Did I call it, or what?

Yeah but that’s a pretty easy call Oddball , given that Facebook IS a private corporation and NOT a government entity.

A private corporation given special dispensation from libel and anti-trust laws....That's not a "free market" by any stretch.

Sure it is, it’s regulated but it’s still free. Government isn’t inserting themselves into the transactions between Facebook and its customers (other than to take its cut), from what I understand they don’t have any special immunity to anti-trust laws though, I mean other than their ability to buy politicians that is.

Facebook has all the same rights to regulate speech on its platform (I.e. it’s PROPERTY) as you do to throw some schmuck off your property for planting campaign signs on your front lawn.

Surely he wouldn't suppress free speech by throwing someone off his property that is just establishing their freedom.

You don’t have the right to free speech on private property, unless of course you own it.

My wife says I don't have any free speech no matter where I am at.

 

[Oddball]

Did I call it, or what?

Yeah but that’s a pretty easy call Oddball , given that Facebook IS a private corporation and NOT a government entity.

A private corporation given special dispensation from libel and anti-trust laws....That's not a "free market" by any stretch.

Sure it is, it’s regulated but it’s still free. Government isn’t inserting themselves into the transactions between Facebook and its customers (other than to take its cut), from what I understand they don’t have any special immunity to anti-trust laws though, I mean other than their ability to buy politicians that is.

Facebook has all the same rights to regulate speech on its platform (I.e. it’s PROPERTY) as you do to throw some schmuck off your property for planting campaign signs on your front lawn.

The internet is the new public square.....Fascistbook is picking and choosing whose speech is "acceptable" in that public square.

 

[daveman]

Did I call it, or what?

Yeah but that’s a pretty easy call Oddball , given that Facebook IS a private corporation and NOT a government entity.

A private corporation given special dispensation from libel and anti-trust laws....That's not a "free market" by any stretch.

Sure it is, it’s regulated but it’s still free. Government isn’t inserting themselves into the transactions between Facebook and its customers (other than to take its cut), from what I understand they don’t have any special immunity to anti-trust laws though, I mean other than their ability to buy politicians that is.

Facebook has all the same rights to regulate speech on its platform (I.e. it’s PROPERTY) as you do to throw some schmuck off your property for planting campaign signs on your front lawn.

By censoring ideas they do not agree with, they are a publisher, not a platform, and should not be granted the protections platforms enjoy.

 

[Oddball]

You don’t have the right to free speech on private property, unless of course you own it.

Does Fascistbook own the entire internet?

 

[NightFox]

Did I call it, or what?

Yeah but that’s a pretty easy call Oddball , given that Facebook IS a private corporation and NOT a government entity.

A private corporation given special dispensation from libel and anti-trust laws....That's not a "free market" by any stretch.

Sure it is, it’s regulated but it’s still free. Government isn’t inserting themselves into the transactions between Facebook and its customers (other than to take its cut), from what I understand they don’t have any special immunity to anti-trust laws though, I mean other than their ability to buy politicians that is.

Facebook has all the same rights to regulate speech on its platform (I.e. it’s PROPERTY) as you do to throw some schmuck off your property for planting campaign signs on your front lawn.

By censoring ideas they do not agree with, they are a publisher, not a platform, and should not be granted the protections platforms enjoy.

Publishers censor content they don’t agree with, always have,.

 

[Oddball]

 

[Damaged Eagle]

I never ever see you ***** about my freedom of speech when I get a vacation from USMB....

Trump is no more special than I am....

I miss you. I love it when you tuck your tail between your legs and take off whimpering and whining.

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[Oddball]

Did I call it, or what?

Yeah but that’s a pretty easy call Oddball , given that Facebook IS a private corporation and NOT a government entity.

A private corporation given special dispensation from libel and anti-trust laws....That's not a "free market" by any stretch.

Sure it is, it’s regulated but it’s still free. Government isn’t inserting themselves into the transactions between Facebook and its customers (other than to take its cut), from what I understand they don’t have any special immunity to anti-trust laws though, I mean other than their ability to buy politicians that is.

Facebook has all the same rights to regulate speech on its platform (I.e. it’s PROPERTY) as you do to throw some schmuck off your property for planting campaign signs on your front lawn.

By censoring ideas they do not agree with, they are a publisher, not a platform, and should not be granted the protections platforms enjoy.

Publishers censor content they don’t agree with, always have,.

Then Fascistbook is a publisher, not a platform.

As such, they waive their privileges and immunities under 230.

 

[HappyJoy]

In B4 "MUH PRIVATE CORPORATION!"

OP: 1 + 1 = 3
You: In B4 2
Someone with an education: 2
You: I so smart

 

[NightFox]

Did I call it, or what?

Yeah but that’s a pretty easy call Oddball , given that Facebook IS a private corporation and NOT a government entity.

A private corporation given special dispensation from libel and anti-trust laws....That's not a "free market" by any stretch.

Sure it is, it’s regulated but it’s still free. Government isn’t inserting themselves into the transactions between Facebook and its customers (other than to take its cut), from what I understand they don’t have any special immunity to anti-trust laws though, I mean other than their ability to buy politicians that is.

Facebook has all the same rights to regulate speech on its platform (I.e. it’s PROPERTY) as you do to throw some schmuck off your property for planting campaign signs on your front lawn.

By censoring ideas they do not agree with, they are a publisher, not a platform, and should not be granted the protections platforms enjoy.

Publishers censor content they don’t agree with, always have,.

Then Fascistbook is a publisher, not a platform.

As such, they waive their privileges and immunities under 230.

No, it doesn't work that way, what Facebook (and every other site on the Internet including THIS ONE) is immune to is lawsuits stemming from content posted by it's USERS. If Facebook, it's employees or designated representatives libel you on Facebook, then you can sue Facebook for it.

If we want to remove that protection then might as well shut down every site on the Internet that allows its users to post on it because who in there right mind is going to open themselves up to liability for what every Joe User happens to post, it's not feasible nor DESIRABLE.

 

[Oddball]

Did I call it, or what?

Yeah but that’s a pretty easy call Oddball , given that Facebook IS a private corporation and NOT a government entity.

A private corporation given special dispensation from libel and anti-trust laws....That's not a "free market" by any stretch.

Sure it is, it’s regulated but it’s still free. Government isn’t inserting themselves into the transactions between Facebook and its customers (other than to take its cut), from what I understand they don’t have any special immunity to anti-trust laws though, I mean other than their ability to buy politicians that is.

Facebook has all the same rights to regulate speech on its platform (I.e. it’s PROPERTY) as you do to throw some schmuck off your property for planting campaign signs on your front lawn.

By censoring ideas they do not agree with, they are a publisher, not a platform, and should not be granted the protections platforms enjoy.

Publishers censor content they don’t agree with, always have,.

Then Fascistbook is a publisher, not a platform.

As such, they waive their privileges and immunities under 230.

No, it doesn't work that way, what Facebook (and every other site on the Internet including THIS ONE) is immune to is lawsuits stemming from content posted by it's USERS. If Facebook, it's employees or designated representatives libel you on Facebook, then you can sue Facebook for it.

If we want to remove that protection then might as well shut down every site on the Internet that allows its users to post on it because who in there right mind is going to open themselves up to liability for what every Joe User happens to post, it's not feasible nor DESIRABLE.

As a platform not as a publisher, which is the road that Fascistbook and Twaffler have chosen to walk.