Now we see what the judges do. Trump wins in court.

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Smith did request it laffy.

And Chutkan did grant it.

And that does not mean the U.S. can make use of it again by attempting to re-file.

Your ignorance is truly boundless, laffy.

If it had been dismissed WITH prejudice, then no the case cannot be refiled and that would have been the end of everything concerning those particular charges.

But since the case was dismissed WITHOUT prejudice, that leaves open the door for the prosecutor (or plaintiff in civil cases) to refile the same charges again as long as they are refiled within the statute of limitations.

Apparently this scenario has never presented itself before so there is no precedence for tolling the statute of limitations (pausing them) while Trump is in office which is what is keeping him from being fully prosecuted.

 

[Winco]

Not a chance.

Your ignorance knows no bounds.

1). It's NOT gonna happen because you think no one will bring back the charges?
2). It Legally CAN happen, but you don't think it will?
3). You just like calling people Stupid, Dumb, Morons, and Ignorant, because you think you are superior??????



"Dismissed without prejudice" is a legal term that means a case has been dismissed, but the plaintiff or prosecutor can refile it later without damaging their right to have it heard in court.

 

[BluesLegend]

More proof this was just lawfare conjured up by jive ass suckers in the Dem party.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

If it had been dismissed WITH prejudice, then no the case cannot be refiled and that would have been the end of everything concerning those particular charges.

But since the case was dismissed WITHOUT prejudice, that leaves open the door for the prosecutor (or plaintiff in civil cases) to refile the same charges again as long as they are refiled within the statute of limitations.

Apparently this scenario has never presented itself before so there is no precedence for tolling the statute of limitations (pausing them) while Trump is in office which is what is keeping him from being fully prosecuted.

This case against Trump was already heard. It wasn't dismissed, Jack Smith LOST. Smith then appealed. That's what was pending. The hearing on the appeal. Smith withdrew the appeal, leaving the original verdict standing.

 

[Man With A Plan]

Smith will ask for dismissal without prejudice, so the charges can be brought back on Jan 22, 2029.

Too bad the statute of limitations for those charges runs out BEFORE 2029!

 

[BluesLegend]

Too bad the statute of limitations for those charges runs out BEFORE 2029!

You mean the limitations Dems just re-wrote so they could charge Trump?

 

[Clipper]

More proof this was just lawfare conjured up by jive ass suckers in the Dem party.

Idiot, Smith dropped the charges because:

The case will not go to trial before The Subhuman is sworn in.

A sitting POTUS cannot be charged with a crime.

Trump will order the case be dropped by Pam Bondage, his next AG flunkie.

The criminal Don may pardon himself anyway.

Now you can put your dunce hat on & go sit in a corner forever.

 

[BluesLegend]

Idiot, Smith dropped the charges because:

The case will not go to trial before The Subhuman is sworn in.

A sitting POTUS cannot be charged with a crime.

Trump will order the case be dropped by Pam Bondage, his next AG flunkie.

The criminal Don may pardon himself anyway.

Now you can put your dunce hat on & go sit in a corner forever.

Cry harder loser Dems, you got your ass whooped again by Trump your daddy.

 

[Man With A Plan]

You mean the limitations Dems just re-wrote so they could charge Trump?

You do have a point there, Blues! The rule of law doesn't mean much to Democrats...does it? But then again...showing the American people that...was probably one of the things that cost them the election!

 

[The Duke]

False.

Nor will you. Ever.

It's a lot easier.to say you did, than to actually.do it. As Trump's lawyers were finding out.

In b4 the public treason hangings.

 

[The Duke]

If it had been dismissed WITH prejudice, then no the case cannot be refiled and that would have been the end of everything concerning those particular charges.

But since the case was dismissed WITHOUT prejudice, that leaves open the door for the prosecutor (or plaintiff in civil cases) to refile the same charges again as long as they are refiled within the statute of limitations.

Apparently this scenario has never presented itself before so there is no precedence for tolling the statute of limitations (pausing them) while Trump is in office which is what is keeping him from being fully prosecuted.

This case will not be revisited. Well, until the trials of those that brought it.

 

[Man With A Plan]

Idiot, Smith dropped the charges because:

The case will not go to trial before The Subhuman is sworn in.

A sitting POTUS cannot be charged with a crime.

Trump will order the case be dropped by Pam Bondage, his next AG flunkie.

The criminal Don may pardon himself anyway.

Now you can put your dunce hat on & go sit in a corner forever.

Smith dropped the charges because he didn't want to be there when Trump took office since firing Jack Smith would have been Trump's very first act as President. I'm pretty sure Trump would have made that phone call himself!

 

[Clipper]

Smith dropped the charges because he didn't want to be there when Trump took office since firing Jack Smith would have been Trump's very first act as President. I'm pretty sure Trump would have made that phone call himself!

Smith is going to resign before the criminal subhuman Trump is sworn in, denying the ape the chance to jizz himself like he did on J6.

 

[The Duke]

Smith is going to resign before the criminal subhuman Trump is sworn in, denying the ape the chance to jizz himself like he did on J6.

So ShitLord, did Mueller or Smith get The bad Orange man?

 

[BackAgain]

False.

Nor will you. Ever.

It's a lot easier.to say you did, than to actually.do it. As Trump's lawyers were finding out.

Nah. I have. Your lies don’t control anything, Farty.

 

[BackAgain]

Of course the US can reuse it again. I have guided through this whole discussion, with you then saying, "But..." with nothing of worth to support yourself.

Sure laffy. Sure.

You haven’t guided anything.

And the fact remains, the case will never be resuscitated as you initially claimed it could be.

What you don’t understand about a motion to refile dismissed charges could fill a law library.

 

[BackAgain]

Oh wow, I had no idea that the judge had already granted the government motion for dismissal without prejudice.

Does this also mean that the statute of limitations are tolled during Trump's presidency?

I don’t believe so. They had already filed their charges. And there are a variety of arguments to support the possible claim of the government that this post indictment delay in bringing the case to trial was either with the consent of the defendant or pursuant to judicial order.

But it sure seems like (or maybe you’re right and it is, effectively) a tolled period.

 

[BackAgain]

If it had been dismissed WITH prejudice, then no the case cannot be refiled and that would have been the end of everything concerning those particular charges.

But since the case was dismissed WITHOUT prejudice, that leaves open the door for the prosecutor (or plaintiff in civil cases) to refile the same charges again as long as they are refiled within the statute of limitations.

Apparently this scenario has never presented itself before so there is no precedence for tolling the statute of limitations (pausing them) while Trump is in office which is what is keeping him from being fully prosecuted.

It may not be the only thing keeping him from being tried. It may instead very well be that the SCOTUS decision is also forever going to keep it barred from being tried.

But to have this shit hanging over the President’s head until 2029 is disgraceful.

 

[BackAgain]

1). It's NOT gonna happen because you think no one will bring back the charges?

I think it would be idiotic and pointless effort. But that’s not why it won’t happen.

2). It Legally CAN happen, but you don't think it will?

I believe they can legally be refiled, in theory. But beyond that silly prospect, it will never happen in reality. Why not? Because the whole shebang was always partisan political lawfare and it failed. No purpose would be served anymore.

3). You just like calling people Stupid, Dumb, Morons, and Ignorant, because you think you are superior??????

No. I know I’m smarter than idiots like you.
Of course, that’s not a big step. Kinda like stepping over a painted white line on the road.

"Dismissed without prejudice" is a legal term that means a case has been dismissed, but the plaintiff or prosecutor can refile it later without damaging their right to have it heard in court.

Yes. That is what the term means. Happy you looked it up. Saves me the trouble of having to educate your ignorant ass.

 

[Clipper]

So ShitLord, did Mueller or Smith get The bad Orange man?

Like I daid, dunce, Smith dropped the charges without prejudice & the judge agreed. The charges were dropped not because DOJ believes the subhuman is innocent, not by a longshot. The charges were dropped because of DOJ's policy not to proecute a criminal like him because he'll be sworn in as a fake potus soon, despite the ape ranting & raving about it.

Is that clear enough for you to understand? If not, keep bleeeeevin in the orange blob' s bullshit