Now we see what the judges do. Trump wins in court.

[BackAgain]

Judge grants Jack Smith request to dismiss Jan. 6 charges against Trump, appeal dropped in Florida docs case — Fox News

The federal case against President-elect Donald Trump, which stemmed from Smith's investigation into the Jan. 6 U.S. Capitol breach, was dismissed on Monday.

apple.news

God Bless America!

Justice. At last.

 

[Cassandro]

All those involved in prosecuting the Jan. 6 protesters should be charged with kidnapping and criminal conspiracy.

 

[Independent thinker]

All those involved in prosecuting the Jan. 6 protesters should be charged with kidnapping and criminal conspiracy.

Yeah, they are all closing up shop and getting ready to flee the country. Those left should be prosecuted.

 

[lafayette]

Smith will ask for dismissal without prejudice, so the charges can be brought back on Jan 22, 2029.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What a global embarrassment.

 

[BackAgain]

Smith will ask for dismissal without prejudice, so the charges can be brought back on Jan 22, 2029.

Not a chance.

Your ignorance knows no bounds.

 

[lafayette]

Check the motion, bright eyes.

 

[BackAgain]

Check the motion, bright eyes.

Check reality, dullard.

 

[BackAgain]

Let me explain for the benefit of anybody misled by laffy.

Asking the court to dismiss “without prejudice” does not mean that the court will grant that part of the motion.

And, interestingly, if not granted with prejudice, that doesn’t mean that the refiling of the amended indictment will be granted.

There is no chance that the United States will ever refile these absurd charges against President Trump.

And while it might be true that the “defense” has no objection to a dismissal (why would they), that doesn’t mean that the defense also agrees to a dismissal without prejudice.

Although that was smith’s claim and Judge Chilean granted dismissal without prejudice (see https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148.282.0.pdf ), I’d like to see the papers in which team Trump agreed to the dismissal without prejudice.

Again, there is no chance the gubmint will ever refile those charges.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There is no chance that the United States will ever refile these absurd charges against President Trump.

Of course, you couldn't argue why they are absurd, if your life depended on it.

Neither could Trump's lawyers.

 

[BackAgain]

Of course, you couldn't argue why they are absurd, if your life depended on it.

Of course, I already have.

Neither could Trump's lawyers.

They did.

Your ability to comprehend anything and everything remains at zero.

 

[toobfreak]

Judge grants Jack Smith's request to dismiss Jan. 6 charges​

This is significant. Not only is it another huge victory and vindication for Trump, but because:

1. Courts do not simply drop cases because their defendant is (temporarily) out of reach.
2. Considering how many times democrats have argued and challenged rulings by the SC, yet they are not challenging it here.
3. ALL THAT LEAVES is the obvious: these cases were intended to stop Trump from running/getting reelected--- having FAILED that now, they are POINTLESS. Smith has essentially ADMITTED that the case(s) were all politically motivated, not legally, ie.: a weaponization of the courts against democrat political opponents.

These actions must be responded to now with the most SEVERE consequences for all those involved.
Jack Smith has in effect admitted that he and other democrats were engaged in a political coup of the government using the courts as their sledgehammer-- that is TREASON.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Of course, I already have.

Not once.

Nor will you.

Because no, you didn't outsmart Trump's lawyers. I promise.

 

[BackAgain]

Not once.

Nor will you.

Because no, you didn't outsmart Trump's lawyers. I promise.

I have repeatedly burning denial doesn’t change that fact

And Trump’s lawyers were also correct. In promise you. But unlike yours, my promise has merit.

 

[lafayette]

Let me explain for the benefit of anybody misled by laffy.

Asking the court to dismiss “without prejudice” does not mean that the court will grant that part of the motion.

And, interestingly, if not granted with prejudice, that doesn’t mean that the refiling of the amended indictment will be granted.

There is no chance that the United States will ever refile these absurd charges against President Trump.

And while it might be true that the “defense” has no objection to a dismissal (why would they), that doesn’t mean that the defense also agrees to a dismissal without prejudice.

Although that was smith’s claim and Judge Chilean granted dismissal without prejudice (see https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148.282.0.pdf ), I’d like to see the papers in which team Trump agreed to the dismissal without prejudice.

Again, there is no chance the gubmint will ever refile those charges.

Smith can request dismissal without prejudice. This Judge grant it, despite what yetlostagain says.

 

[BackAgain]

Smith can request dismissal without prejudice. This Judge grant it, despite what yetlostagain says.

Smith did request it laffy.

And Chutkan did grant it.

And that does not mean the U.S. can make use of it again by attempting to re-file.

Your ignorance is truly boundless, laffy.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I have repeatedly burning denial doesn’t change that fact

False.

Nor will you. Ever.

It's a lot easier.to say you did, than to actually.do it. As Trump's lawyers were finding out.

 

[lafayette]

Smith did request it laffy.

And Chutkan did grant it.

And that does not mean the U.S. can make use of it again by attempting to re-file.

Your ignorance is truly boundless, laffy.

Of course the US can reuse it again. I have guided through this whole discussion, with you then saying, "But..." with nothing of worth to support yourself.

 

[elektra]

Smith can request dismissal without prejudice. This Judge grant it, despite what yetlostagain says.

Not a chance.
Your ignorance knows no bounds.

It ain't ignorance it is religious faith and hope, worshipping at the alter of the democrat party

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Let me explain for the benefit of anybody misled by laffy.

Asking the court to dismiss “without prejudice” does not mean that the court will grant that part of the motion.

And, interestingly, if not granted with prejudice, that doesn’t mean that the refiling of the amended indictment will be granted.

There is no chance that the United States will ever refile these absurd charges against President Trump.

And while it might be true that the “defense” has no objection to a dismissal (why would they), that doesn’t mean that the defense also agrees to a dismissal without prejudice.

Although that was smith’s claim and Judge Chilean granted dismissal without prejudice (see https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148.282.0.pdf ), I’d like to see the papers in which team Trump agreed to the dismissal without prejudice.

Again, there is no chance the gubmint will ever refile those charges.

Oh wow, I had no idea that the judge had already granted the government motion for dismissal without prejudice.

Does this also mean that the statute of limitations are tolled during Trump's presidency?