Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 125,906
- 90,842
- 3,635
WTF?? It wasn't because of one man?? Who else's name did those insurgents parade other than Trump's?And I say if these idiots (I agree with you) did this it was not because of one man. Show me where I claim full stop there was election fraud. I said the optics are bad. That was it. And the optics are bad.you're not known to stick to the facts.And my point is that is a 100% guess on your part. Stop making your guesses seem like definitive statements.So you didn't say this?You're moving goal posts. The OP stated the article inferred it. You may take it up with him. Maybe you should stop making definitive statements on your educated guesses. You're such a sad excuse for a human being. Snowflake.Neither you nor I are the experts on "responsible media". Maxine Watters incited violence when Trump won in 2016 and CNN stated on air that no one said protests have to be peaceful. You really need to get in the real world. The News Entertainment Media is dividing this country. If you cannot see that you're blind.Not what your post said. Your post stated this:It may not have happened. You don't know this. Are we going to guess together until you are triggered again and begin swearing?Quote the part where WaPo absolves Trump.
They are not in a position to absolve anything. They are in a position to report actual facts.
And? Where did they state Trump wasn't responsible? Here's your chance to prove your right wing sources got something correct. Stop trying to weasel out.
They report, you decide. And if you had a lick of common sense, even you have to conclude what they (and others) reported was that this was not a spontaneous attack, which means it had absolutely nothing to do with Trump's speech given at the same time. It was planned as the FBI reported. In other words, the commies impeached a President for bogus reasons. They made the entire thing up, just like Republicans are going to do when we impeach creepy Joe after we get control of the House in 2022. But......I don't want to hear you sheep crying about it, because remember, it's the commies that created this new impeachment precedent.
It had everything to do with these clowns listening to Trump for two months talk about a stolen election. If Trump had simply conceded this wouldn't have happened.
Begin swearing? Oh, you're dainty ears.
The OP made a claim and the source material doesn't show that.
If Trump had simply conceded this wouldn't have happened.
That is a 100% guess on your part. I believe our News Entertainment Media caused this vs. Trump. Opinions are allowed to vary. The optics were bad and therein lies the problem.
If you removed the spark you don't have a fire. The responsbile media never claimed the election was stolen which was the cause célèbre of the redneck revolt.
Going back to the OP. WaPo never "admitted" that Trump wasn't responsible.
Did WAPO state that "Trump was 100% responsible"?
Sure, bud. Take your sad sack feelings and slither away.
The WaPo didn't say what the OP stated and you appear to have given up arguing that point because as per usual, you guys usually lose.
The title of the thread more than just infers it. However the article doesn't even go that far.
Now the Washington Post Admits Trump Did Not Incite the Capitol Riot
My educated guess consisted of reading the article and comparing it to the claims of the OP and seeing they do not match. If your only argument against that is I'm just guessing then you have just lost every future argument you make on this board.
If Trump had simply conceded this wouldn't have happened.
Yes or no?
I did. If Trump had conceded there wouldn't have been a cause for the riot since they were there to interfere with the election process.
We already knew some who were arrested (like coyote boi) stated they were following Trump. If you remove the reason for the insurrection there would be no reason for the attempt to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power.
Pardon-Seeking Rioters 'Following My President' Could Hurt Trump's Case
The "Trump told me to" defense provides "great evidence" for a Senate impeachment trial, joked one activist.www.newsweek.com
Speaking of this definitive statement argument of yours, it appears desperate since you're not known to stick to the facts. And if you're only interested in definitive statements then you'd have to agree that the OP is making a declaration that hasn't been proven.
LMAO....says the person who makes up their own facts. Give me ONE example where I do not stick to facts. You're such a cowardly leftist.
Haven't made up anything.
Just pointing out that the reason these idiots committed acts of insurrection just happens to align with Trump's claims of election fraud. Often spouted here by the likes of people like you.
I am not a leftist sheep. You are. Loser.