TownHall is a loony site.
facts:
The case, N.R.A. v. Vullo,
No. 22-842, began in 2017, when the New York Department of Financial Services started an investigation into an insurance product known as “Carry Guard,” which provided coverage for various issues arising from the use of firearms, such as personal injuries and criminal defense.
...
The case, N.R.A. v. Vullo,
No. 22-842, began in 2017, when the New York Department of Financial Services started an investigation into an insurance product known as “Carry Guard,” which provided coverage for various issues arising from the use of firearms, such as personal injuries and criminal defense.
The department regulates more than 1,400 companies and more than 1,900 financial institutions, and it concluded that Carry Guard violated state insurance law, in part, by providing liability coverage for injury from the wrongful use of a firearm. The department entered into agreements with the insurance groups and imposed civil penalties.
After the Parkland shooting in 2018, the department began to re-evaluate “the implications of regulated entities’ relationships with gun-promotion organizations,” according to
legal filings for Ms. Vullo.