NWS Hiring Back DOGE Purges

candycorn

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
121,448
Reaction score
64,387
Points
2,605
Location
Occupied Arizona
1754563408105.webp


If only they had considered the value as well as the costs. Logarithms don't do that. So many lives lost....for nothing.

 
A lot of reorganized offices are going to hire back, I'm sure.
All Trump is trying to do is sift out the users, abusers, and criminal types from government offices.

As for the offices that were closed completely, I read a few months back, that all of the employees with clean records and good ratings on their work will be first in line to get rehired somewhere else in the gov't if they want.
 
If only they had considered the value as well as the costs. Logarithms don't do that. So many lives lost....for nothing
They're hiring some to cover for retirements and hurricane season.
125 I think they said earlier.

This was reported earlier this year.

You're trying to make this into something it is not.
 
View attachment 1145993

If only they had considered the value as well as the costs. Logarithms don't do that. So many lives lost....for nothing.


The government in general is hiring for positions again, that were lost to the DRP. The positions were not eliminated. People were volunteering to leave based on return to office mandate.
 
Was as long as the staff that controls the weather at the CIA is at full levels, what does it matter.
 
View attachment 1145993

If only they had considered the value as well as the costs. Logarithms don't do that. So many lives lost....for nothing.

No, I do not think that the shake up in the USA bureaucracy was at all for nothing. A little bit of fear of getting fired again could be a good thing among USA bureaucrats.

I do not believe that there was an easy way to do all that has happened in America over these past ten months of this new Trump administration.

I believe that the stage is being set up for the serious decrease in bureaucracy that was advocated by Economist Milton Friedman Ph. D?


x. The Distribution of IncomeFriedman examines the progressive income tax, introduced in order to redistribute income to make things more fair, and finds that, in fact, the rich take advantage of numerous loopholes, nullifying the redistributive effects. It would be far more fair just to have a uniform flat tax with no deductions, which could meet the 1962 tax revenues with a rate only slightly greater than the lowest tax bracket at that time.

xi. Social Welfare MeasuresThough well-intentioned, many social welfare measures don't help the poor as much as some think. Friedman focuses on Social Security as a particularly large and unfair system.

xii. Alleviation of PovertyFriedman regarded welfare programs as misguided and inefficient. To replace them, he advocates a negative income tax, giving everyone a guaranteed minimum income.
 
No, I do not think that the shake up in the USA bureaucracy was at all for nothing. A little bit of fear of getting fired again could be a good thing among USA bureaucrats.

I do not believe that there was an easy way to do all that has happened in America over these past ten months of this new Trump administration.

I believe that the stage is being set up for the serious decrease in bureaucracy that was advocated by Economist Milton Friedman Ph. D?
That stage is in the next budget appropriations bills.
 
Back
Top Bottom