RoccoR
Gold Member
RE: Now it's a basic law: The State of Israel is the national home of the Jewish people
※→ Billo_Really,
I'm pretty sure that you don't understand the meaning of apartheid or the elements of that offense.
As you can see for yourself. Israel is many more time diverse than the Arab Palestinian population. There is no attempt to systematically oppress and dominate one racial group over any other racial group. Jews are a matter of religion, where as the term "Arab Palestinians" describes an ethnic tribe.
Israel is attempting to protect its sovereignty from Arab League conventional warfare assaults and Jihadism, Fedayeen Activism, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence. The Arab Palestinians utilize threats to use force designed to bring about political change. These Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) activities exercise the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives. What the HoAP passes-off as oppression by the Israelis are Article 43 (Hague Regulation) attempt to establish law and order, and at the same time utilizing Article 68 Authority (GCIV) to protect against the HoAP acts solely intended to harm the Occupying Power, seriously damage the property of the occupying forces or administration or the installations, and defend against espionage, of serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power or of intentional offences which have caused the death of one or more persons. Security countermeasures in-depth to separate the HoAP from those they would openly attack, are attempts to restore and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety. There is no true domination or oppression.
Article 7(2h), Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
Article 7 (1j), Elements of Crimes, International Criminal Court
Most Respectfully,
R
※→ Billo_Really,
I'm pretty sure that you don't understand the meaning of apartheid or the elements of that offense.
(COMMENT)
As you can see for yourself. Israel is many more time diverse than the Arab Palestinian population. There is no attempt to systematically oppress and dominate one racial group over any other racial group. Jews are a matter of religion, where as the term "Arab Palestinians" describes an ethnic tribe.
Israel is attempting to protect its sovereignty from Arab League conventional warfare assaults and Jihadism, Fedayeen Activism, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence. The Arab Palestinians utilize threats to use force designed to bring about political change. These Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) activities exercise the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives. What the HoAP passes-off as oppression by the Israelis are Article 43 (Hague Regulation) attempt to establish law and order, and at the same time utilizing Article 68 Authority (GCIV) to protect against the HoAP acts solely intended to harm the Occupying Power, seriously damage the property of the occupying forces or administration or the installations, and defend against espionage, of serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power or of intentional offences which have caused the death of one or more persons. Security countermeasures in-depth to separate the HoAP from those they would openly attack, are attempts to restore and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety. There is no true domination or oppression.
Article 7(2h), Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
"The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those
referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized
regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any
other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining
that regime;"
referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized
regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any
other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining
that regime;"
Article 7 (1j), Elements of Crimes, International Criminal Court
Crime against humanity of apartheid
Elements
Elements
1. The perpetrator committed an inhumane act against one or more persons.
2. Such act was an act referred to in article 7, paragraph 1, of the Statute, or was an act
of a character similar to any of those acts.
3. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established the character
of the act.
4. The conduct was committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic
oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups.
5. The perpetrator intended to maintain such regime by that conduct.
6. The conduct was committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed
against a civilian population.
7. The perpetrator knew that the conduct was part of or intended the conduct to be part
of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian population.
2. Such act was an act referred to in article 7, paragraph 1, of the Statute, or was an act
of a character similar to any of those acts.
3. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established the character
of the act.
4. The conduct was committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic
oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups.
5. The perpetrator intended to maintain such regime by that conduct.
6. The conduct was committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed
against a civilian population.
7. The perpetrator knew that the conduct was part of or intended the conduct to be part
of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian population.
Most Respectfully,
R
