Nunes Met Surveillance Source at the White House

[OKTexas]

You seem to be forgetting Comey laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence against the hildabitch. And then went down a laundry list of her lies under oath, in testimony before congress. So far all you got is supposition and speculation about Trump, Nunes or anyone else.

Clinton isn't on anyone's radar. That crap is over.

Really, I ask my congressmans office for an update on the congressional perjury referral every week. And I encourage everyone else to do so. That criminal ***** shouldn't be allowed to just walk away.

Well?
What was the answer?

Last I heard they were going to send a request for an update to the DOJ.

Is that what they tell you every week?

Nope, that was just a couple of weeks ago.

 

[vlad_hombre]

Corrupt to the very core ....

WASHINGTON — The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee met at the White House complex with the source of documents detailing the intelligence community's incidental collection of communications involving associates of President Trump, the chairman's top aide confirmed Monday.

The source of the intelligence reports cited by Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., has been a matter of increasing speculation, as the chairman declined to inform Democratic members of the existence of intelligence reports before briefing reporters and the president the day following his mysterious White House meeting.

Democrats, including the panel's ranking member, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., have asserted that Nunes sought to provide political cover to the president, who falsely claimed that the Obama administration wiretapped his New York offices in advance of the 2016 election.

Monday's disclosure, though, only raised more questions about Nunes' actions last week and his committee's ability to conduct an impartial investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election.

Intel chair Nunes met source of new surveillance documents at White House

Your post lost all credibility with incidental
The dems deliberately spied on Trump

If you don't want to get caught up in surveillance of corrupt Russian banks, you shouldn't be doing so much "business" with corrupt Russian banks.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

What?
Trump is the one under investigation.

Not by Nunes lol

Try to follow along if you can

Yes, no shit, that's the point, dope. Prosecutors and investigators don't typically share information with the subject of their investigations.

Nunes isn't investigating Trump. You're just not too bright

He's the chairman of the committee that's investigating Trump ties to Russia.

Are you really this out of the loop?

Yes and the evidence Nunes discovered was the unmasking of numerous members of the Trump transition team that had nothing to do with Russia, or the Russian investigation or foreign intelligence.

Nothing . Zip. Nada. In other words Obama's intel people were spying on Trump and sharing the information.

Spying.

Hmm...is that what Nunes has said?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Clinton isn't on anyone's radar. That crap is over.

Really, I ask my congressmans office for an update on the congressional perjury referral every week. And I encourage everyone else to do so. That criminal ***** shouldn't be allowed to just walk away.

Well?
What was the answer?

Last I heard they were going to send a request for an update to the DOJ.

Is that what they tell you every week?

Nope, that was just a couple of weeks ago.

Please update us when you get the word.

 

[theHawk]

Corrupt to the very core ....

WASHINGTON — The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee met at the White House complex with the source of documents detailing the intelligence community's incidental collection of communications involving associates of President Trump, the chairman's top aide confirmed Monday.

The source of the intelligence reports cited by Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., has been a matter of increasing speculation, as the chairman declined to inform Democratic members of the existence of intelligence reports before briefing reporters and the president the day following his mysterious White House meeting.

Democrats, including the panel's ranking member, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., have asserted that Nunes sought to provide political cover to the president, who falsely claimed that the Obama administration wiretapped his New York offices in advance of the 2016 election.

Monday's disclosure, though, only raised more questions about Nunes' actions last week and his committee's ability to conduct an impartial investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election.

Intel chair Nunes met source of new surveillance documents at White House

Well you Dems have been saying that the FBI were the ones tapping the Russians, so all the evidence gathered is legit and legal, right? So what are you afraid of?

 

[Care4all]

Corrupt you say? I don't remember ANYONE on the left having this position when Lynch met Bill on the plane and Bill's wife was being investigated by Lynch. Is Nunes investigating Trump or his wife criminally?

BIG DIFFERENCE..... the Year long FBI investigation, was over two weeks earlier.....IT was announced in the news two weeks earlier, and while I agree it looked just plain wrong, it could not have changed the results of the investigation....lynch was not doing the investigation, nor was she the prosecutor involved handling the investigation with the FBI.

NUNES was the head of this investigation of the presidents team, the watchdog checks and balance on the Whitehouse early in the investigation, notifying the people being investigated on something he never informed the senators on his team investigating.....


HIGHLY UNETHICAL and shows he is not being an investigator but a surrogate of those being investigated.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Corrupt to the very core ....

WASHINGTON — The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee met at the White House complex with the source of documents detailing the intelligence community's incidental collection of communications involving associates of President Trump, the chairman's top aide confirmed Monday.

The source of the intelligence reports cited by Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., has been a matter of increasing speculation, as the chairman declined to inform Democratic members of the existence of intelligence reports before briefing reporters and the president the day following his mysterious White House meeting.

Democrats, including the panel's ranking member, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., have asserted that Nunes sought to provide political cover to the president, who falsely claimed that the Obama administration wiretapped his New York offices in advance of the 2016 election.

Monday's disclosure, though, only raised more questions about Nunes' actions last week and his committee's ability to conduct an impartial investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election.

Intel chair Nunes met source of new surveillance documents at White House

Well you Dems have been saying that the FBI were the ones tapping the Russians, so all the evidence gathered is legit and legal, right? So what are you afraid of?

Let's not forget that there has been a counter intelligence investigation regarding Russian interference and the Trump campaign members since July.
It's not a stretch of logic to think that names are unmasked and added to inter agency reports as a part of that investigation.

This stuff didn't happen in a vacuum.

 

[OKTexas]

Really, I ask my congressmans office for an update on the congressional perjury referral every week. And I encourage everyone else to do so. That criminal ***** shouldn't be allowed to just walk away.

Well?
What was the answer?

Last I heard they were going to send a request for an update to the DOJ.

Is that what they tell you every week?

Nope, that was just a couple of weeks ago.

Please update us when you get the word.

I'll be happy to.

 

[OKTexas]

Corrupt to the very core ....

WASHINGTON — The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee met at the White House complex with the source of documents detailing the intelligence community's incidental collection of communications involving associates of President Trump, the chairman's top aide confirmed Monday.

The source of the intelligence reports cited by Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., has been a matter of increasing speculation, as the chairman declined to inform Democratic members of the existence of intelligence reports before briefing reporters and the president the day following his mysterious White House meeting.

Democrats, including the panel's ranking member, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., have asserted that Nunes sought to provide political cover to the president, who falsely claimed that the Obama administration wiretapped his New York offices in advance of the 2016 election.

Monday's disclosure, though, only raised more questions about Nunes' actions last week and his committee's ability to conduct an impartial investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election.

Intel chair Nunes met source of new surveillance documents at White House

Well you Dems have been saying that the FBI were the ones tapping the Russians, so all the evidence gathered is legit and legal, right? So what are you afraid of?

Let's not forget that there has been a counter intelligence investigation regarding Russian interference and the Trump campaign members since July.
It's not a stretch of logic to think that names are unmasked and added to inter agency reports as a part of that investigation.

This stuff didn't happen in a vacuum.

LMAO. The FBI is conducting the investigation, they would be the only possible agency with a need to know. And all this sharing of unmasked information occurred prior to the EO allowing unfettered dissemination.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Corrupt to the very core ....

WASHINGTON — The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee met at the White House complex with the source of documents detailing the intelligence community's incidental collection of communications involving associates of President Trump, the chairman's top aide confirmed Monday.

The source of the intelligence reports cited by Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., has been a matter of increasing speculation, as the chairman declined to inform Democratic members of the existence of intelligence reports before briefing reporters and the president the day following his mysterious White House meeting.

Democrats, including the panel's ranking member, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., have asserted that Nunes sought to provide political cover to the president, who falsely claimed that the Obama administration wiretapped his New York offices in advance of the 2016 election.

Monday's disclosure, though, only raised more questions about Nunes' actions last week and his committee's ability to conduct an impartial investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election.

Intel chair Nunes met source of new surveillance documents at White House

Well you Dems have been saying that the FBI were the ones tapping the Russians, so all the evidence gathered is legit and legal, right? So what are you afraid of?

Let's not forget that there has been a counter intelligence investigation regarding Russian interference and the Trump campaign members since July.
It's not a stretch of logic to think that names are unmasked and added to inter agency reports as a part of that investigation.

This stuff didn't happen in a vacuum.

LMAO. The FBI is conducting the investigation, they would be the only possible agency with a need to know. And all this sharing of unmasked information occurred prior to the EO allowing unfettered dissemination.

That's not true. Comey testified that the investigation into Russian interference was a counter intelligence investigation that relies on inter agency information. Director Rogers confirmed that. What EO are you referring to?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Trump’s Approval Falls Again to New Low

The latest Gallup daily tracking poll shows President Trump’s approval rate crashing to 36% to 57%.



“Trump’s current 36% is two percentage points below Barack Obama’s low point of 38%, recorded in 2011 and 2014. Trump has also edged below Bill Clinton’s all-time low of 37%, recorded in the summer of 1993, his first year in office, as well as Gerald Ford’s 37% low point in January and March 1975. John F. Kennedy’s lowest approval rating was 56%; Dwight Eisenhower’s was 48%.”

Trump has also hit a new low in the FiveThirtyEight tracking.

NUNES MET SURVEILLANCE SOURCE ON W.H. GROUNDS!


UPDATE: Schumer Calls On Paul Ryan To Remove Nunes As Intel Chair...

 

[OKTexas]

Corrupt to the very core ....

WASHINGTON — The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee met at the White House complex with the source of documents detailing the intelligence community's incidental collection of communications involving associates of President Trump, the chairman's top aide confirmed Monday.

The source of the intelligence reports cited by Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., has been a matter of increasing speculation, as the chairman declined to inform Democratic members of the existence of intelligence reports before briefing reporters and the president the day following his mysterious White House meeting.

Democrats, including the panel's ranking member, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., have asserted that Nunes sought to provide political cover to the president, who falsely claimed that the Obama administration wiretapped his New York offices in advance of the 2016 election.

Monday's disclosure, though, only raised more questions about Nunes' actions last week and his committee's ability to conduct an impartial investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election.

Intel chair Nunes met source of new surveillance documents at White House

Well you Dems have been saying that the FBI were the ones tapping the Russians, so all the evidence gathered is legit and legal, right? So what are you afraid of?

Let's not forget that there has been a counter intelligence investigation regarding Russian interference and the Trump campaign members since July.
It's not a stretch of logic to think that names are unmasked and added to inter agency reports as a part of that investigation.

This stuff didn't happen in a vacuum.

LMAO. The FBI is conducting the investigation, they would be the only possible agency with a need to know. And all this sharing of unmasked information occurred prior to the EO allowing unfettered dissemination.

That's not true. Comey testified that the investigation into Russian interference was a counter intelligence investigation that relies on inter agency information. Director Rogers confirmed that. What EO are you referring to?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/...tude-to-share-intercepted-communications.html

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Nothing showed Slick tried to influence Lynch. He didn't have to actually because she was in Hillary's camp all along. It was stupid for Slick to do that, in I think it was the ultimate reason she lost 200K votes in Pa Mich and Wisc

The question remains why team Trump has Russian ties. I'm not really sure what Nunez is up to ... beyond covering Trump's strangely large ass. He shouldn't be doing that if he's the chairman of the committee, but obviously the gop doesn't want to lose their president. And there may be something nefarious in leaking the names of the Trump people. But there shouldn't be any covering up of Trump's ties to Putin ... whatever they may be.

The question remains why team Trump has Russian ties....actually Putin has Trump ties

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Corrupt you say? I don't remember ANYONE on the left having this position when Lynch met Bill on the plane and Bill's wife was being investigated by Lynch. Is Nunes investigating Trump or his wife criminally?

BIG DIFFERENCE..... the Year long FBI investigation, was over two weeks earlier.....IT was announced in the news two weeks earlier, and while I agree it looked just plain wrong, it could not have changed the results of the investigation....lynch was not doing the investigation, nor was she the prosecutor involved handling the investigation with the FBI.

NUNES was the head of this investigation of the presidents team, the watchdog checks and balance on the Whitehouse early in the investigation, notifying the people being investigated on something he never informed the senators on his team investigating.....


HIGHLY UNETHICAL and shows he is not being an investigator but a surrogate of those being investigated.

No difference. Corruption is corruption and that is easily provable. So what's the proof?

 

[bendog]

Go back to sleep Gramps.

I wonder who Nunes' s source in the WH is?

 

[bendog]

Nothing showed Slick tried to influence Lynch. He didn't have to actually because she was in Hillary's camp all along. It was stupid for Slick to do that, in I think it was the ultimate reason she lost 200K votes in Pa Mich and Wisc

The question remains why team Trump has Russian ties. I'm not really sure what Nunez is up to ... beyond covering Trump's strangely large ass. He shouldn't be doing that if he's the chairman of the committee, but obviously the gop doesn't want to lose their president. And there may be something nefarious in leaking the names of the Trump people. But there shouldn't be any covering up of Trump's ties to Putin ... whatever they may be.

The question remains why team Trump has Russian ties....actually Putin has Trump ties

Well, Manaforts made millions and Flynn less. IF Roger Stone really had a internet connection to Gucifiers ..... that's not good.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Corrupt to the very core ....

WASHINGTON — The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee met at the White House complex with the source of documents detailing the intelligence community's incidental collection of communications involving associates of President Trump, the chairman's top aide confirmed Monday.

The source of the intelligence reports cited by Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., has been a matter of increasing speculation, as the chairman declined to inform Democratic members of the existence of intelligence reports before briefing reporters and the president the day following his mysterious White House meeting.

Democrats, including the panel's ranking member, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., have asserted that Nunes sought to provide political cover to the president, who falsely claimed that the Obama administration wiretapped his New York offices in advance of the 2016 election.

Monday's disclosure, though, only raised more questions about Nunes' actions last week and his committee's ability to conduct an impartial investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election.

Intel chair Nunes met source of new surveillance documents at White House

Well you Dems have been saying that the FBI were the ones tapping the Russians, so all the evidence gathered is legit and legal, right? So what are you afraid of?

Let's not forget that there has been a counter intelligence investigation regarding Russian interference and the Trump campaign members since July.
It's not a stretch of logic to think that names are unmasked and added to inter agency reports as a part of that investigation.

This stuff didn't happen in a vacuum.

LMAO. The FBI is conducting the investigation, they would be the only possible agency with a need to know. And all this sharing of unmasked information occurred prior to the EO allowing unfettered dissemination.

That's not true. Comey testified that the investigation into Russian interference was a counter intelligence investigation that relies on inter agency information. Director Rogers confirmed that. What EO are you referring to?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/...tude-to-share-intercepted-communications.html

Is that what Nunes is referring to? You have no idea of what communications from what agency he's even talking about. The only thing you know is that it was incidental.

 

[OKTexas]

Well you Dems have been saying that the FBI were the ones tapping the Russians, so all the evidence gathered is legit and legal, right? So what are you afraid of?

Let's not forget that there has been a counter intelligence investigation regarding Russian interference and the Trump campaign members since July.
It's not a stretch of logic to think that names are unmasked and added to inter agency reports as a part of that investigation.

This stuff didn't happen in a vacuum.

LMAO. The FBI is conducting the investigation, they would be the only possible agency with a need to know. And all this sharing of unmasked information occurred prior to the EO allowing unfettered dissemination.

That's not true. Comey testified that the investigation into Russian interference was a counter intelligence investigation that relies on inter agency information. Director Rogers confirmed that. What EO are you referring to?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/...tude-to-share-intercepted-communications.html

Is that what Nunes is referring to? You have no idea of what communications from what agency he's even talking about. The only thing you know is that it was incidental.

And they had nothing to do with the Russia investigation, you regressives always forget that point for some reason.

 

[bendog]

Well you Dems have been saying that the FBI were the ones tapping the Russians, so all the evidence gathered is legit and legal, right? So what are you afraid of?

Let's not forget that there has been a counter intelligence investigation regarding Russian interference and the Trump campaign members since July.
It's not a stretch of logic to think that names are unmasked and added to inter agency reports as a part of that investigation.

This stuff didn't happen in a vacuum.

LMAO. The FBI is conducting the investigation, they would be the only possible agency with a need to know. And all this sharing of unmasked information occurred prior to the EO allowing unfettered dissemination.

That's not true. Comey testified that the investigation into Russian interference was a counter intelligence investigation that relies on inter agency information. Director Rogers confirmed that. What EO are you referring to?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/...tude-to-share-intercepted-communications.html

Is that what Nunes is referring to? You have no idea of what communications from what agency he's even talking about. The only thing you know is that it was incidental.

I think the NSA already said it intercepted incidental communications.

 

[bendog]

Let's not forget that there has been a counter intelligence investigation regarding Russian interference and the Trump campaign members since July.
It's not a stretch of logic to think that names are unmasked and added to inter agency reports as a part of that investigation.

This stuff didn't happen in a vacuum.

LMAO. The FBI is conducting the investigation, they would be the only possible agency with a need to know. And all this sharing of unmasked information occurred prior to the EO allowing unfettered dissemination.

That's not true. Comey testified that the investigation into Russian interference was a counter intelligence investigation that relies on inter agency information. Director Rogers confirmed that. What EO are you referring to?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/...tude-to-share-intercepted-communications.html

Is that what Nunes is referring to? You have no idea of what communications from what agency he's even talking about. The only thing you know is that it was incidental.

And they had nothing to do with the Russia investigation, you regressives always forget that point for some reason.

That's not necessarily true. It's reported that Stone had an internet contact with Guccifier which was the source of Russia's interference with the Clinton campaign.