B. Kidd
Diamond Member
WHEN were these polls done ?
Cause most polls were in margin of error by the election . Shit really shifted after the comey letter.
And Putin put Comey up to it..........idjit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
WHEN were these polls done ?
Cause most polls were in margin of error by the election . Shit really shifted after the comey letter.
Silver used the last THREE WEEKS of polls to compile the averages. That makes his so-called study useless.
Polls are snapshots, not fortune tellers. At most, the last week of polling is the appropriate yardstick.
The last three weeks should tell you what will happen in the election nitwit. The polling was dead wrong uniformly bias against Trump. That cannot be argued.
Silver used the last THREE WEEKS of polls to compile the averages. That makes his so-called study useless.
Polls are snapshots, not fortune tellers. At most, the last week of polling is the appropriate yardstick.
The last three weeks should tell you what will happen in the election nitwit. The polling was dead wrong uniformly bias against Trump. That cannot be argued.
You don't know much about polls do you?
The poll average 3 weeks out had Clinton winning by 7. The final poll average, all within a week of the election, had her winning by 3.2. She won by 2 pts.
Obviously much changed in 3 weeks and therefore any poll 3 weeks out was not only obsolete,
but it was going to skew Silver's numbers to make it look like the polls were far more off than they really were.
Clearly you don't because you were expecting a shrilary win.
. The thing your trying to avoid is the liberal biased interpretation of the polls who wanted so bad for their gal to win. They then used their bully pulpit (biased media outlets) to try and pull it all off. They got their aces kicked, and that's why their such sore losers. They are still trying to shore up the agenda in order to insulate it against the onslaught that's coming.Silver used the last THREE WEEKS of polls to compile the averages. That makes his so-called study useless.
Polls are snapshots, not fortune tellers. At most, the last week of polling is the appropriate yardstick.
The last three weeks should tell you what will happen in the election nitwit. The polling was dead wrong uniformly bias against Trump. That cannot be argued.
You don't know much about polls do you?
The poll average 3 weeks out had Clinton winning by 7. The final poll average, all within a week of the election, had her winning by 3.2. She won by 2 pts.
Obviously much changed in 3 weeks and therefore any poll 3 weeks out was not only obsolete,
but it was going to skew Silver's numbers to make it look like the polls were far more off than they really were.
. I'm talking about the polls that were being interpreted by liberals as a Hillary win, and this they were doing even though the polls didn't reflect accurately that win, but they refused to accept anything but a win no matter what. It really made them look stupid, evil, cunning, and manipulative in the end, and next came the crying.. The thing your trying to avoid is the liberal biased interpretation of the polls who wanted so bad for their gal to win. They then used their bully pulpit (biased media outlets) to try and pull it all off. They got their aces kicked, and that's why their such sore losers. They are still trying to shore up the agenda in order to insulate it against the onslaught that's coming.Silver used the last THREE WEEKS of polls to compile the averages. That makes his so-called study useless.
Polls are snapshots, not fortune tellers. At most, the last week of polling is the appropriate yardstick.
The last three weeks should tell you what will happen in the election nitwit. The polling was dead wrong uniformly bias against Trump. That cannot be argued.
You don't know much about polls do you?
The poll average 3 weeks out had Clinton winning by 7. The final poll average, all within a week of the election, had her winning by 3.2. She won by 2 pts.
Obviously much changed in 3 weeks and therefore any poll 3 weeks out was not only obsolete,
but it was going to skew Silver's numbers to make it look like the polls were far more off than they really were.
So i point out that the poll that showed Hillary Clinton the farthest ahead in the Wisconsin polls
was a REPUBLICAN poll, and you people go on about how the polls showed Hillary ahead out of liberal bias.
Are you mentally retarded? Seriously, I'm genuinely curious.
Once again the polls were right the undecided broke for Trump. The Press ignored the fact that 10 to 15 percent of the public had not stated who they would vote for.The reason the Polls were so wrong is because about 10 percent to 15 percent of each poll was undecided. And they broke for Trump. Hillary Clinton got her numbers they just were not enough when the polls ignored 10 to 15 percent of voters.
. Explain the electoral vote then.. How could they have gotten that so wrong ?? I know how. Wishful thinking is how.Once again the polls were right the undecided broke for Trump. The Press ignored the fact that 10 to 15 percent of the public had not stated who they would vote for.The reason the Polls were so wrong is because about 10 percent to 15 percent of each poll was undecided. And they broke for Trump. Hillary Clinton got her numbers they just were not enough when the polls ignored 10 to 15 percent of voters.