- Jan 27, 2017
- 20,840
- 25,235
- 2,415
Math is hard for chics
It sure as hell is for this chic, anyway.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Math is hard for chics
You must’ve heard right wingers say how Donald Trump‘s interview with Tucker Carlson in Twitter got a gazillion million views and therefore a gazillion million viewers and therefore a gazillion million voters.
It turns out that any time anyone scrolled past the tweet containing the interview, it was registered as a “view”.
“X’s “views” metric, implemented by new owner Elon Musk, doesn’t actually measure how many people watched a video like Carlson’s. Rather, it registers every instance of his tweet appearing on any user’s screen, even if they never click on the video. So if you log into X, its algorithm puts Carlson’s tweet in your feed, and you scroll past it without watching, that counts as a view. The metric also counts multiple views of the tweet from the same user, including by its author.”
You should know.Math is hard for chics
He’s talking to the mirror right nowYou're terrified. LMAO. Who are you trying to convince? You or me?
LMAO and YOU would be the pivot man, eh, Winnie?Sure, it could be, just PROVES the Cult of Trump.
No One cares except you RWI's.
Meanwhile is the trump cult circle jerk.
View attachment 819204
Then why did you guys start the OP? Irony huh?Sure, it could be, just PROVES the Cult of Trump.
Somehow you missed being in this:Sure, it could be, just PROVES the Cult of Trump.
No One cares except you RWI's.
Meanwhile is the trump cult circle jerk.
View attachment 819204
You must’ve heard right wingers say how Donald Trump‘s interview with Tucker Carlson in Twitter got a gazillion million views and therefore a gazillion million viewers and therefore a gazillion million voters.
It turns out that any time anyone scrolled past the tweet containing the interview, it was registered as a “view”.
“X’s “views” metric, implemented by new owner Elon Musk, doesn’t actually measure how many people watched a video like Carlson’s. Rather, it registers every instance of his tweet appearing on any user’s screen, even if they never click on the video. So if you log into X, its algorithm puts Carlson’s tweet in your feed, and you scroll past it without watching, that counts as a view. The metric also counts multiple views of the tweet from the same user, including by its author.”
Ur wrongHow could it be more? Did you not read that people who scrolled past it count as views?
I think you read it, but you’re playing dumb about it
Is that the same washington compost that got Pulitzers for their reporting on the Russia Collusion Delusion that wasn't?
.
Really bothers you huh?How could it be more? Did you not read that people who scrolled past it count as views?
I think you read it, but you’re playing dumb about it
It is.
That guy didn't die yet?Ur wrong
He’s getting way more views than MrBeast
You must’ve heard right wingers say how Donald Trump‘s interview with Tucker Carlson in Twitter got a gazillion million views and therefore a gazillion million viewers and therefore a gazillion million voters.
It turns out that any time anyone scrolled past the tweet containing the interview, it was registered as a “view”.
“X’s “views” metric, implemented by new owner Elon Musk, doesn’t actually measure how many people watched a video like Carlson’s. Rather, it registers every instance of his tweet appearing on any user’s screen, even if they never click on the video. So if you log into X, its algorithm puts Carlson’s tweet in your feed, and you scroll past it without watching, that counts as a view. The metric also counts multiple views of the tweet from the same user, including by its author.”
Pathetic gaslighting spin attempt, loser!
Damage control? Trump won that debate and the rating war. More popular than ever.
How could it be more? Did you not read that people who scrolled past it count as views?
I think you read it, but you’re playing dumb about it
You cant comprehend what you read, can you? It's why you believe in conspiracies.so it could be more,,
You can't even spell can't. Idiot.You cant comprehend what you read, can you? It's why you believe in conspiracies.